Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
ct_255377_2

ct_255377_2

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2 |Likes:
Published by Arvind Kumar

More info:

Published by: Arvind Kumar on Apr 10, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/10/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Truck Components
Supplier:
name
Part Name:
name
Engineering ChangeLevel:
number
Expected PPAPSubmission Date:
date
Eaton Supplie
CategoryPPAP Submission ItemsR Y GRequiredReportedComments
1.
 
Design RecordsEaton print revision
 
ynumber 
 Applicable Eaton engineering specs
g
0
(type in spec here, add rows as needed)
gn
 Applicable Critical Characteristics
g
0
Only if CTQ's this part(type in CTQ here, add rows as needed)
gn
Materials or components:(type in mat'l or PN here, add rows as needed)
yy
Count of ECN in-process vs. ECN covered in this PPAP
gn
Pending ECN
gn
 Approved Deviations
gn
Pending Deviations
gn
Rejected Deviations
gn
SREA 
gn
CP reflects applicable engineering change documents
gn
FMEA reflects applicable engineering change documents
gn
Supplier DFMEA 
gn
Only if supplier designed partDFMEA revision level
gn
Process flow rev level
yy
Must have a rev level definedIncludes incoming material
yy
Count of inside processesTo be defined by supplierCount of outside/sub-contracted processesTo be defined by supplierPackaging
yy
Include detailed packaging planw/submissionQA 
yy
Shipping
yy
 AIAG format
yy
FMEA rev. level
yy
Must have a rev level definedCount of Critical characteristics
g0
Count of inside processes
g0
Count of outside/sub-contracted processes
g0
Failure modes equal for all similar processes
yy
Count w/Severity ranked 9 or 10 w/actions in place.Severity >8 requires CTop 3 overall RPNs with actions in place
yy
Severity, occurrence and Detection according to the table of  AIAG
yy
Usage of poka-yokes;
yy
Lack of poka-yoke requires explanationIf it is a resubmission, review revision history
yy
Supplier to provide historyWhere applicable, supplier DFMEA and former quality recordsused to do the PFMEA 
gn
"Potential Failure Modes" listed are specifically for theirrespective process step
yy
"Potential Effects of Failure" are specifically for theirrespective "Failure mode"
yy
"Potential Causes . . Of Failure" are specifically for theirrespective "Failure mode"
yy
"Prevention" controls are valid prevention methods for eachrespective "Failure Mode"
yy
"Detection" controls are valid for detection methods for eachrespective "Failure Mode"
yy
 AIAG format being used;
yy
Count of inside processes
g0
Count of outside/sub-contracted processes
g0
 All fields filled out (tolerances, specs, linked to standards,etc.);
yy
SPC used for all CTQ/MKC/KCC/Critical characteristics;
gn
Robust and real reaction plan to protect Eaton;
yy
 Alignment with the rest of the documents (Flow diagram,FMEA, etc.)
yy
Controls aligned with the PFMEA;
yy
Finish dimensional and tolerances matches the drawing;
yy
Inspection frequencies are appropriate;
yy
Count of gagesTo be defined by supplierIn accordance with the TSP no.7 and no. 10 (Poka-yokes andOEM Touch points) NOTE: Provide the Supplier with theserequirements;
yy
Count of all equipment / measuring devices / testers utilizedin identifying acceptability of product, and also for the criticalcharacteristics
g0
Count of measurements requiring MSA 
g0
Measurement method matches the gages in control plan;
yy
MSA done using production parts not with using masters;
yy
Bias, Linearity, Stability and gage R&R 
yy
8.
 
Measurement System Analysis (MSA)6.
 
Process FMEA 7.
 
Control Plan4.
 
Design FMEA 5.
 
Process Flow Diagrams2.
 
Engineering ChangeDocuments3.
 
