t at the time of the actions & events alleged herein & is not presently subject to the purported Governance of any purported Political Governing body, their purported “Body Politic”; “Legal Domicile”; “Officers”;“Agencies”; “Agents”; or “Employees”; of any purported “Body Politic”, &has never given her “Consent” to “be Governed” by any such Fictitious Bodies
& does not now give her Consent to be Governed by any such Body Politic,or their Statutes , Acts, Codes, By-Laws, Ordinances, Addendum’s, Military, and / or Any Rule of the De-Facto STATE OF CALIFORNIA nor any of the purported Officers or Employees of said State or the “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, in accordance with the Express Language of the “Unanimous Declaration of Independence of the United States of America” signed on July 4,1776, which Expressly states:
“ ' WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF EVIDENT, THAT ALL MEN ARECREATED EQUAL. THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITHCERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE,LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS''“THAT TO SECURE THESERIGHTS GOVERNMENTS ARE INSTITUTED AMONG MEN,
DERIVING THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE
OF THE GOVERNED.
” and in accordance with the California Supreme Court Ruling in the Case of: Thor v. Superior Court (Andrews) (1993) 5 Cal.4th 725 : Stating:
More than a century ago, the United States Supreme Court declared,"No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by thecommon law, than the right of every individual to possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. ... 'The