Professional Documents
Culture Documents
F Economic bloc: A group of countries who act together for a common purpose, united by treaty or agreement F Types of economic blocs - for trade purposes
Good news - Trading opportunities enhanced within bloc Bad news - Trading opportunities discouraged outside bloc Are you enhancing trade with good, low cost partners?
F Good or bad?
Adding trade barriers generally bad as in analysis of tariffs Relaxing trade barriers intuitively good, except what if you eliminate barriers vis--vis a country that is a high cost producer?
u Trade creation effect: Lower barriers create trade, and gains from trade u Trade diversion effect: Lower barriers with some (not all) countries may tilt (divert) trade toward high cost producers ( loss from trade)
F Consider countries A, B & C F Country A has upward sloping supply and imports from either B or C, with tariff T F Before Customs Union
SB + T SC + T
A D E
B F
C G H
SB SC
As imports from C are Q3 - Q2 Welfare loss (from tariff) = lost consumer surplus - tariff rev {A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H} - {B+F} = {A+D+E} + {C+G+H}
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Prof. Levich
C45.0001, Economics of IB
Chapter 11, p. 5
A D E
B F
C G H
SB SC
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
F Did customs union of A&B improve welfare? Yes, if {D+E+F+G+H} < {A+D+E} + {C+G+H} or if F < A + C F F: Trade diversion effect F A+C: Trade creation effect
Prof. Levich
C45.0001, Economics of IB
Chapter 11, p. 6
F Caveats
Customs union effects all goods, may be trade creation gains on some goods, but trade divergence losses on others
F Other benefits
Welfare gain a flow, take NPV Static vs. dynamic effects (scale economies, other incentives)
Prof. Levich C45.0001, Economics of IB Chapter 11, p. 7
Prof. Levich
Dynamic gains from scale economies, stimulating productivity improvements, and increased competition
u Probably a (+), but hard to estimate with accuracy. u Cecchini Report (1988) estimated gains ~ 5.3% of EU GDP Gains from removal of non-tariff trade barriers 0.20% Gains from removal of production barriers 2.20% Economies of scale 1.65% Intensified competition 1.25%
Prof. Levich C45.0001, Economics of IB Chapter 11, p. 9
9.3
0.2
0.5
-0.0
Prof. Levich
F On Trade Barriers
1993 Average Mex. tariff (on US) 10%, in 1996 ~2.9% 1993 Average U.S. tariff (on Mex) 2.1%, in 1996 ~0.65%
F On U.S. Economy
Challenge - estimate impact of NAFTA, controlling for other factors, + Uruguay Round tariffs reductions were scheduled Small positive impacts on U.S. net exports, income, investment, and jobs supported by exports
Prof. Levich C45.0001, Economics of IB Chapter 11, p. 12
F On Key Sectors
US suppliers have dominant share (75.5%, up from 69.3%) in Mexico imports. Reflects drop in Mexico tariffs vs. U.S. Larger in some sectors (electronic goods, transport equip.) In textiles, % US imports from Mexico , from Asia
Prof. Levich
C45.0001, Economics of IB
Chapter 11, p. 13
F On the Environment
2,000 mile border with Mexico NAFTA includes environmental safeguards, has led to greater cooperation on environmental issues and monitoring Issues cover - infrastructure projects, movement of hazardous wastes, wildlife, banning certain pesticides Source: U.S. Trade Representatives Report on NAFTA, 1997.
Prof. Levich C45.0001, Economics of IB Chapter 11, p. 14
Trade Blocks
F Denial of trading opportunities used as politicaleconomic weapon F Types of trade blocks
Sanctions - General term for restrictions of some sort
u Ban on textiles, sneakers & soccer balls made with child labor
Embargoes & boycotts - complete ban on trade NOT Trade War tariff, retaliation, further retaliation, etc.
Scope: sanctions on more goods puts larger cost on small country Friends: more effective when large country enlists others to cooperate, less effective if target maintains trade with others Timing: extreme, sudden sanctions more effective; more time allows more time to adjust Politics: dictatorship may retain power even when economic costs are high
Prof. Levich C45.0001, Economics of IB Chapter 11, p. 17