WHAT WILL THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENT DO?Representative Paul StamNC House Majority LeaderFebruary 2012On May 8, 2012 the voters will decide whether this provision should be added tothe State Constitution:“Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union thatshall be valid or recognized in this State. This Section does not prohibit a privateparty from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this sectionprohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to suchcontracts.”This Marriage Amendment would recognize only domestic legal unions betweenone man and one woman. Domestic partnerships or civil unions, whether opposite-sex orsame-sex, would not be valid or recognized here. The Amendment would prohibit thegovernment from creating “same sex marriage”The meaning of “legal union” as a judicially recognized status is concrete andclear in the context of family relationships. In federal law, “’marriage’ means only alegal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife…” 1 U.S.C. §7(2005). This definition of marriage in federal law is consistent with the long-standingdefinition: marriage is the “[l]egal union of one man and one woman as husband andwife.” BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 876 (5
th
ed. 1979). The word “domestic” wasadded to the words “legal union” to clarify that other legal arrangements, such asbusiness partnerships, would not be affected by this amendment.Any benefits extended by government to a person based on a domestic legal unionother than marriage would be prohibited. But Government could still extend employmentbenefits that impact or benefit non-married domestic households. The extension of suchbenefits, however, could not be predicated only upon the status of a domestic relationshipother than marriage. For example, a city could still allow an employee to pick one otherperson of his or her choice to be the beneficiary for health insurance.The second sentence of the Amendment makes clear that the Amendment wouldnot prohibit private companies from entering into private contracts based on relationshipschosen by the company. Private employers, for example, could continue to offerdomestic partnership or civil union benefits to an employee’s same sex or opposite sexpartner. The Amendment would prohibit the government from forcing a company toprovide such benefit.During the debate I was amazed at the baseless claims made by opponents.Several continue to be repeated by the media. Let’s set the record straight: