Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
DART: Your preferred choice of transportation for now and in the future.
0410C.doc 1
Dallas Area Rapid Transit
COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE
Tuesday, April 10, 2012, 4:00 P.M. - Conference Room C
1401 Pacific Ave., Dallas, TX 75202
General Items:
1. Approval of Minutes: March 20, 2012
Items for Final Committee Consideration:
2. Authorization to Execute a License Agreement with Collin County for an
At-Grade Road Crossing (Security, Safety, Public Relations and
Operations Loretta Ellerbe/Norma De La Garza-Navarro) [5 minutes] @
3. Multiple Use Agreement between DART and Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) to Permit DART to Construct, Maintain and
Operate the DART LRT Orange Line within TxDOT Highway
Rights-of-Way Located on the Irving-1/Irving 2 Line Sections
(Rail Program Faye Wilkins/Tim Mckay) [5 minutes] @
4. Multiple Use Agreement between DART and Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) to Permit DART to Construct, Maintain and
Operate the DART LRT Blue Line within TxDOT Rights-of-Way Located
on the Rowlett-1 Line Section
(Rail Program Faye Wilkins/Tim McKay) [5 minutes] @
5. Exercise Contract Option for 12-Volt Maintenance-Free Bus Batteries
(Security, Safety, Public Relations and Operations Loretta
Ellerbe/Carol Wise) [5 minutes]
Quorum = 8
Agenda
DART: Your preferred choice of transportation for now and in the future.
0410C.doc 2
Items for Initial Consideration:
6. Authorization to Convey Easements to Atmos Energy Corporation for the
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Project
(Rail Program Faye Wilkins/Tim McKay) @ [5 minutes]
7. Approval of Quarterly Disclosure Update as of December 31, 2011
(Budget and Finance Robert Strauss/David Leininger) @ [5 minutes]
8. *Proposed Fare Structure Change
(Budget and Finance Robert Strauss/David Leininger) [45 minutes]
9. *Briefing on Public Security Declaratory Judgment Litigation
(David Leininger) [15 minutes]
Other Items:
10. Identification of Future Agenda Items
11. Adjournment
*Briefing item
+Same Night Board Approval Item
@ Unanimous Approval at Committee
The Committee-of-the-Whole may go into Closed Session under the Texas Open Meetings Act,
Section 551.071, Consultation with Attorney, for any Legal issues, under Section 551.072 for Real
Estate issues, or under Section 551.074 for Personnel matters, or under section 551.076, for
deliberation regarding the deployment or implementation of Security Personnel or devices, arising
regarding any item listed on this Agenda.
This facility is wheelchair accessible. For accommodations for the hearing impaired, sign
interpretation is available. Please contact Community Affairs at 214-749-2543, 48 hours in advance.
AGENDA ITEM NO.1
MINUTES
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT
COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE
March 20, 2012
The Dallas Area Rapid Transit Committee-of-the-Whole meeting convened on Tuesday,
March 20,2012, at 4:10 p.m., at DART Headquarters, 1401 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas, with
Chair Danish presiding.
The following Board members were present: John Danish, Robert Strauss, Faye Moses Wilkins,
Scott Carlson, Jerry Christian, Randall Chrisman, William Tsao, William Velasco,
Michael Cheney, Claude Williams, Loretta Ellerbe and Gary Slagel.
Mr. Richard Carrizales, Ms. Pamela Dunlop Gates, and Mr. Mark Enoch were absent.
General Items:
1. Approval of Minutes: March 6, 2012
Ms. Wilkins made a motion to approve the March 6, 2012, corrected Committee-of
the-Whole meeting Minutes.
Mr. Slagel seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
Items for Final Committee Consideration:
Consent Items:
2. Authorization to Convey DART-Owned Property Located in Rowlett to the City of
Rowlett for the Blue Line Expansion
Ms. Wilkins motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized to execute the necessary
documents to convey DART Parcels, as described in Exhibit 1, to the City of
Rowlett.
Mr. Chrisman seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
3. Authorization to Convey Easements to Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC for
the CNG Project
Ms. Wilkins motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized to execute the necessary
documents to convey easements as described in Exhibit 1, to Oncor Electric Delivery
Company LLC.
Mr. Tsao seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes.docx 1 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
4. Approve an Interlocal Agreement (lLA) between North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG), DART, and City of Dallas Related to Procurement and
Financial Matters for Implementation of the Dallas TIGER-funded Modern
Streetcar Project
Ms. Wilkins motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized, subject to legal
sufficiency review and approval, to execute an Interlocal Agreement between
NCTCOG, DART, and City of Dallas Related to Procurement and Financial
Matters for Implementation of the Dallas TIGER-funded Modern Streetcar Project,
substantially in the form attached to the resolution as Exhibit 1.
Mr. Velasco seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
5. Local Assistance Program (LAP) - Program Modification Request for the City of
Cockrell Hill
Mr. Carlson motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the Local
Assistance Program/Congestion Management System (LAP/CMS) reprogramming
request for the City of Cockrell Hill, as contained in Exhibit 1, is approved.
Mr. Tsao seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
Mr. Gary Thomas, PresidentlExecutive Director, took a moment to introduce
Ms. Carol Wise, Executive Vice President/Chief Operations Officer.
6. Contract for Inspection and Maintenance Services for Lift Equipment
Ms. Ellerbe motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized to award a three-year
contract for inspection and maintenance service for lift equipment to A & F
Elevator Company, Inc., for a total authorized amount not to exceed $575,190.
Mr. Chrisman seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
7. Contract for Bus Engine Lubricating Oils
Ms. Ellerbe motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized to award a two-year
contract for bus engine lubricating oils to Jesse P. Taylor Oil Co. for a total
authorized amount not to exceed $1,000,350.
Mr. Slagel seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
8. Contract Option for Self-insured Dental Insurance for DART Employees and Their
Eligible Dependents
Mr. Velasco motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized, subject to legal
sufficiency review and approval, to exercise a contract option for dental insurance
with Delta Dental Insurance Company [Contract No. C-I016416-01] to:
Section 1: Exercise the one-year option.
Section 2: Increase the not-to-exceed amount by $102,348, for a new total
authorized amount not to exceed $409,394.
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes.docx 2 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
Mr. Slagel seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
9. Contract Option for Self-Insured Medical Insurance for DART Employees, Retirees
and Their Eligible Dependents
Mr. Velasco motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized, subject to legal
sufficiency review and approval, to exercise a contract option for medical insurance
with Aetna [Contract No. C-1016416-03] to:
Section 1: Exercise the one-year option.
Section 2: Increase the not-to-exceed amount by $1,670,936, for a new total
authorized amount not to exceed $6,337,071.
Mr. Cheney seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
10. Initiation of Litigation to Recover Property Damage
Mr. Velasco motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
recommendation of the General Counsel to initiate litigation against
Humberto Gamino-Nunez and Acosta Construction to recover property
damage in Risk Management Claim No: R03769 is approved.
Mr. Cheney seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
11. Contract Option for Health & Welfare Consulting Services
Chair Danish stated that this was an item that was unanimously approved in the
Administrative Committee, chaired by Mr. Carrizales.
