Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Defendant Thomas DiBiase's Reply in Support of Proposed Order Finding Righthaven in Contempt of Court and Imposing Sanctions

Defendant Thomas DiBiase's Reply in Support of Proposed Order Finding Righthaven in Contempt of Court and Imposing Sanctions

Ratings: (0)|Views: 650|Likes:
Published by rhvictims
CASE NO.: 2:10-cv-1343 RLH PAL
CASE NO.: 2:10-cv-1343 RLH PAL

More info:

Published by: rhvictims on Mar 30, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

01/13/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728COLLEEN BAL (
 pro hac vice
)cbal@wsgr.comWILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 Page Mill RoadPalo Alto, CA 94304-1050Telephone: (650) 493-9300Facsimile: (650) 493-6811CHAD BOWERS bowers@lawyer.comCHAD A. BOWERS, LTD Nevada State Bar No. 72833202 West Charleston BoulevardLas Vegas, Nevada 89102Telephone: (702) 457-1001Attorneys for Defendant & CounterclaimantTHOMAS A. DIBIASEKURT OPSAHL (
 pro hac vice
)kurt@eff.orgCORYNNE MCSHERRY (
 pro hac vice
)corynne@eff.orgELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION454 Shotwell StreetSan Francisco, CA 94110Telephone: (415) 436-9333Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited-liabilitycompany,Plaintiff,v.THOMAS A. DIBIASE, an individual,Defendant. _______________________________________ THOMAS A. DIBIASE, an individual,Counterclaimant,v.RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada Limited-Liability Company,Counter-defendant.)))))))))))))))))))))))))CASE NO.: 2:10-cv-1343 RLH PAL
DEFENDANT THOMAS DIBIASE’SREPLY IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSEDORDER FINDING RIGHTHAVEN INCONTEMPT OF COURT ANDIMPOSING SANCTIONS
Case 2:10-cv-01343-RLH -PAL Document 112 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 20
 
 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
!
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1II.
!
Argument .................................................................................................................................... 2A.
!
Righthaven’s CEO Steven Gibson Has the Ability to Comply ................................... 2B.
!
Righthaven and its CEO Steven Gibson Had Notice .................................................. 5C.
!
Coercive Sanctions Against Steven Gibson Remain Proper ....................................... 8III.
!
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 9
!
 
Case 2:10-cv-01343-RLH -PAL Document 112 Filed 03/29/12 Page 2 of 20
 
 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627281
I.
 
Introduction
If further evidence of the contempt of Steven Gibson, CEO of Plaintiff Righthaven LLC,
1
 for this Court were needed, it is provided by his response to the Proposed Order. Where a degree of contrition would be more appropriate, Mr. Gibson offers excuses and proposals for further delays,none of which explains Righthaven’s ongoing failure to be “reasonably diligent and energetic inattempting” to accomplish what this Court ordered.
 E.E.O.C. v. Local 638, Local 28 of Sheet  Metal Workers’ Int’l Ass’n,
753 F.2d 1172, 1178 (2d Cir.1985),
aff’d 
, 478 U.S. 421 (1986).Mr. Gibson proposes that the Court place responsibility solely on its counsel of record, ShawnMangano. Given that, as even Mr. Gibson acknowledges, Mr. Mangano is nowhere to be found,this is actually a request for Righthaven, and Mr. Gibson, to avoid all accountability.Mr. Gibson’s proposal runs directly contrary to settled law. “An order issued to acorporation is identical to an order issued to its officers, for incorporeal abstractions act throughagents.”
 Reich v. Sea Sprite Boat Co
., 50 F.3d 413, 417 (7th Cir. 1995);
accord 
 
 N.L.R.B. v. Sequoia Dist. Council of Carpenters, AFL-CIO
, 568 F.2d 628, 634 (9th Cir. 1977). Thus, Mr. Mangano’sunavailability does not absolve Righthaven of responsibility. Mr. Gibson can hire another lawyer or get it done himself.The time for excuses and blaming others has long since past. Mr. Gibson, as CEO and the principal officer of Righthaven, has to comply with this Court’s order and purge the ongoingcontempt of court. There really is a simple solution for this problem (that should not have requiredall these hearings or briefs):
hand over the documents
. Because he continues to fail to do so,Mr. Gibson must be sanctioned for his contempt of court.Accordingly, Defendant Thomas DiBiase respectfully requests this Court enter the order he proposed.
1
Mr. Gibson claims to be a non-party. There is a host of compelling evidence that Righthaven isactually an alter-ego of Mr. Gibson. However, this Court need not decide that issue yet, becausethe case law “does not require that the corporate veil be capable of being pierced prior to imposing personal liability on the corporate officers responsible for insuring the corporation's compliancewith a court order.”
Connolly v. J.T. Ventures
, 851 F.2d 930, 935 (7th Cir. 1988);
accord N.L.R.B.v. Maine Caterers, Inc
., 732 F. 2d 689 (1st Cir. 1984).
Case 2:10-cv-01343-RLH -PAL Document 112 Filed 03/29/12 Page 3 of 20

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->