Building

Capacity for Teaching and Learning: Results of the Participant Exit Survey
A Teachers Without Borders blended teacher professional development program, offered with the support of the Department of Human Development, Education and Culture (DHDEC) at the Organization of American States.
PART 1: Three-day Face-to-Face Workshop 1. How would you rate this face-to-face workshop, overall? (1 being the lowest score, 5 being the highest):

2. What did you like most about this workshop? Cooperative learning practices used by instructor Timed comprehension exercises Cooperative learning approach and sharing in groups Discussions with other participants Interactions among participants/discussions and the level of instructors preparedness The instructors approach and teaching styles Facilitators methodology and how he included everyone in discussions The facilitators work style and sharing of knowledge The facilitators skill Cooperative learning strategies used by the facilitator The section on Education for the New Millennium The facilitators knowledge, listening skills, and the ability to engage us and answer our questions Working in groups 1

Teaching methods used The facilitators methodology and capacity to motivate the participants Group work Introduction to different education topics 3. What did you like least about this workshop? (Optional) Introduction to computers The session on the introduction to computers We were not treated well in regards to food (except on Day 1) Not enough time for discussions The location of this workshop Introduction to computers part of the workshop Everything surrounding logistics, including rooms, lack of food, and computer facilitator We lost a lot of time on the first day Introduction to computers Introduction to computers the teaching method was bad Not having enough time Logistics around food The person in charge was late Time that was not used properly 4. How would you rate the facilitator of this face-to-face workshop (1 being the lowest score, 5 being the highest):

5. The facilitator was engaging:

6. The facilitator was well-prepared and well-organized:

7. The facilitator gave us enough opportunities to speak, exchange ideas with other participants, work with each other in groups:

8. The facilitator was effective in his time management.

PART II: The Online Workshop 1. Please rate the following aspects of the platform used for the online part of the program: (1 being the lowest score, 5 being the highest): Visually appealing:

Clear and well-organized:

Easy to use:

Good addition to the program:

Helped create a sense of community:

Facilitated conversations and interactions with colleagues:

2. Please rate the facilitators of the online part of the program: Knowledgeable about topics covered:

Provided excellent feedback and direction:

Supportive and encouraging:

Clear regarding deadlines and expectations:

Engaged me in learning and interactions with colleagues:

PART III: Program Content and Organization 1. Were your general expectations of the course fulfilled? Choose one.

Other (Please explain): The people in charge of ESIH did not make us feel welcome, starting the second week of August 2. Based on your teaching context and how you plan to use this material with your students, what parts of this workshop were most useful to you? Please list them below: Constructivism, cooperative learning, multiculturalism and education Multiple Intelligences, being an innovative teacher, multicultural understanding, different approaches to evaluation Class management and evaluation strategies Evaluation strategies, sensitive listening skills, multiculturalism Interactions with other participants and the curriculum materials we received Multiculturalism and education, evaluation practices, class management, multiple intelligences, defining a good teacher What it means to be an effective teacher, culture of understanding, multiple intelligences Class management, multiculturalism in education, cooperative learning, face-to-face part of the program Multiple intelligences, education for the new millennium, class management, facilitators professionalism, trust, and respect that could be felt throughout the workshop Courses 2, 3, and 4 Evaluation strategies, classroom management, multiculturalism in education Evaluation strategies and learning theories 9

Group work and encouraging students Evaluation strategies, Blooms Taxonomy, multicultural education, cooperative learning Evaluation strategies 3. What additions would you make to the content of this course to make it more helpful or relevant to you? Case studies related to current problems in Haitian classrooms I would like to be able to continue to interact with the other participants I would like the content to reflect the Haitian reality more closely Expand learning environments and scale this program We should have these workshops every trimester It needs to be tailored to the realities in my country Emphasis on subject matter 4. What kind of program delivery do you prefer:

5. This workshop helped me become a more effective as a teacher:

10

6. This workshop prepared me to become a teacher leader/mentor in my school/professional community:

11

PART IV: Program Structure and Delivery 1. What would be the ideal length of a face-to-face only program?

2. What would be the ideal length of an online only program?

3. When, during the school year, should this program be offered to ensure that it aligns well with teacher schedules?

12

4. Are you satisfied with the mode of delivery of the program you just completed (three-day face-to-face session, followed by a 4-6 week online program and additional time to complete the final project)?

13