Mr. Cheney stated his concerns and inquired what is being done in the body of the
contract that is causing the increased amount. He felt that there was not enough
information to approve forwarding this item; therefore, he would vote against forwarding
it.
Chair Danish inquired as to what the time sensitivity for this issue was.
Ms. Lynda Jackson, Vice President of Human Resource, replied that she would respond
to Mr. Cheney's inquiries. Ms. Jackson briefed the committee as follows:
Health Welfare Consulting Contract Analysis
Ms. Wilkins stated she was concerned that DART would pay a person from this company
to write a Request for Proposal (RFP) that this company would be bidding on. Ms.
Jackson replied that would not occur because the DART Board had already approved the
extension item that eliminated the need to issue an RFP. Ms. Wilkins then asked if it was
standard for DART to use a consultant to write an RFP. Ms. Jackson affirmed and
clarified that it was done for both the medical and the dental.
Chair Danish inquired if this item could be revisited at the April loth meeting. Ms.
Jackson replied yes.
Ms. Wilkins asked a member of the Administrative committee to give further direction on
this item. Mr. Christian stated that Ms. Jackson had responded to the issues that the
Administrative committee had inquired about in regards to the dental and the amount of
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes. docx 3 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
the cost of the option year and the timing of the sensitive time items, if a decision was
made by the Board.
Mr. Chrisman motioned for approval of draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized to, subject to legal
sufficiency review and approval, to execute to exercise a contract option for health
and welfare benefits consulting services with Buck Consultants, LLC, [Contract No.
C-I016200-01] to:
Section 1: Extend the contract term by 6-months.
Section 2: Increase the not-to-exceed amount by $145,000, for a new total
authorized amount not to exceed $704,915. (with Minus the $55)
Mr. Slagel seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
Ms. Cheney remarked that part of the reason he became so concerned was that it seemed
that on the short time he has been on the Board that they are offered the opportunity to
approve options or extensions of contracts when the time is at an end. His concern is that
the Board is not given sufficient time to decide if an option might be extended or whether
it ought to go out as a new RFP for rebid. Mr. Cheney felt that staff ought to do a better
job of tracking where DART stands on its options and renewals of contracts in order to
get them to the Board on a timely basis. Mr. Thomas responded that a presentation was
given by Mr. John Adler, Vice President of Procurement, on this topic to the Board. He
stated that although the Board may not be approving the option year, they are approving
the dollars upfront in the agenda reports. Mr. Thomas stated that staff would back the
option approvals up so that the Board would have more time. Mr. Cheney stated that he
was not questioning the front end of the contracts when it is a three-year contract; he felt
that the Board is not given enough data and facts to make an informed decision. Mr.
Cheney requested to see a more in depth presentation on the economics of the option
period as opposed to grunt level dollars compared to base periods.
Mr. Velasco remarked that he recalled that there used to be an RFP calendar and inquired
if one was still available. Mr. Steve Salin, Vice President of Rail Planning stated that it
was now located on-line.
12. Approval of a Site-Specific Shuttle Agreement with McKinney Avenue Transit
Authority (MAT A)
Mr. Carlson moved to approval of a draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized to execute a two-year
site specific shuttle service agreement with the McKinney Avenue Transit
Authority in the amount not to exceed $650,000, and in substantially the
form shown in Exhibit 1
Mr. Tsao seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes.docx 4 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
Items for Initial Committee Consideration:
13. Authorization to Execute a License Agreement with Collin County for an At-Grade
Road Crossing
Mr. Chrisman inquired for further infonnation on the closing of two crossing that would
be credited toward this crossing.
Ms. Nonna De La Garza-Navarro, Vice President of Commuter Rail, replied that DART
had a broad policy, but have a practice of asking for two closures for everyone that is
opened.
Mr. Christian inquired if there were any legal issues due to the lack of policy. Ms. De La
Garza-Navarro restated that the DART policy was broad enough to mention the need to
eliminate or reduce the number of crossings although it does not specifically mention a
two for one crossing.
Chair Danish inquired where the location of the crossing was. Ms. De La Garza-Navarro
stated it was in Melissa, TX.
Mr. Tsao inquired as to the geographic location of the crossing. Ms. De La Garza
Navarro restated the location was approximately 38 miles from Dallas, TX.
Ms. De La Garza-Navarro briefed the committee (slides on file with the Office of Board
Support) as follows:
Map of Collin County
City of Dallas Road Closures
Mr. Tsao asked if there was a cost associated with this crossing. Ms. De La Garza
Navarro stated DART would not be responsible for any of the cost which would be
handled be Collin County.
Ms. Ellerbe motioned to move forward to the Committee of the Whole Final
Consideration Consent Agenda a draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized to execute a License
Agreement with Collin County for construction of an At-Grade Railroad crossing to
be known as Collin County Outer Loop Segment 1, as shown on Exhibit 1 to this
resolution.
Mr. Slagel seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
14. Exercise Contract Option for 12-Volt Maintenance-Free Bus Batteries
Ms. Ellerbe motioned to move forward to the Committee of the Whole Final
Consideration Individual Agenda a draft resolution stating that the
PresidentlExecutive Director or his designee is authorized to execute a contract
option for 12-volt maintenance-free batteries with Stewart and Stevenson [Contract
No. C-I017755-01] to:
Section 1: Exercise the final one-year option.
Section 2: Increase the not-to-exceed amount by $165,660, for a new total
authorized amount not to exceed $472,038.
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes.docx 5 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
Mr. Chrisman seconded the motion and the item was forwarded by a majority vote
with Mr. Cheney abstaining.
Mr. Cheney requested information on the number of batteries being purchased and the
price of batteries to confirm that comparisons are made.
15. *Current and Future Regional Transportation Council Meeting Agenda Items of
Interest to DART
Mr. Michael Miles, Senior Manager of Government Relations, briefed the Committee
(slides on file with the Office of Board Support) as follows:
RTC Meeting Update
Agenda
RTC Legislative Subcommittees
Transportation Funding Initiative Timeline
Revenue Options
Subcommittee #1 - Legislative Fundamentals
Subcommittee #2 - Partnerships
Subcommittee #3 - Funding Source
Subcommittee #4 - Legislative & Communications
Mr. Strauss entered the meeting at 5:03 p.m.
March 8 RTC Meeting
JAiRC & New Freedom Project Recommendations
Chair Danish requested that the acronyms of JARC be given. Mr. Miles replied that
JARC stood for Job Access and Reverse Commute.
Ms. Wilkins remarked that the Garland City Council questioned if DART was in
conjunction with the City of Mesquite in requesting funding for the service that DART is
providing. Mr. Todd Plesko, Vice President of Planning and Development, responded
that the City of Mesquite had made that request from the North Central Texas Council of
Government (NCTCOG) in relation to the service that DART operates in conjunction
with them; however, DART was not part of the grant. Mr. Plesko further explained that
the grants that other entities were searching for were for service that was not operated by
DART.
Mr. Slagel requested an explanation on the process for the projects. Mr. Miles explained
the process in detail.
Mr. Christian inquired how the funds were allocated to the cities' projects in regards to
the funding. Mr. Miles stated that he was unable to give an educated answer to that
question; however, he would inquire.
JAiRC & New Freedom Project Recommendations (continued)
Speedway Line Map
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes.docx 6 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
Mr. Cheney requested further information and support in regards to the Board's decision
of the City of Mesquite's service. He inquired when would the Board reevaluate its
decision. Chair Danish referenced the details of the resolution for the Mesquite service
and stated that there was no data yet to base a decision. Mr. Cheney replied he
understood all his arguments; however, Garland's City Council had requested his
presence to elaborate on DART's decision several times. Mr. Cheney stated that they
have once again requested he appear at their work session. Garland's City Council had
requested he attend the day before, unfortunately, he was unable to attend; the next
meeting date he must attend will be Monday, April 2, 2012 to justify DART Board's
actions on the Mesquite model that they had rejected. Mr. Cheney remarked that this
will be the 5
th
or 6
th
consecutive month that he has been asked to appear before the City
Council.
Mr. David Schulze, Assistant General Counsel, interjected that a complete discussion on
the Mesquite service was beyond the subject matter that was posted and counseled
against any further in-depth discussion. He encouraged that it be posted for a full
discussion at another meeting and return to the item at hand.
Chair Danish asked the Board to consider on Agenda Item 16., Identification of Future
Agenda Items, taking a majority vote in the near future on whether or not the Mesquite
model should be entertained before at least one quarter of data is received.
Mr. Cheney agreed, while he felt that Chair Danish's discussion at this point is only
related to operating costs and expense analysis. He stated it was not dealing with some
form of a capital contribution, which is the bone of contention. Mr. Cheney stated that if
the model is brought back for discussion, it should be brought back with some discussion
of that and he felt the City of Garland would be in agreement. Mr. Thomas replied that
he would have staff explain how the policy was created, which does include capital
appreciation.
Ms. Wilkins inquired, in regards to the $2B that the Texas Department of Transportation
(TxDOT) reported found, if a discussion was coming up in a forum. Mr. Miles stated that
it was announced in the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) February meeting and
that infom1ation was mentioned at that point; his understanding was that the money was
state funding that was primarily for highway commitments. Ms. Wilkins remarked that
although staff is probably working on submitting projects, if DART does not submit some
things quickly, the money will be allocated to someone else. Mr. Miles replied that Ms.
Wilkins brought up a good point. He stated that he was unsure how they could intervene,
23
rd
however, their first opportunity would be on Friday, March at the Surface
Transportation Technical Committee (STTC) meeting were the agenda items will be
reviewed again. Mr. Miles said they could raise those questions at that time. Ms.
Wilkins stated, with all due respect to the staff, sometimes she felt that DART should be
proactive especially when it comes to NCTCOG, because every time she hears a report of
what is transpiring with them, she hears it after the decisions have been made.
Mr. Chrisman opinioned that it seemed that the RTC did things their own way with no
regard for others' opinions. In regards to the 66% that should stay in Dallas County, it
somehow gets voted piecemeal into a majority for Tarrant County. Mr. Chrisman
inquired how many votes DART had. Mr. Miles explained there were a total of 43
members on the RTC and each one is a voting member. Mr. Chrisman asked if DART
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes.docx 7 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
only has one vote. Mr. Miles agreed, but elucidated that the each member city also had
representative which made it a larger entity. Mr. Chrisman inquired how many votes do
the member cities have versus the total. Mr. Miles stated the total was 18 votes of the 43
votes for the member cities. Mr. Chrisman then asked if they were meeting before the
RTC meetings occurred. Mr. Miles replied that they meet quarterly due to dealing with
elected officials and a number of DART Board members have attended these meetings.
Mr. Chrisman stated he understood the need for the quarterly meeting, however, he felt
the meetings may need to occur more often.
Ms. Ellerbe stated one of her questions was answered in regards to DART applying for
nine projects and only getting one approved, which was for bus route 404. She inquired if
the money is for reverse commute, and DART is primarily the provider, how come
DART does not receive the money. Then DART can make the arrangement with the non
member cities instead of giving it to the non-member cities to circumvent DART's
requirement to be a melnber city. Mr. Miles responded that therein lies the question of
the regional issue. Ms. Ellerbe asked if that question has ever been asked.
Mr. Slagel interjected his belief is that these are federal funds and federal funds are
required to be allocated by an Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the RTC is
the independent transportation policy body of the MPO. He stated that these were federal
funds and under those guidelines, the funds would not come to DART to allocate. Ms.
Ellerbe replied that she was not referencing to the allocation of the funds. She felt that if
someone was going to encourage reverse commute, than that someone should be paying
the provider some revenue. She felt that the alliance did not make any sense to her
either. She stated that she agreed with Mr. Chrisman's sentiments and then voiced her
concerns that a small group of people are able to determine where billions of dollars are
allocated.
Mr. Slagel remarked that the RTC should not be a mystery. He stated that it was set up
so that it is represented reasonably evenly across the region, however it does not give
favor to the transportation authorities. He understood that everyone battles with that
representation. He stated that if DART continues to be as active as possible in the
decisions that are being brought forth, then DART can make an impact on how the
process works.
Ms. Ellerbe stated that she agreed that DART needed to find a way to work together. She
remarked with all due respect to Mr. Slagel, some transit entities do get funds from the
MPO.
Mr. Tsao echoed Mr. Slagel earlier remarks. He suggested that in the future, during the
RTC Luncheons, DART ought to bring more direction on agenda items instead of
continuous briefing items. He seconded the words of Mr. Slagel and stated that DART
should be proactive in a more unified force to influence the process of the RTC.
Other Items:
16. Identification of Future Agenda Items
Chair Danish reiterated his request that the Board take a majority vote in the near future
on whether or not the Mesquite model should be entertained before at least one quarter of
data is received.
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes.docx 8 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
17. Adjournment
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 5:43 p.m.
~ ~ a
Josefina Chavira, CAP
Board/Committee Secretary
/jc
* Briefing Item
+ Same Night Item
@ Unanimous Approval at Committee
03.20.2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Minutes.docx 9 4/3/2012; 8:00 am
Agenda Report
Committee-of-the-Whole
Voting Requirements:
Majority
DATE: April 10, 2012
SUBJECT:
75
380
69
BUSINESS
78E
BUSINESS
289D
BUSINESS
289C
TEXAS
121
TEXAS
160
TEXAS
289
TEXAS
205
TEXAS
5
TEXAS
121
TEXAS
66
TEXAS
78
TEXAS
121
FARM
ROAD
544
FARM
ROAD
1378
FARM
ROAD
1193
FARM
ROAD
548
FARM
ROAD
35
FARM
ROAD
1562
FARM
ROAD
1138
FARM
ROAD
3356
FARM
ROAD
896
FARM
ROAD
455
FARM
ROAD
981
FARM
ROAD
3038
FARM
ROAD
2514
FARM
ROAD
3412
FARM
ROAD
1569
FARM
ROAD
2934
FARM
ROAD
981
FARM
ROAD
2514
FARM
ROAD
2642
FARM
ROAD
455
FARM
ROAD
1138
FARM
ROAD
3364
FARM
ROAD
2786
FARM
ROAD
428
FARM
ROAD
6
FARM
ROAD
815
FARM
ROAD
2514
FARM
ROAD
3286
FARM
ROAD
2170
FARM
ROAD
3133
FARM
ROAD
2194
FARM
ROAD
3537
FARM
ROAD
75
FARM
ROAD
544
FARM
ROAD
1778
FARM
ROAD
2756
FARM
ROAD
2755
FARM
ROAD
2478
FARM
ROAD
1777
FARM
ROAD
2551
FARM
ROAD
1461
FARM
ROAD
2933
FARM
ROAD
547
FARM
ROAD
982
FARM
ROAD
2478
FARM
ROAD
543
FARM
ROAD
1827
FARM
ROAD
545
FARM
ROAD
546
FARM
ROAD
2862
FARM
ROAD
36
FARM
ROAD
1377
FARM
ROAD
455
30
DALLAS CO
COLLIN CO
DALLAS CO
DENTON CO
ROCKWALL CO
COLLIN CO
R
O
C
K
W
A
L
L
C
O
H
U
N
T
C
O
C
O
L
L
I
N
C
O
D
E
N
T
O
N
C
O
C
O
L
L
I
N
C
O
D
E
N
T
O
N
C
O
C
O
L
L
I
N
C
O
H
U
N
T
C
O
COLLIN
CO
FANNIN
CO
COLLIN CO
GRAYSON CO
HUNT CO
FANNIN
CO
"
!