Customer Engineering ApprovalReason For Submission:
New
Start of Production:
date or TBD
PPAP Level (2 - 5):
number 2 - 5
Part Number:
number 
 
Truck Components
Supplier:
name
Part Name:
name
Engineering ChangeLevel:
number
Expected PPAPSubmission Date:
date
Eaton Supplie
CategoryPPAP Submission ItemsR Y GRequiredReportedComments
Reason For Submission:
New
Start of Production:
date or TBD
PPAP Level (2 - 5):
number 2 - 5
Part Number:
number 
Count of devices w/R&R below 30%; >30% requires Reactionplan
 
g0
Count of dimensions/features checked on current print.Count of critical characteristics on current print.
g0
 All features within spec?
yy
Count of pieces in full layout
y2
Parts per cycle (no or cavities, molds, etc) vs. parts inspectedBallooned print matches dimensional report
yy
Materials Testing is required
gn
Functional testing (PV) is required
gn
Report is submitted by certified laboratory
gn
Inspection reports complete
gn
Performance report data (per Eaton PS)
gn
Written notification by Eaton Engineering Representative if Material / Test report is not required
gn
Count of pieces processed in pilot run
y30
Count of pieces per cycleCount of pieces in capability studies (30-pcs standard)
g0
Count of CTQ's on current print.
g0
X-R bar chart / range bar chart at least per eachcharacteristic (Stability and normality included on the IPS)
gn
Statistical method was Eaton approved
gn
Count of features >=1.67 Cpk 
gn
 All laboratories are ISO/IEC 17025 certified
gn
Certifications are current
gn
Count of features on AAR 
g0
Complies with customer standards
gn
Report approved
gn
Count of pcs submitted
y30
Packaging is appropriate for this part
yy
Parts are properly identified as PPAP samples
yy
Each sample identified and correlates to dimensional report
yy
Parts were processed in the permanent mfg. process
yy
Sample is required per APQP
gn
Determined during APQP processMaster Sample is properly identified including mfg date,dimensional report, cavity, mold, etc.
yy
Storage location is suitable to maintain integrity of sample
yy
 Validation process is defined and schedule established
yy
 Validation records are maintained
yy
Master is visually color-coded as PASS (Green) or FAIL (Red)
yy
Reaction plan is published and followed, training isdocumented
yy
Evidence of IMDS submission/acceptance
yy
Packaging instructions or proposal
yy
List of Eaton-owned property: equipment/tooling/patterns
yy
Preventative Maintenance Plan (Only key equipment);
yy
 Assembly trials required
yy
Primarily required for machining, castingproductsCTQ/MKC/KCC/Critical characteristic list and indices
yy
PPAP required to be submitted in English
yy
Other established by Eaton during the Project
yy
 AIAG format is followed
yy
Part number revision level matches the drawing
ynumber 
 All fields filled out (tolerances, specs, linked to standards,etc.);
yy
"Submission results" section agrees with disposition
yy
If "Submission results" = "NO", is explanation included?
yy
 Approval of PPAP PlanSupplier Representative Name
Title Date
Customer Representative Name
Title Date
14. Sample Product(submitted w/PPAP)16.
 
Checking Aids18.
 
Part Submission Warrant(PSW)15.
 
Master Sample (retainedat Supplier location)17.
 
Records of ComplianceWith Customer SpecificRequirements12.
 
Qualified LaboratoryDocumentation13.
 
 Appearance ApprovalReport (AAR)10.
 
Material, PerformanceTest Results
(100%Conformance to all Materialand Performance Testingrequirements per EATONEng Spec)
11.
 
Initial Process Studies9.
 
Dimensional Results
 
 Add special notes here. Description of Level 4 requirements.
 
Eaton PPAP Preparation ChecklistPurpose:
The purpose of this workbook is to provide a tool for the supplier to compare thecontent of their PPAP to the expectations of Eaton for the part.
Scope:
List the technical documents related to the part; engineering drawings, specs, etc.Communicate the general Eaton expectations for the PPAP completion.This document does not supersede any engineering document or specfication,nor does it take precedence over the WISPER system.
Instructions:
Refer to the data in column E for the Eaton expected result for each PPAP item.
Note that if this cell is BLANK, Eaton has not specified a response. The supplier should enter anappropriate response.
Record the result from the Supplier PPAP in the adjacent column F.
Note that somecells are 'protected' so that entries are prevented.
If the two columns agree, then the adjacent cell in column D will be colored
GREEN
. No further action is required by the Supplier.If the two columns DO NOT agree, then the adjacent cell in column D will becolored
RED
. In this case, the Supplier must take corrective action such that thePPAP result agrees with the Eaton expected result.If the Supplier submits the PPAP with any items in disagreement, the futurecorrective action must be noted in the "Comments" column of this form and, if required, documented in an 8D included with the PPAP submission.
Eaton only: Enable protection on "part" tab prior to distribution.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->