Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
P. 1
“Little Boxes: (Il)logic(s) of Truth-Room(s)"

“Little Boxes: (Il)logic(s) of Truth-Room(s)"

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,969|Likes:
2006. “Little Boxes: (Il)logic(s) of Truth-Room(s)" Conference on Methodology and Science. Visva Bharati, January 9-11, 2006. (INVITED)“And the people in the houses/All went to the university/Where they were put in boxes
/And they came out all the same...Little boxes all the same, ”-- Malvina Reynolds (sung by Pete Seeger, 1962) . In connection with the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, this interdisciplinary paper on method tries to show that the relativity of language is not only cultural, but also epistemological. Here I was reiterating Nietzsche – truth-seeking is a disease – will to know leads to will to power. Even then, we have truth rooms (TR) and we are celebrating our truth claims. We are following, either in our life-spaces/statist-space or in academic spaces, different “original/fundamental” TRs. When I am branding one TR as fundamentalist, I do not consider my TR as fundamentalist, though it is “fundamental original” piece of work. Following Malvina Reynolds, I want to call all these TRs as little boxes. Within this little box or TR of one vegetarian, all the animal proteins, onion are prohibited and another vegetarian thinks s/he can consume onion and egg and still preserves vegetarian status. In case of determining the semantic status of the term ‘vegetarian’, how do we incorporate two TRs of two vegetarians? On the other hand, the ‘meaning’ of the term might be decided positively by terminating one of them. Where are the entry-points and closures of such TRs? Or, they “all look just the same”? My Little Box gives me security and provides me with discomfort. This very much claustrophobic dependence on a single TR makes me remember of a giant, Damastes or otherwise Prokrustes, who laid all human beings on his bed and then “lop them or rack them out to make fit it.” Are these TRs Procrustean Bed? Let us scrutinize some TRs in reference to different academic disciplines. M. Rouget argued (cited in Hollis, 1994: 55) that scientific statements are often “as if” “true”. As sometimes in Classical Physics, we presume such vacuum to continue our agenda for model-theoretic approach. In case of Linguistic TR, Chomsky’s “ideal” speaking subject stands in a vacuum. Chomsky’s TR is like this: “Context free ideal creative speaking subject with zero history”, on the other hand in another TR, one may postulate, “Context-sensitive creative speaking corporeal with history (childhood configuration etc.)”. In Science, we generally idealize a formula by considering “other” variables as non-existent entities. In Cricket , we can say, without any hesitation that Shane Warne is continuing his 6.5 over. What is the status of .5 in six-balls’ over? If Wittgenstein is to be believed, mathematics is a practice, performance of a community. For Wittgenstein, communalism of mathematics is determined by the communities’ convenience and necessity. In case of Economics, I can write “3 goats= 1 cow or “one apartment= $ 200000” by adding some sufficient causes. How do I put the sign= in between two unequal things? Questioning the equalizing effect of a sign as a dangerous supplement, a properly signed signifier called money, is prohibited within economics’ TR. I am representing the presentations of a priori, though it is neither analytical a priori, nor the synthetic one, but something called historical a priori—an a priori approximated by the historical incidences and they get epistemic status within a ghetto of a TR. I had then switched over to some problems of ordinary language, the problem of fuzzy numerals in Bangla, which, from Logical Positivist perspective, is illogical. (cf. Paper ID=7802) If I do not like one TR, let me take it as a legitimate possibility without any commitment and on the other hand, if I feel comfort in one of these TRs, let me commit myself to that particular TR. Alternatively, we may swing from one TR to another TR. What I was paraphrasing here is nothing but the re-reading of Jaina pluralism by Krishnachandra a
2006. “Little Boxes: (Il)logic(s) of Truth-Room(s)" Conference on Methodology and Science. Visva Bharati, January 9-11, 2006. (INVITED)“And the people in the houses/All went to the university/Where they were put in boxes
/And they came out all the same...Little boxes all the same, ”-- Malvina Reynolds (sung by Pete Seeger, 1962) . In connection with the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, this interdisciplinary paper on method tries to show that the relativity of language is not only cultural, but also epistemological. Here I was reiterating Nietzsche – truth-seeking is a disease – will to know leads to will to power. Even then, we have truth rooms (TR) and we are celebrating our truth claims. We are following, either in our life-spaces/statist-space or in academic spaces, different “original/fundamental” TRs. When I am branding one TR as fundamentalist, I do not consider my TR as fundamentalist, though it is “fundamental original” piece of work. Following Malvina Reynolds, I want to call all these TRs as little boxes. Within this little box or TR of one vegetarian, all the animal proteins, onion are prohibited and another vegetarian thinks s/he can consume onion and egg and still preserves vegetarian status. In case of determining the semantic status of the term ‘vegetarian’, how do we incorporate two TRs of two vegetarians? On the other hand, the ‘meaning’ of the term might be decided positively by terminating one of them. Where are the entry-points and closures of such TRs? Or, they “all look just the same”? My Little Box gives me security and provides me with discomfort. This very much claustrophobic dependence on a single TR makes me remember of a giant, Damastes or otherwise Prokrustes, who laid all human beings on his bed and then “lop them or rack them out to make fit it.” Are these TRs Procrustean Bed? Let us scrutinize some TRs in reference to different academic disciplines. M. Rouget argued (cited in Hollis, 1994: 55) that scientific statements are often “as if” “true”. As sometimes in Classical Physics, we presume such vacuum to continue our agenda for model-theoretic approach. In case of Linguistic TR, Chomsky’s “ideal” speaking subject stands in a vacuum. Chomsky’s TR is like this: “Context free ideal creative speaking subject with zero history”, on the other hand in another TR, one may postulate, “Context-sensitive creative speaking corporeal with history (childhood configuration etc.)”. In Science, we generally idealize a formula by considering “other” variables as non-existent entities. In Cricket , we can say, without any hesitation that Shane Warne is continuing his 6.5 over. What is the status of .5 in six-balls’ over? If Wittgenstein is to be believed, mathematics is a practice, performance of a community. For Wittgenstein, communalism of mathematics is determined by the communities’ convenience and necessity. In case of Economics, I can write “3 goats= 1 cow or “one apartment= $ 200000” by adding some sufficient causes. How do I put the sign= in between two unequal things? Questioning the equalizing effect of a sign as a dangerous supplement, a properly signed signifier called money, is prohibited within economics’ TR. I am representing the presentations of a priori, though it is neither analytical a priori, nor the synthetic one, but something called historical a priori—an a priori approximated by the historical incidences and they get epistemic status within a ghetto of a TR. I had then switched over to some problems of ordinary language, the problem of fuzzy numerals in Bangla, which, from Logical Positivist perspective, is illogical. (cf. Paper ID=7802) If I do not like one TR, let me take it as a legitimate possibility without any commitment and on the other hand, if I feel comfort in one of these TRs, let me commit myself to that particular TR. Alternatively, we may swing from one TR to another TR. What I was paraphrasing here is nothing but the re-reading of Jaina pluralism by Krishnachandra a

