Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
8Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Health Care Reform in Supreme Court Day 3 Arguments

Health Care Reform in Supreme Court Day 3 Arguments

Ratings: (0)|Views: 13,419 |Likes:
Published by PBS NewsHour
As the Supreme Court convenes for a final day of hearings on the constitutionality of the health care reform law, two important questions remain before the Court. Arguments for Part 1 came in the morning: If the requirement that most Americans purchase health insurance or pay a fine is dismantled by the Court, must the rest of the law fall with it?
As the Supreme Court convenes for a final day of hearings on the constitutionality of the health care reform law, two important questions remain before the Court. Arguments for Part 1 came in the morning: If the requirement that most Americans purchase health insurance or pay a fine is dismantled by the Court, must the rest of the law fall with it?

More info:

Published by: PBS NewsHour on Mar 28, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/28/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -xNATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT :BUSINESS, ET AL., :Petitioners : No. 11-393v. :KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF :HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL. :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -xand- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -xFLORIDA, ET AL., :Petitioners : No. 11-400v. :DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND :HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL. :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -xWashington, D.C.Wednesday, March 28, 2012The above-entitled matter came on for oralargument before the Supreme Court of the United Statesat 10:19 a.m.APPEARANCES:PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf of1
Alderson Reporting Company
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
Petitioners.EDWIN S. KNEEDLER, ESQ., Deputy Solicitor General,Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; on behalf ofRespondents.H. BARTOW FARR, III, ESQ., Washington, D.C..; forCourt-appointed amicus curiae.2
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
C O N T E N T S
ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGEPAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioners 4ORAL ARGUMENT OFEDWIN S. KNEEDLER, ESQ.On behalf of the Respondents 28ORAL ARGUMENT OFH. BARTOW FARR, III, ESQ.For Court-appointed amicus curiae 55REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OFPAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioners 793
Alderson Reporting Company

Activity (8)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Richard Butler liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->