Page 2/2 March 15, 2012
- 9
th
Circuit – Chief Judge Judges ALEX KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges WILLIAM CANBY, Jr,EDWARD LEAVY, ARTHUR L ALARCON, DIARMUID F O’SCANNLAIN, BARRY GSILVERMAN, STEPHENREINHARDT,MARSHA BERZON and MILAN SMITH, Clerk
MOLLY C DWYER, and
[
,
,
,
xxviii
]
- 11
th
Circuit – Chief Judge JOEL F DUBINA, Circuit Judges R LANIER ANDERSON III,BEVERLY B MARTIN, WILLIAM H PRIOR Jr, CHARLES R WILSON, Clerk of the Court JOHNLEY.
[
]
In two cases, the evidence of conduct of simulated review from fraudulent records of the lower courts waspresented to the courts, while such reviews were under way:- The US Supreme Court unlawfully “returned” papers that had been duly filed.
[
]
- The US Court of Appeals,for the 9
th
Circuit refused to rule on the matter, and continued the conductof a simulated appeal.
[
]
“The evidence shows that the courts of appeals and the Supreme Court routinely patronize corruption in thelower courts,” says Dr Zernik.The evidence also includes numerous requests for impeachment of US judges and clerks. The most notable
among them is the request for impeachment of the Clerk US Supreme Court WILLIAM SUTER.
[
,
]
Criminal complaint was also filed withtheUS Attorney Office in Washington DC against the SupremeCourt’s Counsel DANNY BICKELL.
[
]
In both cases, public corruption and deprivation of rights werealleged, through denial of the right to file papers in court, and through the issuance of false and deliberatelymisleading papers on behalf of the Supreme Court.Most of the cases involve abuse of the rights of individual to benefit large corporations and financialinstitutions, or corrupt officers of the states’ justice systems, through the issuance of fraudulent court records.The US courts at all levels implemented with no public oversight electronic records systems, which amountedto a sea change in procedures related to filing of papers by parties, and the entry of orders and judgments bythe courts themselves. The failure to validate the integrity of these systems left them widely open fordishonest manipulations.The evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the US courts was peer-reviewed and publishedby an international Computer Science journal.
[
]
The evidence also documents that the US courts have effectively instituted a policy, denying the right to filepapersin court, which include evidence of corruption of judges or other government officers.
[
,
,
,
]
“Upon review of the evidence, a reasonable person would be seriously concerned about large-scale bribing of US judges andclerksby banking institutions, most notably – BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,” says
Dr Zernik.
[
,
,
]
For example, US Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS and US Magistrate CARLAWOEHRLE refused to file statements on the record regarding financial benefits to them by BANK OFAMERICA, while engaging in fraud on the court to benefit Bank of America.The evidence also includes review of the litigation of
SEC v Bank of America Corporation
in the US DistrictCourt, Southern District of New York, involving Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK. Thecase was widely reported by media, and the Wall Street Journal hailed Judge JED RAKOFF for being “tough”in enforcement of banking regulation under the current crisis.The fraud by Judge JED RAKOFF and others in litigation of
SEC v Bank of America Corporation
was peer-reviewed and presented in the 16
th
World Criminology Congress.
[
,
]
The executive branch has so far consistently refused to address the corruption of the state and US courts:- Attorney General ERIC HOLDER has so far failed to respond on request, filed by William Windsorof Lawless America and Joseph Zernik of Human Rights Alert, to review the evidence of large-scalefraud in the electronic records of the US courts.
[
]