Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Buy Now $32.99
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
27Activity

Table Of Contents

On the Nature of Media Bias
Forces Acting on the News
The Challenges of Measuring Bias
Are “The Media” “Biased”?
Figure 4.1. Number of Studies by Year
Table 4.1. Overall analysis of bias by medium
Myths and Realities of Coverage
Table 5.1. Coverage vs. endorsements in newspapers
Table 5.3. Effect sizes for incumbency effects
Table 5.4. TV news biases by network
Conclusions, Caveats, and Ruminations
Table A.1. Master Analysis Table
References
Index
P. 1
Media Bias in Presidential Election Coverage 1948-2008: Evaluation via Formal Measurement

Media Bias in Presidential Election Coverage 1948-2008: Evaluation via Formal Measurement

Ratings: (0)|Views: 329 |Likes:
Published by RowmanLittlefield
Accusations of partisan bias in Presidential election coverage are suspect at best and self-serving at worst. They are generally supported by the methodology of instance confirmation, tainted by the hostile media effect, and based on simplistic visions of how the news media are organized. Media Bias in Presidential Election Coverage 1948-2008 by Dave D’Alessio, is a revealing analysis that shows the news media have four essential natures: as journalistic entities, businesses, political actors, and property, all of which can act to create news coverage biases, in some cases in opposing directions. By meta-analyzing the results of 99 previous examinations of media coverage of Presidential elections from 1948 to 2008, D’Alessio reveals that coverage has no aggregate partisan bias either way, even though there are small biases in specific realms that are generally insubstantial. Furthermore, while publishers used to control coverage preferences, this practice has become negligible in recent years. Media Bias proves that, at least in terms of Presidential election coverage, The New York Times is not the most liberal paper in America and the Fox News channel is substantially more conservative in news coverage than the broadcast networks. Finally, Media Bias in Presidential Election Coverage 1948-2008 predicts that no amount of evidence will cause political candidates to cease complaining about bias because such accusations have both strategic potential in campaigns and an undeniable utility in ego defense.
Accusations of partisan bias in Presidential election coverage are suspect at best and self-serving at worst. They are generally supported by the methodology of instance confirmation, tainted by the hostile media effect, and based on simplistic visions of how the news media are organized. Media Bias in Presidential Election Coverage 1948-2008 by Dave D’Alessio, is a revealing analysis that shows the news media have four essential natures: as journalistic entities, businesses, political actors, and property, all of which can act to create news coverage biases, in some cases in opposing directions. By meta-analyzing the results of 99 previous examinations of media coverage of Presidential elections from 1948 to 2008, D’Alessio reveals that coverage has no aggregate partisan bias either way, even though there are small biases in specific realms that are generally insubstantial. Furthermore, while publishers used to control coverage preferences, this practice has become negligible in recent years. Media Bias proves that, at least in terms of Presidential election coverage, The New York Times is not the most liberal paper in America and the Fox News channel is substantially more conservative in news coverage than the broadcast networks. Finally, Media Bias in Presidential Election Coverage 1948-2008 predicts that no amount of evidence will cause political candidates to cease complaining about bias because such accusations have both strategic potential in campaigns and an undeniable utility in ego defense.

More info:

Publish date: Apr 2012
Added to Scribd: Mar 28, 2012
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reservedISBN:9780739164761
List Price: $32.99 Buy Now

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
This book can be read on up to 6 mobile devices.
Buy the full version from:Amazon
See more
See less

11/05/2014

155

9780739164761

$32.99

USD

You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 7 to 58 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 65 to 75 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 82 to 102 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 109 to 127 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 134 to 155 are not shown in this preview.

Activity (27)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Radford Scribd liked this
lizita182 liked this
hwschulte liked this
Rose liked this
Ellenna Tsapean liked this
archestral liked this
lizita182 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->