0 2 4 6 8
Miles
Source data compiled from GIS Database and the Engineering Department.
This map is a graphic representation of Collin County and
the Outer Loop Study and should only be used
for illustrative purposes. In no way should this map be used to settle any
boundary disputes or locational conflict.
November 2011
Legend
Numbered Segments
1
3
5
2
4
US 75 - SH 121
FM 6 - Rockwall Co.
DNT - US 75
US 380 - FM 6
SH 121 - US 380
Collin County
Outer Loop
License Agreement w/Collin Co for road crossing-COTW2 3/22/2012 10:08:35 AM 1
Attachment 1
DGNO Railroad
Proposed Crossing
Collin Co. Outer Loop
Exhibit 1
CityofDallasRoadClosures
Exhibit1
(page2)
FormerlyOakDownsDr.
FormerlyWaltersLn.
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
/
C
o
l
l
i
n
C
o
f
o
r
r
o
a
d
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
-
C
O
T
W
2
3
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
0
8
:
3
5
A
M
1
Agenda Report
Committee-of-the-Whole
Attachment:
1. Location Maps
Voting Requirements:
Majority
DATE: April 10, 2012
SUBJECT:
SUBJECT:
SUBJECT:
Exercise Contract Option for 12-Volt Maintenance-Free Bus Batteries
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of a resolution authorizing the President/Executive Director or his designee to execute a
contract option for 12-volt maintenance-free bus batteries with Stewart and Stevenson [Contract No.
C-1017755-01] to: 1) exercise the final one-year option; and 2) increase the not-to-exceed amount by
$165,660, for a new total authorized amount not to exceed $472,038.
COMMITTEE CONSIDERATIONS
. On March 6, 2012 the Security, Safety, Public Relations & Operations Committee moved to
forward this item to the March 20, 2012 Committee-of-the-Whole Agenda for Initial
Consideration.
. On March 20, 2012 the Committee-of-the-Whole moved to forward this item to the April 10,
2012 Committee-of-the-Whole for Final Consideration.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
. This contract option for 12-volt maintenance-free bus batteries is included in the Maintenance
Department's approved FY 2012 operating budget.
. Sufficient funding for this contract option in the amount of $165,660 is included in both the
Maintenance Department's FY 2012 Operating Expense Budget and the Operating Expense line
item of the FY 2012 Twenty-Year Financial Plan.
BUSINESS PURPOSE
. DART's fleet consists of 627 buses and each bus requires four batteries. The batteries are 12-volt,
maintenance-free, requiring no preventive maintenance or service, and are designed for the
ambient conditions in the Dallas area.
. Approval of this contract option will help achieve the Board Strategic Priority II: Manage System
Development and Maintain Infrastructure.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5
OptionforBusBatteries-COTW2 3/22/201210:10:08AM 1
. The following table identifies the history of this contract from date of award:
Date Action
Contract
Change
Amount
Total
Board
Authorized
Amount
4/14/10
Awarded Contract Below Board
Threshold
$149,700
3/22/11
Exercise 1st One-Year Option
Resolution No. 110025
$156,678 $306,378
PROCUREMENT CONSIDERATIONS
. The base term of the contract is one-year from the award date of April 13, 2010, and the contract
provides for two, one-year option.
. The pricing for the exercise of the option year is determined to be fair and reasonable.
. The contract modification analysis is provided as Attachment 1.
D/M/WBE CONSIDERATIONS
. The goals for this contract were established by DART's Board of Directors in 2004 at 25% MBE
and 5% WBE participation.
. Stewart and Stevenson, the prime contractor, has no direct MWBE participation for the contract
option period.
. The MWBE analysis and the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO-1) report information for the
company are included in Attachment 2. The prime contractor's actual EEO-1 report is available
upon request.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
. Section 452.055 of the Texas Transportation Code authorizes DART to contract for the provision
of goods and services.
OptionforBusBatteries-COTW2 3/22/201210:10:08AM 2
Attachment 1
Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority
CONTRACT OPTION ANALYSIS
Modification No. 02
Contract Information
A. Contract Description: Heavy Duty 12-Volt Maintenance-free Batteries
B. Contractor: Stewart and Stevenson
C. Contract Number: C-1017755-01
D. Contractual Action: Exercise second option year
E. Current Contract Amount: Not to exceed $306,378
F. Contract Option Amount: Not to exceed $165,660
G. New Contract Amount: Not to exceed $472,038
H. Contract Type: Indefinite Quantity/Indefinite Delivery
I. Current Term of Contract/Performance Period: April 14, 2010 April 13, 2012
J. Remaining Options Available: None
K. Price Considerations: The initial contract award was based on full and open competition,
and all bids were inclusive of option year pricing. Prices were determined to be fair and
reasonable based on a review of similar type batteries with Houston Metro. DART is paying
comparable prices for similar type batteries. DART also received two open market quotes
and pricing was on average 30% more than Stewart and Stevensons option pricing.
L. Funding: Local
M. Determination of Responsibility:
Reference Check: Satisfactory
Financial Responsibility Survey: Satisfactory
Insurance Check: Yes
Debarred/Suspended list: Not on the debarred/suspended list.
Determination and Recommendation
Stewart and Stevenson is determined to be a responsible contractor for the option described
above. Therefore, execution of the contract option is recommended.
Option for Bus Batteries-COTW2 3/22/2012 10:10:08 AM 1
Attachment 2
Exercise Contract Option for 12-Volt Maintenance-Free Bus Batteries
MWBE CONSIDERATIONS
The goals for this contract were established by DARTs Board of Directors in 2004 at 25% MBE
and 5% WBE participation.
Stewart and Stevenson, the prime contractor, has no direct MWBE participation for the contract
option period.
Summary of EEO-1 Documents:
Stewart and Stevenson, is located in Houston, Texas and employs 146 individuals. The following
is an analysis of their EEO-1 report:
ASIAN BLACK HISPANIC
NATIVE
AM.
