___________
No. 12-______________
I
N
T
HE
Supreme Court of the United States
————
Cody Robert Judy,
Petitioner
,v.Barrack ObamaBrian Kemp
Respondent(s)
————
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court for the Eleventh Circuit
————
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
CODY ROBERT JUDYPro se
Petitioner
3031 So. Ogden Ave.Suite 2Ogden, UT. 84403www.codyjudy.us(801)497-6655codyjudy@hotmail.com__________MICHAEL JABLONSKI
Counsel of Record for
BARACKOBAMA
260Brighton Road NEAtlanta, GA. 30309-1523404- 290-2977michael.jablonski@comcast.net
CAM-ANH LE
Crt. of State acting as
Counsel of Record for
BRIANKEMP VINCENT ROBERT RUSSOExecutive Office 214 State CapitalAtlanta GA. 30334cale@sos.ga.gov, vrusso@sos.ga.gov
Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com - www.BirtherReport.com
ii
I.
QUESTIONS OF LAW THAT MIGHT BE DECIDED:
1-
Question
–
Are or should the respective State Political [ Democratic] Parties andthe Federal Elections Commission [be] bound to the candidate office qualificationsspecified and demanded by the United States Constitution, based upon the State andFederal funds used by such organizations promoting membership and public trust inState Primaries and General Elections, as they are currently bullying PrimaryElections by certifications of Constitutionally unqualified candidates to Secretaries of
State; and should the Secretary of State‟s not also be bound to the Constitution
upon
their oaths‟ and the public trust to secure in this case Federal elections, to diligently
prohibit unqualified candidates from getting on the Ballot in Primaries, expressingpreference of candidates for electorates to champion who may not be qualified to the
Republic‟s peril?
2-
Question - Is Respondent candidate Mr. Barack Obama eligible for the Office of
President according to the United States Constitution‟s demands for a „natural borncitizen‟, with self revealed documented foreign allegiances of na
tural identity on hisreleased long form birth certificate,(last page exhibit appendix) also reported asconstituting probable cause for fraud and forgery by Sheriff law enforcement agenciesCold Case Posse to the Superior Court, by F.E.C. 2012 Registered DemocraticCandidate for President Cody Robert Judy, whom also disputed candidate R.-AZ. Sen.
McCain‟s and D. Ill. Sen. Obama‟s qualifications in 2008, asserting the harm of
constitutional unfairness through campaign expenditures, and contributions to the
unqualified candidate(s) in the publics‟ trust of the State Primaries and General
Elections of 2012?
3-
Question - Does evidence provided to the Court by Petitioner of a Sheriff LawEnforcement Report (Appendix pg.16) constituting probable cause of fraud and forgery
of Candidate Barack Obama‟s identity papers for qualification of the Office of Presidentcasting reasonable doubt on candidate‟s qualifications, if avoided by the Court, not
constitute reprisal grounds for the release and pardon of all convicted of similar crimesfor equal Justice under the law?
iii
II.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Mr. Cody Robert Judy, qualified and registered F.E.C., Candidate for U.S.President in the Democratic Party in harmony with Dec 22
nd
2011 findings of the
1
Federal 9
th
Circuit Court of Appeals which recognized standing precedent in theeligibility arena of the demands of the Constitution for the office of President, in
Barnett v. Obama
1
,and also a voter under
O.C.G.A. § 21-2-6 stating
“
any vo
ter”
eligible to vote for such candidate may challenge the qualifications of a candidate, hasappealed to Administrative Courts in New Hampshire and Georgia and State appealCourts respectfully citing disqualifying factors as evidence released by Barack Obamain contrast to qualification demands of the Constitution for the Office of the President
for a „natural born citizen‟ that have been circumvented in candidate Barack Obama‟s
instance by the Democratic Party, the lower courts, and State Secretaries to the
Republic‟s peril and the hurt of his campaign f
or President being included on ballots,campaign expenditures, and contributions made to an illegal candidate which might
have otherwise been given to his campaign. Mr. Judy‟s evidences have included expert
witnesses and law enforcement investigations and come to the Court in time andripeness with 5 months left before the September 2012 National Democratic Party
convention, that its „supervisory powers‟ might alter lower court decisions discrepant
with prec
edent and the U.S. Constitution‟s demands meriting review.
________________________________
1
(Even the political candidates who lost to Obama in 2008 would only have had standing to sue if they had filed their complaint alleging unfair competition from an ineligible candidate before theelection, the 9th Circuit judges said.) (The court said, and the defeated candidates "cannot claimcompetitive standing because they were no longer candidates when they filed their complaint."
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Judy v Obama/Kemp - Petition for Writ of Certiorari - U.S. Supreme Court - 4/5/2012
Judy v Obama/Kemp - Petition for Writ of Certiorari - U.S. Supreme Court - 4/5/2012 - http://www.BirtherReport.com
894
Reads
2
Readcasts
32
Embed Views
Get Scribd Mobile
To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
We'll never share your phone number.
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
