•
Richard Clarke on Who Was Behind the StuxnetAttack
America's longtime counterterrorism czar warns that the cyberwars have already begun—and that wemight be losing
•
•
Smithsonian
magazine, April 2012,
Clarke has seen the future of war and says it will be fought by hackers.
Khue Bui
Related Topics
•
•
The story Richard Clarke spins has all the suspense of a postmodern geopolitical thriller. The tale involves aghostly cyberworm created to attack the nuclear centrifuges of a rogue nation—which then escapes from thetarget country, replicating itself in thousands of computers throughout the world. It may be lurking in yoursright now. Harmlessly inactive...or awaiting further orders. A great story, right? In fact, the world-changing “weaponized malware” computer worm called Stuxnet is very real. It seems to have been launched in mid-2009, done terrific damage to Iran’s nuclear program in2010 and then spread to computers all over the world. Stuxnet may have averted a nuclear conflagration by diminishing Israel’s perception of a need for an imminent attack on Iran. And yet it might end up startingone someday soon, if its replications are manipulated maliciously. And at the heart of the story is a mystery: Who made and launched Stuxnet in the first place?Richard Clarke tells me he knows the answer.Clarke, who served three presidents as counterterrorism czar, now operates a cybersecurity consultancy called Good Harbor, located in one of those anonymous office towers in Arlington, Virginia, that triangulatethe Pentagon and the Capitol in more ways than one. I had come to talk to him about what’s been done sincethe urgent alarm he’d sounded in his recent book,
. The book’s central argument is that, while theUnited States has developed the capability to conduct an offensive cyberwar, we have virtually no
against the cyberattacks that he says are targeting us now, and will be in the future.Richard Clarke’s warnings may sound overly dramatic until you remember that he was the man, inSeptember of 2001, who tried to get the White House to act on his warnings that Al Qaeda was preparing aspectacular attack on American soil.Clarke later delivered a famous apology to the American people in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission:“Your government failed you.”Clarke now wants to warn us, urgently, that we are being failed again, being left defenseless against acyberattack that could bring down our nation’s entire electronic infrastructure, including the power grid, banking and telecommunications, and even our military command system.“Are we as a nation living in denial about the danger we’re in?” I asked Clarke as we sat across a conferencetable in his office suite.
“I think we’re living in the world of non-response. Where you know that there’s a problem, but you don’t doanything about it. If that’s denial, then that’s denial.” As Clarke stood next to a window inserting coffee capsules into a Nespresso machine, I was reminded of theopening of one of the great espionage films of all time,
, in which Michael Caine silently,precisely, grinds and brews his morning coffee. High-tech java seems to go with the job.But saying Clarke was a spy doesn’t do him justice. He was a meta-spy, a master counterespionage, counter-terrorism savant, the central node where all the most secret, stolen, security-encrypted bits of informationgathered by our trillion-dollar human, electronic and satellite intelligence network eventually converged.Clarke has probably been privy to as much “above top secret”- grade espionage intelligence as anyone atLangley, NSA or the White House. So I was intrigued when he chose to talk to me about the mysteries of Stuxnet.“The picture you paint in your book,” I said to Clarke, “is of a U.S. totally vulnerable to cyberattack. Butthere is no defense, really, is there?” There are billions of portals, trapdoors, “exploits,” as the cybersecurity guys call them, ready to be hacked.“There isn’t today,” he agrees. Worse, he continues, catastrophic consequences may result from using ourcyberoffense without having a cyberdefense: blowback, revenge beyond our imaginings.“The U.S. government is involved in espionage against other governments,” he says flatly. “There’s a bigdifference, however, between the kind of cyberespionage the United States government does and China. TheU.S. government doesn’t hack its way into Airbus and give Airbus the secrets to Boeing [many believe thatChinese hackers gave Boeing secrets to Airbus]. We don’t hack our way into a Chinese computer company like Huawei and provide the secrets of Huawei technology to their American competitor Cisco. [He believesMicrosoft, too, was a victim of a Chinese cyber con game.] We don’t do that.”“What do we do then?”“We hack our way into foreign governments and collect the information off their networks. The same kind of information a CIA agent in the old days would try to buy from a spy.”“So you’re talking about diplomatic stuff?”
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Richard Clarke on Who Was Behind the Stuxnet Attack
39
Reads
0
Readcasts
0
Embed Views
Get Scribd Mobile
To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
We'll never share your phone number.
More From This User
Notes
Load more