WHITE
TOTAL Percentage
MALES
2 12 28 0 89 131 89.73%
FEMALES 0 0 3 0 12 15 10.27%
TOTAL 2 12 31 0 101 146 100%
PERCENTAGE 1.37% 8.22% 21.23% 0% 69.18% 100%
Option for Bus Batteries-COTW2 3/22/2012 10:10:08 AM 1
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
of the
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT BOARD
(Executive Committee)
Exercise Contract Option for 12-Volt Maintenance-Free Bus Batteries
WHEREAS, DART's fleet consists of 627 buses and each bus requires four batteries. The
batteries are 12-volt, maintenance-free, requiring no preventive maintenance or service, and are
designed for the ambient conditions in the Dallas area; and
WHEREAS, the proposed price for this contract option is considered to be fair and reasonable;
and
WHEREAS, funding for this contract option is within current Budget and FY 2012 Twenty-Year
Financial Plan allocations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Dallas Area Rapid Transit Board of Directors
that the President/Executive Director or his designee is authorized to execute a contract option for
12-volt maintenance-free batteries with Stewart and Stevenson [Contract No. C-1017755-01] to:
Section 1: Exercise the final one-year option.
Section 2: Increase the not-to-exceed amount by $165,660, for a new total authorized
amount not to exceed $472,038.
Prepared b Y : ~ O.dtj
Michael C. Hubbell
Vice President
Maintenance
Approved as to fonn: ~ ~
1o'Jfyattye O. Si mons
~ General Counsel
- ------
Approved by:
Option for Bus Batteries
Agenda Report
Committee-of-the-Whole
Attachment:
1. Location Maps
Voting Requirements:
Majority
DATE: April 10, 2012
SUBJECT:
SUBJECT:
Approval of Quarterly Disclosure Update as of December 31, 2011
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of a resolution authorizing the issuance of a Quarterly Disclosure Update as of December 31,
2011 to the 2012 Annual Disclosure Statement in substantially the same form as shown in Exhibit 1 to
the Resolution.
COMMITTEE CONSIDERATIONS
. On March 20, 2012 the Budget and Finance Committee moved to forward this item to the April
10, 2012 Committee-of-the-Whole for Initial Consideration.
BUSINESS PURPOSE AND FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
. On January 23, 2001, the Board approved the Master Debt Resolution (Resolution No. 010014)
and the First Supplemental Debt Resolution (Resolution No. 010015). The Master Disclosure
Statement and an Updated Disclosure Statement were approved as part of the First Supplemental
Debt Resolution.
. The Master Disclosure Statement is DART's representation to the investing community regarding
DART. This document is based on SEC best practices and exceeds normal disclosure documents.
This Statement is amended annually by DART.
. On March 6, 2012 (Resolution No. 120026), the Board approved the 2012 Annual Disclosure
Statement.
. The Quarterly Disclosure Update, dated April 24, 2012, provides updated unaudited financial
information about DART, as of December 31, 2011, and will be made available to potential
investors and on the DART website at www.DART.org.
. The discussion will help achieve the Board's Strategic Priority of Managing System Development
and Maintaining Infrastructure.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
. Section 452.054 of the Texas Transportation Code authorizes DART to exercise all powers
necessary or convenient to carry out the purposes or the provisions of the statute.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7
FY121Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/201210:06:38AM 1
. Section 452.352 of the Texas Transportation Code authorizes DART to issue bonds.
FY121Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/201210:06:38AM 2
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
of the
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT BOARD
(Executive Committee)
Approval of Quarterly Disclosure Update as of December 31, 2011
WHEREAS, on January 23, 2001, the Board approved the Master Debt Resolution (Resolution No.
010014) and the First Supplemental Debt Resolution (Resolution No. 010015). The Master
Disclosure Statement and an Updated Disclosure Statement were approved as pati of the First
Supplemental Debt Resolution; and
WHEREAS, on March 6, 2011 (Resolution No. 120026), the Board approved the 2012 Annual
Disclosure Statement; and
WHEREAS, DART desires to provide infonnation to the investing community regarding the
issuance of bonds; and
WHEREAS, DART desires to update the infonnation in the 2012 Annual Disclosure Statement and
any Supplemental Disclosure Statements on a quarterly basis.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Dallas Area Rapid Transit Board of Directors that
the President/Executive Director or his designee is authorized to issue the Quarterly Disclosure
Update dated April 24, 2012, in substantially the same form as shown in Exhibit 1 to this Resolution.
Prepared by:
Approved as to form:
avid Leininger
Chief F' nancial Officer
H
Approved by,'
FY121Q-QDU
Exhibit 1
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT
Quarterly Disclosure Update
for the three-month period ended December 31, 2011
_____________________________________
This Quarterly Disclosure Update supplements the information contained in our 2012 Annual Disclosure
Statement dated March 6, 2012 (the 2012 Annual Disclosure Statement that has been filed as a public record
with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Boards website at www.emma.msrb.org, and is posted on the Internet
at our website, www.dart.org. You may also obtain a free copy of this Quarterly Disclosure Update by contacting
us at the following address or telephone number: Vice President, Finance, DART, 1401 Pacific Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202, (214) 749-3148.
_______________________________________
GENERAL
We are posting and filing this Quarterly Disclosure Update to supplement our 2012 Annual Disclosure Statement
dated March 6, 2012. We continue to reserve the right to suspend or stop the postings on the Internet and the
quarterly updates at any time. However, we will always provide the annual and periodic information called for
under any undertaking made in compliance with Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Whenever we use capitalized words in this Quarterly Disclosure Update, they refer to the defined terms that are
found in or incorporated by reference in the 2012 Annual Disclosure Statement. See, 2012 Annual Disclosure
Statement, Appendix B, SUMMARY OF CERTAIN TERMS OF MASTER DEBT RESOLUTION.
In this Quarterly Disclosure Update, we, our, us, and DART refer to Dallas Area Rapid Transit, a
subregional transportation authority under the Act.
The information in this Quarterly Disclosure Update is as of the date stated below, except for the unaudited financial
information included herein as Exhibit A, which is for the three-month period ended December 31 2011 .
YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS IN THE 2011
ANNUAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make forward-looking statements in the 2012 Annual Disclosure Statement and in Quarterly Disclosure
Updates by using forward-looking words such as may, will, should, intends, expects, believes,
anticipates, estimates, or others. You are cautioned that forward-looking statements are subject to a variety
of uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the projected results. Those risks and uncertainties
include general economic and business conditions, conditions in the financial markets, our financial condition,
our sales tax revenues, receipt of federal grants, and various other factors that are beyond our control. Because
we cannot predict all factors that may affect future decisions, actions, events, or financial circumstances, what
actually happens may be different from what we include in forward-looking statements.
_____________________________
Dated: April 24, 2012
FY12 1Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/2012 10:06:38 AM 1
Exhibit 1
QUARTERLY DISCLOSURE UPDATE
The 2012 Annual Disclosure Statement dated March 6, 2012, is updated by the following supplemental information:
Unaudited Financial Information
Audited financial statements for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, are attached as Appendix A to the 2012
Annual Disclosure Statement. An unaudited statement of our principal accounts for the three-month period ended
December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is included as Attachment A to this Quarterly Disclosure Update. Such
quarterly financial statements should be read in conjunction with our annual financial statements. This information
is taken from our internal books and records that are created, maintained, and administered by DART in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. The use of reasonable estimates is a normal part of the preparation of
financial statements. Sales tax revenues included in the unaudited quarterly financial statements were accrued using
estimates. Actual sales tax receipts could, therefore, differ from those reported in the quarterly financial statements.