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay on Apr 04, 2012
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
See more
See less

05/13/2014

 
5
OHSSOD ILQDZ7 !HO(OLKHJ!Z( LB SYTSA&YLLF!Z(CDIE]YEZEC IENCXL]ECAXEXHnchen Zseshzshjeo Hnzshstsd@lo`eseOhssod IlqdzFeorhne Ydxnlocz!ztnk ix ]dsd Zddkdy 5829(
 Ohssod ilqdz ln sad ahoozhcd/ Ohssod ilqdz fecd lb shj`x sej`x Ohssod ilqdz ln sad ahoozhcd/ Ohssod ilqdz eoo sad zefd/Sadyd+z e kyddn lnd enc e }hn` lnd Enc e iotd lnd enc e xdool{ lnd Enc sadx+yd eoo fecd lts lb shj`x sej`x Enc sadx eoo oll` gtzs sad zefd. Enc sad }dl}od hn sad altzdz Eoo {dns sl sad tnhrdyzhsx[adyd sadx {dyd }ts hn ilqdz Enc sadx jefd lts eoo sad zefd Enc sadyd+z cljslyz enc oe{xdyz Enc itzhndzz dqdjtshrdz Enc sadx+yd eoo fecd lts lb shj`x sej`x Enc sadx eoo oll` gtzs sad zefd. Enc sadx eoo }oex ln sad klob jltyzd Enc cyhn` sadhy feyshnhz cyx Enc sadx eoo aerd }ydssx jahocydn Enc sad jahocydn kl sl zjallo/ Enc sad jahocydn kl sl ztffdy jef} Enc sadn sl sad tnhrdyzhsx[adyd sadx eyd }ts hn ilqdz Enc sadx jlfd lts eoo sad zefd. Enc sad ilxz kl hnsl itzhndzz Enc feyyx enc yehzd e befhox Hn ilqdz fecd lb shj`x sej`x Enc sadx eoo oll` gtzs sad zefd/Sadyd+z e kyddn lnd enc e }hn` lnd
 
