Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
 
February
 
16,
 
2012
 
The
 
Honorable
 
Harry
 
Reid
 
The
 
Honorable
 
Mitch
 
McConnell
 
Senate
 
Majority
 
Leader
 
Senate
 
Minority
 
Leader
 
522
 
Hart
 
Senate
 
Office
 
Building
 
317
 
Russell
 
Senate
 
Office
 
Building
 
Washington,
 
D.C.
 
20510
 
Washington,
 
D.C.
 
20510
 
Dear
 
Majority
 
Leader
 
Reid
 
and
 
Minority
 
Leader
 
McConnell:
 
The
 
Senior
 
Executives
 
Association
 
(SEA)
 
represents
 
the
 
interests
 
of 
 
career
 
federal
 
executives
 
in
 
government,
 
including
 
those
 
in
 
the
 
Senior
 
Executive
 
Service
 
(SES)
 
and
 
in
 
equivalent
 
positions,
 
such
 
as
 
Senior
 
Level
 
and
 
Scientific
 
and
 
Professional
 
positions.
 
We
 
write
 
to
 
express
 
strong
 
concern
 
with
 
the
 
provisions
 
in
 
S.
 
2038
 
(the
 
STOCK
 
Act),
 
as
 
amended
 
by
 
the
 
House,
 
that
 
would
 
unnecessarily
 
and
 
detrimentally
 
affect
 
career
 
Senior
 
Executives.
 
In
 
the
 
version
 
of 
 
S.
 
2038
 
as
 
passed
 
by
 
the
 
House,
 
career
 
Senior
 
Executives
 
would
 
be
 
subject
 
to
 
prompt
 
reporting
 
of 
 
financial
 
transactions
 
and
 
their
 
financial
 
disclosure
 
forms
 
would
 
be
 
made
 
public
 
through
 
a
 
website
 
maintained
 
by
 
the
 
Office
 
of 
 
Government
 
Ethics
 
(OGE).
 
Section
 
6
 
of 
 
the
 
bill
 
requires
 
that
 
not
 
later
 
than
 
30
 
days
 
after
 
receiving
 
notification
 
of 
 
a
 
transaction,
 
Senior
 
Executives
 
must
 
file
 
a
 
report
 
of 
 
the
 
transaction.
 
Section
 
11
 
(b)
 
requires
 
OGE
 
to
 
create
 
a
 
public
 
website
 
and
 
database
 
of 
 
financial
 
disclosure
 
reports
 
filed
 
by
 
executive
 
branch
 
employees.
 
Each
 
of 
 
these
 
provisions
 
is
 
troubling
 
and
 
unnecessarily
 
applicable
 
to
 
career
 
federal
 
employees.
 
One
 
of 
 
SEA’s
 
primary
 
concerns
 
with
 
the
 
STOCK
 
Act
 
is
 
its
 
attempt
 
to
 
equate
 
career
 
federal
 
employees
 
with
 
Members
 
of 
 
Congress,
 
or
 
even
 
political
 
appointees.
 
SEA
 
is
 
unaware
 
of 
 
instances
 
where
 
career
 
Senior
 
Executives
 
have
 
been
 
subject
 
to
 
insider
 
trading
 
accusations.
 
While
 
we
 
cannot
 
guarantee
 
that
 
it
 
has
 
not
 
occurred,
 
we
 
believe
 
that
 
overall,
 
career
 
Senior
 
Executives
 
have
 
little
 
desire
 
or
 
opportunity
 
to
 
engage
 
in
 
the
 
activities
 
addressed
 
by
 
the
 
legislation.
 
Moreover,
 
current
 
reporting
 
requirements
 
are
 
sufficient
 
to
 
address,
 
remedy
 
and
 
prosecute
 
any
 
wrong
doing
 
that
 
may
 
occur.
 
SEA
 
understands
 
the
 
desire
 
to
 
bring
 
transparency
 
to
 
the
 
financial
 
disclosures
 
of 
 
publicly
 
elected
 
officials.
 
What
 
we
 
do
 
not
 
agree
 
with
 
is
 
applying
 
such
 
broad
 
standards
 
to
 
career
 
federal
 
employees.
 
Currently,
 
Senior
 
Executives
 
and
 
equivalent
 
senior
 
level
 
employees
 
are
 
required
 
to
 
file
 
annually
 
financial
 
disclosure
 
reports
 
(OGE
 
Form
 
278).
 
Although
 
not
 
available
 
on
 
a
 
public
 
website,
 
members
 
of 
 
the
 
public
 
can
 
access
 
this
 
information
 
through
 
a
 
requesting
 
process
 
to
 
77 K Street N.E., Suite 2600 • Washington, D.C. 20002 • (202) 927-7000 • Fax (202) 927-5192 • www.seniorexecs.org
the voice of career federal executives since 1980
 
OGE.
 
On
 
that
 
form,
 
they
 
are
 
already
 
required
 
to
 
report
 
purchase,
 
sales
 
and
 
exchange
 
of 
 
stocks,
 
bonds,
 
commodity
 
futures
 
and
 
other
 
securities
 
when
 
the
 
amount
 
exceeds
 
$
 
1,000.
 
As
 
far
 
as
 
SEA
 
is
 
aware,
 
there
 
are
 
no
 
documented
 
problems
 
with
 
access
 
to
 
this
 
information
 
or
 
with
 
the
 
disclosures
 
themselves.
 
The
 
current
 
system
 
provides
 
the
 
necessary
 
oversight
 
and
 
transparency
 
to
 
ensure
 
career
 
Senior
 
Executives
 
are
 
making
 
proper
 
financial
 
disclosures.
 