We believe that the unaudited financial information for the three-month period ended December 31, 2011, fairly
represents the financial position and operating results of DART and is complete as of, but no later than, such date.
However, you are cautioned that such financial information has not been audited or reviewed by any independent
accountants. We do not warrant or guarantee that subsequent audited information for these accounts for this three-
month period will not differ from the unaudited financial information presented herein and in Exhibit A.
Managements Comment Regarding Third Quarter Financial Information
DARTs unaudited financial statements for the three-month period ended December 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010, show sales tax revenues as $111.5 million and $102.0 million, respectively, which indicates an increase of
9.3%. Our operating results for the three-month period ended December 31, 2011 reflect an operating loss of $140.1
million, compared to an operating loss of $132.1 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2011. This
was primarily due to increased costs in depreciation and amortization and utilities mainly due to the opening and
operation of the Green Line extension to DARTs light rail system. The overall result for the three-month period
ended December 31, 2011 shows a decrease in net assets of $44.7 million since September 30, 2011.
DART maintains various cash reserves including a Financial Reserve Account that is funded with sales tax
collections that exceed budget during a given year, if any. In addition, the Board of Directors authorized the
establishment of a Capital Reserve Account. Should the Financial Reserve exceed $50 million, excess funds are
placed in the Capital Reserve Account. An affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Board is required to draw upon the
Financial and Capital Reserves, and the funds may be used for any purpose approved by the Board. For Fiscal Year
(FY) 2011, our sales tax receipts exceeded our sales tax budget by $8.5 million. Our Financial Standards require us
to move any overages to the Financial Reserve Account. These funds were moved in December 2011 and the
balance in the Financial Reserve Account as of December 31, 2011 was $31.6 million and the balance in the Capital
Reserve Account was $0. As of December 31, 2011, the Operating Fund balance was $717.9 million. We maintain
a working cash balance in the Operating Fund equal to at least one month of projected payments.
Financial Outlook
The Dallas/Fort Worth economy grew at a modest pace. DART has developed an FY 2012 Twenty-Year Financial
Plan that reflects a return to calmer waters after the stormy economic seas that we have weathered in the past several
years. During FY 2011, revenues remained at or above the revised forecasts, and our current Budget and Financial
Plan represent a program of staying on track. DARTs FY 2012 Twenty-Year Financial Plan shows limited
changes from the 2011 Plan. All light rail build-out projects remain on the same schedules, and all projected future
service levels remaing intact. This is comforting after several years of financial uncertainty.
F Y 1 2 1 Q - Q D U - C O T W 1 3 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 2 1 0 : 0 6 : 3 8 A M 2
Exhibit 1
Lease/Leaseback Transactions Update
We have successfully terminated or repaired all lease/leaseback transactions that were non-compliant with their
respective operative documents. As of September 30, 2011, four lease/leaseback transactions remain active and all
are in full compliance with the respective operative documents, as amended.
Litigation
No significant changes have occurred in the status of pending litigation involving DART since the date of the 2012
Annual Disclosure Statement. Accruals and estimated losses on claims that are asserted in pending litigation, if any,
are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the unaudited statement of our principal accounts attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
Other than cases filed in the ordinary course of business as an operating transit agency, no new litigation has been
filed against DART since the date of the 2012 Annual Disclosure Statement. See, 2012 Annual Disclosure
Statement, LITIGATION.
______________________________
FY12 1Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/2012 10:06:38 AM 3
Exhibit 1
Exhibit A
Unaudited Statement of Principal Accounts
for the three-month period ended December 31, 2011
FY12 1Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/2012 10:06:38 AM 4
1
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT
STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS
December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 (Dollars in Thousands)
12/31/2011
Unaudited
9/30/2011
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ 78,787 $ 116,477
Investments 674,379 677,801
Derivative instrument asset 4,426 5,480
Sales and use tax receivable 78,000 68,114
Transit revenue receivable, net 2,310 2,563
Due from federal and other governments 12,452 20,306
Materials and supplies inventory, net 28,370 27,381
Prepaid transit expense and other 5,111 2,483
Restricted investments held by trustee for debt service 25,312 65,375
Restricted investments held for advance funding agreements 10,911 11,921
Restricted investments held to pay capital lease/leaseback liabilities 55,762 55,762
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 975,820 1,053,663
NONCURRENT ASSETS
Investments restricted for system expansion and acquisition 285,577 354,274
Restricted Investments held as security for capital lease/leaseback liabilities 10,766 10,766
Investment in joint venture 23,575 24,190
Capital assets
Land and rights-of-way 548,904 548,904
Depreciable capital assets, net of depreciation 3,321,840 3,367,054
Projects in progress 910,441 859,872
Restricted investments held to pay capital lease/leaseback liabilities 274,141 268,141
Net pension asset 6,485 6,485
Unamortized bond issue costs and other 22,375 22,677
TOTAL NONCURRENT ASSETS 5,404,104 5,462,363
TOTAL ASSETS 6,379,924 6,516,026
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 71,209 93,415
Commercial paper notes payable 150,000 150,000
Current portion of capital lease/leaseback liabilities 55,762 55,762
Current portion of repayment due to State Comptroller 824 824
Local Assistance Program payable 6,170 13,370
Retainage payable 37,773 55,666
Unearned revenue and other liabilities 38,896 35,194
Accrued interest payable from restricted assets 14,493 58,037
Current portion of senior lien sales tax revenue bonds payable 6,740 8,370
Deferred inflows of resources 4,426 5,480
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 386,293 476,118
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities 30,758 30,217
Repayment due to State Comptroller 11,664 11,871
Senior lien sales tax revenue bonds payable 3,348,125 3,356,068
Capital lease/leaseback liabilities 274,141 268,141
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 3,664,688 3,666,297
TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,050,981 4,142,415
NET ASSETS
Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 1,498,390
1,515,210
Restricted for debt service 10,819 7,338
Restricted as security for capital lease/leaseback liabilities 10,766 10,766
Unrestricted 808,968 840,297
TOTAL NET ASSETS $2,328,943 $2,373,611
FY12 1Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/2012 10:06:38 AM 5
2
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
For the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (Dollars in Thousands)
2011
Unaudited
2010
Unaudited
OPERATING REVENUES
Passenger revenues $ 15,362 $ 13,998
Advertising, rent, and other 2,942 2,866
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 18,304 16,864