9
 Enc e iotd lnd enc e xdool{ lnd Enc sadx+yd eoo fecd lts lb shj`x sej`x Enc sadx eoo oll` gtzs sad zefd.
[lycz enc ftzhj ix Feorhne Ydxnlocz.Jl}xyhkas 5829/ Zjaylcdy Ftzhj Jlf}enx
Adyd H ef ydhsdyeshnk Nhdswzjad
 ‚
sytsa&zdd`hnk hz e chzdezd
 ‚
{hoo sl `nl{ odecz sl {hoo }l{dy.Drdn sadn/ {d aerd sytsa yllfz !SY( enc {d eyd jdodiyeshnk lty sytsa joehfz hb hs odecz sl
‛bltnceshlneo‑ ‛lyhkhneo‑ `nl{odckd iezd. Saltka {d eyd cdjlyeshnk lty SYz {hsa sad }hdjdz lb 
lty jdodiyesdc btncefdnseo `nl{odckd/ {d cl nls sahn` saes hs odecz sl btncefdnseohzf. Fx SYhz sytd hn sad sytd zdnzd lb sad sdyf enc Fx SY zt}}ohdz
btncefdnseo 
`nl{odckd enc xds hs hz nlsbtncefdnseohzf% [d eyd blool{hnk/ dhsady hn lty cex&sl&cex ohbd&z}ejdz/ ly hn lty zseshzs&z}ejd lyhn lty ejecdfhj ly edzsadshj ohbd&z}ejdz/ chbbdydns SYz/ `nl{hnkox ly tn`nl{hnkox/ iezhjz lb enxbtncefdnseo SY ly SYz ejjoehfhnk saes lnox fx {esja hz ytnnhnk yhkasox. [adn H ef iyenchnklnd SY ez btncefdnseohzs SY/ H cl nls jlnzhcdy fx SY ez btncefdnseohzs SY/ saltka hs hzbtncefdnseo }hdjd lb {ly` enc H ef eozl e btncefdnseo sytsa&zdd`dy. Ef H zddhnk fx jhrho
hwdc 
fhyyly&hfekd/ {adn H ef iyenchnk lsady ez zerekd/ sdyylyhzs/ ly btncefdnseohzs<Blool{hnk Feorhne Ydxnlocz/ H {ens sl jeoo eoo sadzd SYz ez ohssod ilqdz. [hsahn sahz ohssod ilq lySY lb lnd rdkdseyhen/ eoo sad enhfeo }ylsdhnz/ lnhln enc
ftzty ceo 
eyd }ylahihsdc enc enlsadyrdkdseyhen sahn`z z,ad jen jlnztfd lnhln enc
ftzty ceo 
eolnk {hsa dkk enc zshoo }ydzdyrdzrdkdseyhen zsestz ejjlychnk ahz,ady {lyoc&rhd{z. Hn jezd lb cdsdyfhnhnk sad zdfenshj zsestz lb
sad sdyf ‛rdkdseyhen‑/ eyd {d ydecx sl hnjly}lyesd s{l SYz lb s{l rdkdseyhenz/ ly sad ‛fdenhnk‑
lb sad sdyf hz sl id cdjhcdc }lzhshrdox/ blyfeoox enc cdsdyfhnhzshjeoox ix sdyfhneshnk sad zdjlncrdkdseyhen ez rdkdseyhen< [adyd eyd sad dnsyx&}lhnsz lb ztja SYz< [adyd ohdz sad jolztyd lb
ztja SYz< Ly/ sadx —eoo oll` gtzs sad zefd‒<
Enx{ex/ sad }ydzdyreshln lb sadzd chbbdydns ohssod ilqdz hz e }yliodf sl fd enc hn sahz }e}dy/ H{hoo syx sl tncdyzsenc hs hn ydbdydnjd sl sad bltnceshlneo utdzshlnz lb zjhdnshbhj hnrdzshkeshln. FxOhssod Ilq khrdz fd jlfblys/ zdjtyhsx/ dezd enc zhftosendltzox }ylrhcdz fd {hsa ztbbljeshln/hnzdjtyhsx/ enc chzjlfblys. Sahz rdyx ftja joetzsyl}alihj cd}dncdnjd ln e zhnkod SY fe`dzfd ydfdfidy lb e khens/ Cefezsdz ly lsady{hzd ]yl`ytzsdz/ {al oehc eoo atfen idhnkz ln ahz
idc enc sadn —ol} sadf ly yej` sadf lts sl fe`d bhs hs.‒ Eyd sadzd Ohssod Ilqdz ]yl`ytzsden Idc<
 
