Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Transcript of Wednesday's arguments on severability

Transcript of Wednesday's arguments on severability

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5,212|Likes:
Published by USA TODAY

More info:

Published by: USA TODAY on Mar 28, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/28/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -xNATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT :BUSINESS, ET AL., :Petitioners : No. 11-393v. :KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF :HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL. :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -xand- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -xFLORIDA, ET AL., :Petitioners : No. 11-400v. :DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND :HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL. :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -xWashington, D.C.Wednesday, March 28, 2012The above-entitled matter came on for oralargument before the Supreme Court of the United Statesat 10:19 a.m.APPEARANCES:PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf of1
Alderson Reporting Company
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
Petitioners.EDWIN S. KNEEDLER, ESQ., Deputy Solicitor General,Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; on behalf ofRespondents.H. BARTOW FARR, III, ESQ., Washington, D.C..; forCourt-appointed amicus curiae.2
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
C O N T E N T S
ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGEPAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioners 4ORAL ARGUMENT OFEDWIN S. KNEEDLER, ESQ.On behalf of the Respondents 28ORAL ARGUMENT OFH. BARTOW FARR, III, ESQ.For Court-appointed amicus curiae 55REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OFPAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioners 793
Alderson Reporting Company

Activity (4)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->