OPERATING EXPENSES
Labor 49,759 50,537
Benefits 22,582 22,853
Services 6,122 6,483
Materials and supplies 12,112 12,486
Purchased transportation 13,804 13,101
Depreciation and amortization 47,637 37,874
Utilities 4,318 3,619
Taxes, leases, and other 1,121 1,103
Casualty and liability 991 949
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 158,446 149,005
NET OPERATING LOSS (140,142) (132,141)
NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)
Sales and use tax revenue 111,485 102,040
Investment income 2,086
Interest income from investments held to pay capital lease/leaseback 6,000 5,976
Interest expense on capital lease/leaseback (6,000) (5,976)
Street improvements (950) (61)
Interest and financing expenses (33,937) (22,966)
Build America Bonds tax credit 7,616 7,404
Other non-operating revenues 2,607 2,208
Other non-operating expenses (495) (1,179)
NET NON-OPERATING REVENUES 88,412 87,446
LOSS BEFORE CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND GRANTS (51,730) (44,695)
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND GRANTS
Federal capital contributions 5,613 5,029
State capital contributions 291
Local capital contributions 740 237
Total capital contributions 6,353 5,557
Other federal grants 709 669
TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND GRANTS 7,062 6,226
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS (44,668) (38,469)
TOTAL NET ASSETS BEGINNING OF YEAR 2,373,611 2,445,494
TOTAL NET ASSETS END OF THE QUARTER $2,328,943 $2,407,025
FY12 1Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/2012 10:06:38 AM 6
3
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (Dollars in Thousands)
2011
Unaudited
2010
Unaudited
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Receipts from customers $ 26,645 $ 21,659
Payments to suppliers of goods and services (33,747) (37,054)
Payments to purchased transportation service providers (13,813) (12,531)
Payments to employees (49,869) (51,663)
Benefit payments on behalf of employees (19,164) (19,481)
NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES (89,948) (99,070)
CASH FLOWS FROM NON-CAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Sales and use tax proceeds 101,393 93,029
Other federal grants 462 819
Build America Bonds tax credit 15,231 7,403
Other non-capital financing receipts 481 8,312
Other non-capital financing payments (54) (1,119)
Local Assistance Program and street improvements (8,057) (369)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY NON-CAPITAL FINANCING
ACTIVITIES 109,456 108,075
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Interest on investments 1,107 2,342
Proceeds from sales and maturity of investments 208,690 199,499
Purchase of investments (204,378) (238,356)
(Increase) decrease in restricted assets 109,769 (493,372)
NET CASH (USED) GENERATED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES 115,188 (529,887)
CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
Acquisition and construction of capital assets (88,695) (175,910)
Proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper notes 225,000 150,000
Payment on commercial paper notes (225,000) (150,000)
Proceeds from the issuance revenue bonds 839,531
Payments for advance refunding revenue bonds (110,410)
Principal payment on revenue bonds (8,370) (18,790)
Interest and financing expenses (81,137) (54,718)
Payments of bond issuance costs (4,949)
Federal capital contributions 5,613 6,471
Local capital contribution 203
Proceeds from the sale of capital assets 830
NET CASH USED BY CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
(172,386)
482,055
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (37,690) (38,827)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR 116,477 141,419
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR $ 78,787 $ 102,592
FY12 1Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/2012 10:06:38 AM 7
4
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (Dollars in Thousands)
2011
Unaudited
2010
Unaudited
RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING LOSS TO CASH USED
BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net operating loss $(140,142) $(132,140)
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET OPERATING LOSS TO
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Depreciation 47,637 37,874
Changes in assets and liabilities
(Increase) decrease in transit receivable 3,308 137
Increase (decrease) in materials and supplies inventory (989) (820)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets (2,441)
Increase(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities (2,889) (4,641)
Increase in other current liabilities 3,127 2,961
NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $(89,948) $(99,070)
NON-CASH OPERATING, INVESTING, AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Interest income from investments held to pay capital lease/leaseback $6,000 $5,976
Interest expense on capital lease/leaseback (6,000) (5,976)
Increase in capital lease/leaseback obligations 6,000 5,976
Decrease in investments held to pay capital lease/leaseback 6,000 5,976
Decrease in fair value of investments 770 (2,079)
Amortization of premium, discount and debt issuance costs (3,441) (771)
FY12 1Q-QDU-COTW1 3/22/2012 10:06:38 AM 8
Agenda Report
Committee-of-the-Whole
Attachments:
1. March 20 Presentation
2. Fare Structure Review Schedule
3. 10/1/10 Fare Structure with
Proposed Changes
4. Recommended Fare Structure
as of 12/1/12
DATE: April 10, 2012
SUBJECT:
Proposed Fare Structure Change
RECOMMENDATION
This is a briefing item. No action is required at this time.
BUSINESS PURPOSE
. The purpose of this item will be to discuss the proposed fare structure change.
. The Twenty-Year Financial Plan assumes a 17% increase to the average fare every five years. A
Fare Model has been developed to analyze the impact of fare changes on revenue and ridership.
Extensive testing of various scenarios has been conducted, including pricing by mode of
transportation, time of day, etc. The goal is to achieve a fare structure that meets revenue
requirements while minimizing impact to our customers.
. The proposed changes to the Fare Structure were discussed with the Budget and Finance
Committee on March 20, 2012. The Committee requested that the item be added to the April 10
Committee-of-the-Whole agenda to allow more members of the Board to participate in the
discussion. A copy of the March 20 presentation is included as Attachment 1.
. A schedule for Board review and approval of a fare increase to be effective with the opening of
the Orange Line and the Blue Line extension in December 2012 is included as Attachment 2.
DART's current Fare Structure with the proposed changes shown in edit mode is included as
Attachment 3.
. Attachment 4 is a clean copy of the recommended Fare Structure to be effective december 1,
2012.
. The discussion will help achieve the Board's Strategic Priorities of Managing System
Development and Maintaining Infrastructure and Maximizing Funding Resources.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8
FareStructureChangeCOTW041012-COTW1 4/6/201210:49:53AM 1
2013 Proposed Fare Adjustments 2013 Proposed Fare Adjustments
and Approval Process
Budget and Finance Committee
March 20, 2012 March 20, 2012
Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
FY13 Fare Structure Adjustments
The FY12 Financial Plan includes a programmed fare
increase in FY13 requiring an increase of 15.4% in
fixed-route total passenger fare revenue.
The fare change would be implemented concurrently
with the opening of the Orange Line (I-2) and the Blue
Line to Rowlett in December 2012. This also coincides
with the expanded deployment of the new SMART Bus with the expanded deployment of the new SMART Bus
service.