:
Ods tz zjytshnhwd zlfd SYz hn sahz ydkeyc hn ydbdydnjd sl chbbdydns ejecdfhj chzjh}ohndz
 ‚
sadchzjh}ohndz jesdklyhwdc ejjlychnk sl sad nlyf lb ejecdfhj idetyljyezx ly ejecdfhjecfhnhzsyeshln.Ods tz zseys {hsa Joezzhjeo ]axzhjz. F. Yltkds eyktdc !jhsdc hn Aloohz/ 58837 44( saes zjhdnshbhj
zsesdfdnsz eyd lbsdn —ez hb‒ —sytd‒. Aloohz !hihc(/ blool{hnk Yltkds/ doeilyesdc hs {hsa —sad
ejjd}sdc ax}lsadzhz saes sad ejjdodyeshln lb e ilcx cyl}}dc hn e rejttf hz jlnzsens k !eilts:9 bdds }dy zdjlnc }dy zdjlnc ln deysa(/ hf}oxhnk saes sad chzsenjd !z( syerdodc ebsdy s zdjlnczhz khrdn ix sad blyftoe z65,9 ks
9
. [adn sad blyftoe hz e}}ohdc sl reyhltz ligdjsz cyl}}dc bylfreyhltz adhkasz hn sad deysa esflz}adyd/ hs hz bltnc sl aloc/ flyd ly odzz/ hn tzdbtoox fenx itsnls eoo jezdz.
Hs jen sadydblyd id zsesdc7 tncdy e {hcd yenkd lb jhyjtfzsenjdz/ ilchdz saes beoo hn sadejsteo esflz}adyd idaerd ez hb sadx eyd beoohnk hn e rejttf. Hn sad oenktekd zl jlfflnhn Djlnlfhjz/ sahz {ltoc id ye}hcox syenzoesdc hnsl7 sad blyftoe ezztfdz e rejttf. Xds hs
jodeyox cldz nl ztja sahnk•. sad blyftoe hz ejjd}sdc idjetzd hs {ly`z/ nls idjetzd {d
ohrd hn e}}ylqhfesd rejttf
 – 
{aesdr
dy saes fdenz. !584:/ }.51(‖
Ods tz syx sl tncdyzsenc sahz eizsyejshln {hsa e }l}toey dqef}od. Lnjd Ztnho Kerez`eyjlffdnsdc ln e }eyshjtoey cd}olxfdns lb e zlbs{eyd
Ae{` dxd. Sahz z}djheo zlbs{eyd {ez
cd}olxdc hn sad Fhnh [lyoc Jt} !9==9( sl }ydchjs —Odk Idblyd [hj`ds‒
&cdjhzhln ez hs zal{z sad}lzzhiod syegdjslyx lb sad jyhj`ds ieoo !{adsady hs ahsz sad {hj`ds ly nls(. Kerez`ey }lhnsdc lts saessad zlbs{eyd chc nls jltns sad reyheiodz oh`d sad jaeyejsdy lb zlho !sad }hsja(/ sad chydjshln encz}ddc lb sa
d {hnc/ sad adhkas lb sad il{ody‑z aenc enc ahz,ady kyh} !kyh} hz zdoclf lrdys( dsj.Saltka Ae{` dxd hz —hcdeo‒ zlbs{eyd/ hs hz nls zthseiod bly sad —}yejshjeo‒ cdjhzhln ln OI[ ez hs
cldz nls se`d hnsl ejjltns ztja reyheiodz. Saltka/ hn Zjhdnjd/ {d kdndyeoox hcdeohwd e blyftoe
ix jlnzhcdyhnk —lsady‒ reyheiodz ez nln
&dqhzsdns dnshshdz !zex/ bly dqef}od/ sad z{hnkhnk lbchbbdydns }dnctotfz hn chbbdydns ydkhlnz lb sad deysa.(.Hn Jyhj`ds / {d jen zex/ {hsalts enx adzhseshln saes Zaend [eynd hz jlnshnthnk ahz 2.4 lrdy.[aes hz sad zsestz lb .4 hn zhq&
ieooz‑ lrdy< Drdn es sad flfdns lb jeojtoeshnk jyhj`dsdyz‑ jeyddy erdyekdz/ sahz .4 }ydzdyrdz hsz zsestz ejjlychnk sad Jyhj`ds jlfftnhsx‑z jlnrdnshln.
Hb [hsskdnzsdhn hz sl id idohdrdc/ fesadfeshjz hz e }yejshjd/ }dyblyfenjd&& fesadfeshjz hz
zlfdsahnk {d cl/ enc {d jltoc gtzs ez {doo cl hs enx lsady {ex/ fesadfeshjhen‑z SY hz eozl e
Ohssod Ilq. Lnd jltoc {yhsd 59+5653 ez hn fx e}eysfdns sadyd hz nl sahysddnsa bolly ez ejjlychnk

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->