Attempts
 
to
 
broaden
 
public
 
access
 
as
 
dictated
 
through
 
the
 
STOCK
 
Act
 
appear
 
to
 
be
 
a
 
solution
 
in
 
search
 
of 
 
a
 
problem.
 
Requiring
 
financial
 
disclosure
 
forms
 
to
 
be
 
publicly
 
accessible
 
and
 
searchable
 
through
 
a
 
website
 
raises
 
a
 
host
 
of 
 
issues.
 
First
 
and
 
foremost,
 
it
 
appears
 
to
 
be
 
a
 
gross
 
violation
 
of 
 
the
 
spirit
 
of 
 
the
 
Privacy
 
Act.
 
As
 
you
 
know,
 
the
 
Privacy
 
Act
 
of 
 
1974
 
was
 
promulgated
 
to
 
regulate
 
federal
 
government
 
record
 
keeping
 
and
 
disclosure
 
and
 
recognizes
 
instances
 
where
 
information
 
should
 
be
 
exempt
 
from
 
disclosure.
 
While
 
the
 
public
 
can
 
access
 
OGE
 
Form
 
278,
 
we
 
can
 
envision
 
legitimate
 
reasons
 
why
 
making
 
financial
 
disclosure
 
forms
 
of 
 
federal
 
employees
 
so
 
readily
 
available
 
to
 
the
 
public
 
could
 
not
 
only
 
hurt
 
an
 
individual’s
 
right
 
to
 
privacy,
 
but
 
could
 
also
 
prove
 
outright
 
harmful.
 
For
 
instance,
 
Foreign
 
Service
 
officers
 
or
 
other
 
federal
 
employees
 
serving
 
abroad
 
could
 
come
 
under
 
easy
 
scrutiny
 
by
 
foreign
 
interests,
 
including
 
terrorists.
 
And
 
supervisors
 
within
 
a
 
federal
 
agency
 
could
 
be
 
subject
 
to
 
unwarranted
 
personal
 
scrutiny
 
by
 
their
 
subordinates,
 
causing
 
tension
 
and
 
problems
 
in
 
the
 
workplace.
 
Other
 
concerns
 
with
 
a
 
disclosure
 
website
 
are
 
more
 
technical.
 
It
 
appears
 
to
 
SEA
 
that
 
it
 
would
 
be
 
a
 
complex
 
undertaking
 
for
 
OGE
 
to
 
create
 
the
 
type
 
of 
 
website
 
proposed
 
in
 
the
 
legislation.
 
Further,
 
we
 
suspect
 
that
 
extensive
 
resources
 
(both
 
funding
 
and
 
personnel)
 
would
 
be
 
required
 
to
 
create
 
such
 
a
 
database.
 
Given
 
the
 
current
 
budget
 
climate,
 
we
 
question
 
whether
 
this
 
is
 
an
 
appropriate
 
use
 
of 
 
OGE’s
 
resources.
 
Finally,
 
we
 
believe
 
these
 
new
 
requirements
 
and
 
the
 
database
 
itself 
 
would
 
engender
 
an
 
increased
 
level
 
of 
 
requests
 
for
 
ethics
 
guidance
 
by
 
federal
 
employees
 
to
 
OGE,
 
putting
 
a
 
strain
 
on
 
OGE’s
 
ethics
 
officials
 
and
 
designated
 
agency
 
ethics
 
officials.
 
With
 
diminishing
 
resources,
 
this
 
requirement
 
will
 
undoubtedly
 
lack
 
the
 
capacity
 
for
 
full
 
or
 
effective
 
compliance.
 
In
 
terms
 
of 
 
the
 
30
 
day
 
reporting
 
requirement
 
for
 
financial
 
transactions,
 
we
 
also
 
question
 
the
 
necessity
 
and
 
rationale
 
for
 
expanding
 
coverage
 
to
 
career
 
federal
 
employees.
 
As
 
with
 
the
 
financial
 
disclosures,
 
it
 
does
 
not
 
appear
 
that
 
a
 
lack
 
of 
 
reporting
 
on
 
each
 
financial
 
transaction
 
has
 
led
 
to
 
documented
 
insider
 
trading
 
problems
 
within
 
the
 
career
 
SES.
 
Furthermore,
 
such
 
reporting
 
requirements
 
are
 
burdensome
 
and
 
complex.
 
Senior
 
Executives
 
could
 
easily
 
fall
 
afoul
 
of 
 
the
 
requirements
 
without
 
realizing
 
they
 
have
 
done
 
so.
 
If 
 
a
 
Senior
 
Executive
 
uses
 
a
 
financial
 
advisor
 
or
 
portfolio
 
manager,
 
he
 
or
 
she
 
might
 
not
 
get
 
word
 
of 
 
individual
 
financial
 
transactions
 
within
 
the
 
30
 
day
 
window,
 
or
 
have
 
the
 
ability
 
to
 
receive
 
the
 
necessary
 
information
 
to
 
make
 
reports
 
on
 
individual
 
transactions.
 
Overall,
 
SEA
 
believes
 
that
 
such
 
extensive,
 
burdensome
 
and
 
public
 
reporting
 
requirements
 
will
 
have
 
a
 
chilling
 
effect
 
on
 
those
 
employees
 
considering
 
entering
 
the
 
SES.
 
We
 
question
 
why
 
anyone
 
would
 
want
 
to
 
subject
 
themselves
 
to
 
such
 
broad,
 
unnecessary
 
scrutiny.
 
If 
 
the
 
intent
 
of 
 
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more