Th d f h i l d t li i th The proposed fare changes include streamlining the
fare products, a new 2-hour fare product, lower off-
peak pricing, and potential Lone Star Card pricing. p p g, p p g
2 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
2
Fares in DARTs Financial Plan
Year
Ave. FR
Fare
FR Fare
Revenues
(000s)
Total Fare
Revenues
(000s)
2012 $0.8277 $54,353 $57,741
2013 0.9689 62,672 66,589 Programmed Fare Increase
2014 0.9692 63,567 67,611
2015 0.9698 65,365 69,544
2016 0.9737 65,945 70,260
2017 0.9738 67,372 71,794
2018 1 1395 77 286 82 403 P d F I 2018 1.1395 77,286 82,403 Programmed Fare Increase
2019 1.1396 78,123 83,366
2020 1.1401 80,329 85,700
2021 1 1401 81 937 87 440 2021 1.1401 81.937 87,440
2022 1.1401 83,578 89,216
2023 1.3340 95,765 102,317 Programmed Fare Increase
3 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
3
Fare Structure Review Schedule
Date Description Audience
2/21/2012 Proposed Fare Increase & Approval Process Budget & Finance Committee
3/20/2012 Proposed Fare Structure Alternatives Budget & Finance Committee
4/24/2012 Approval to Call Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Budget & Finance Committee
5/8/2012 Approval to Call Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Committee-of-the-Whole 5/8/2012 Approval to Call Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Committee of the Whole
5/22/2012 Approval to Call Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Committee-of-the-Whole/Board
6/26/2012 Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Board
7/10/2012 Approval of Fare Structure Budget & Finance Committee
8/14/2012 Approval of Fare Structure Committee-of-the-Whole
8/28/2012 Approval of Fare Structure Committee-of-the-Whole/Board
12/1/2012 Fare Structure Change Effective
4 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
4
Transit Agency Fare Structure
Comparison Comparison
Transit Agency
Base
Fare
Day
Pass
Premium
Base Fare
Premium
Day Pass Weekly Pass Monthly Pass
$ $ $ $ Atlanta $2.50 $9.00 N/A N/A $23.75 $95.00
Sacramento $2.50 $6.00 N/A N/A N/A $100.00
San Diego $2.50 $5.00 $5.00 $12.00 N/A $72/$100
Denver* $2.25 $6.75 $4/$5 $11.50/$14 N/A $79/$176
Ut h $2 25 $5 50 $5 00 N/A N/A $75/$180 Utah $2.25 $5.50 $5.00 N/A N/A $75/$180
Portland $2.10 $5.00 $2.40 $5.00 $21 to $24 $81 to $92
St. Louis** $2.00 $7.50 $2.25/$2.75 $7.50 $23.50 $68.00
Miami-Dade $2.00 $5.00 $2.35 $5.00 $26.00 $100.00
Dallas $1 75 $4 00 $3 50/$5 $7/$10 $20 to $50 $65 to $120 Dallas $1.75 $4.00 $3.50/$5 $7/$10 $20 to $50 $65 to $120
Houston-Smart
Card*** $1.25 $5.00 $2 to $4.50 $4 to $9 $25 to $45 $93.75 to $180
* Denver has Local, Express & Regional *** Houston Metro has 5 zones - $1.25, $2, $3.25, $3.75, & $4.50
Day Pass calculated at 4 trips weekly pass at 20 trips & monthly 75 paid trips Day Pass calculated at 4 trips, weekly pass at 20 trips & monthly 75 paid trips.
** Light rail is a premium Premium day pass calculated at 2 trips, weekly pass at 10, & monthly at 40
5 free trips for every 50 trips purchased.
5 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
5
Fare History
FY03 Computed Day Pass from $2 to
$2 50 $2.50
FY 09 Day Pass from $2.50 to $3
FY 10 Day Pass from $3 to $4
See Appendix 1 for detail and average fare by year.
6 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
6
Farebox Recovery History
Y
Total FR
P
Total FR
Passenger
R
FR Farebox
R C t Year Passengers Revenue Recovery Comment
FY01 60,381 29,234 12.3%
FY02 58,588 31,065 11.4%
FY03 59,635 33,634 12.5% Fare Increase: Base fare from $1.00 to $1.25
FY04 57,071 33,567 13.1%
FY05 59,724 34,552 12.5%
FY06 65,684 37,655 13.5%
FY07 65,058 38,024 13.4%
FY08 67,396 47,954 15.4% Fare Increase: Base fare from $1.25 to $1.50
FY09 64,858 41,387 13.1%
FY10 58,259 52,082 15.1% Fare Increase: Base fare from $1.50 to $1.75
FY11A 61,941 53,899 15.4%
FY12B 65,896 54,353 14.2%
FY13P 65,079 62,677 15.9% Projected Fare Increase
7 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
7
Ridership History (in thousands)
Mode FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12B FY13P
Bus 45,211 43,104 37,991 37,213 39,925 39,146
LRT 19,438 18,965 17,799 22,302 23,548 23,560
CR 2,747 2,789 2,469 2,425 2,422 2,373
Fixed Route 67,396 64,858 58,259 61,941 65,896 65,079
Paratransit 737 751 773 790 816 862
HOV 48,095 51,033 50,108 48,046 32,440 32,765
150,000
HOV 48,095 51,033 50,108 48,046 32,440 32,765
Vanpool 697 881 925 985 1,035 1,035
Total Ridership 116,925 117,523 110,065 111,762 100,187 99,741
75,000
100,000
125,000
0
25,000
50,000
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12B FY13P
Fixed Route Total Ridership
8 Finance Department
Fixed Route Total Ridership
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
8
12-Month Rolling Fixed-Route
Ridership (in thousands)
250
200
250
FR+6.8%
100
150
Bus2.1%
0
50
LRT+27.3%
CR2.1%
Bus LRT CR FixedRouteTotal
9 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
9
Farebox Revenue Analysis
10 10 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
0
2010 2012 Fare Sales by Type
Year l y Uni t s Rev enue
Est i mat ed
Uni t s
Est i mat ed
Rev enue
Est i mat ed
Uni t s
Est i mat ed
Rev enue
Si ngl e Far e
1,834,224 3,708,313 $ 2,379,698 4,164,471 $ 2,276,138 4,012,402 $
36,816 92,040 46,263 161,920 45,655 160,378
21,732 81,495 32,970 164,850 29,949 150,128
583 236 495 353 671 148 570 476 692 963 597 897 Reduced
Ty pe of Far e
Local
Syst em
Regional
FY 2 0 1 0
ACTUAL
FY 2 0 1 1
ACTUAL
FY 2 0 1 2
BUDGET
583,236 495,353 671,148 570,476 692,963 597,897
50,532 1,561,069 49,750 1,474,704 48,284 1,449,143
2 ,5 2 6 ,5 4 0 5 ,9 3 8 ,2 7 0 $ 3 ,1 7 9 ,8 2 8 6 ,5 3 6 ,4 2 0 $ 3 ,0 9 2 ,9 8 9 6 ,3 6 9 ,9 4 7 $
Day Passes
3,870,372 15,481,488 $ 4,648,125 18,592,500 $ 4,567,214 18,327,371 $
400,788 2,003,940 141,572 991,004 143,504 1,006,369
40,272 302,040 36,941 369,410 35,369 354,141
1,497,984 2,995,968 1,635,199 3,270,398 1,609,462 3,239,544
61,536 1,538,400 68,652 1,786,120 66,841 1,671,883
Parat ransit Coupon
Tot al Si ngl e Far e
Local
Reduced
Syst em
Regional
Vouchers
Reduced
5 ,8 7 0 ,9 5 2 2 2 ,3 2 1 ,8 3 6 $ 6 ,5 3 0 ,4 8 9 2 5 ,0 0 9 ,4 3 2 $ 6 ,4 2 2 ,3 9 1 2 4 ,5 9 9 ,3 0 8 $
Mon t h l y Passes
126,072 8,194,680 $ 124,641 8,101,665 $ 129,693 8,431,722 $
21,168 1,587,600 16,703 1,670,300 16,593 1,659,511
7,560 793,800 6,761 811,320 6,137 736,573
63,324 2,026,368 65,262 2,088,382 71,913 2,302,136
2 1 8 ,1 2 4 1 2 ,6 0 2 ,4 4 8 $ 2 1 3 ,3 6 7 1 2 ,6 7 1 ,6 6 7 $ 2 2 4 ,3 3 7 1 3 ,1 2 9 ,9 4 2 $
7 - Day Passes
34 416 688 320 $ 74 963 1 499 260 $ 68 224 1 365 350 $
Tot al Day Passes
Local
Syst em
Regional
Reduced
Tot al Mont hl y Passes
L l 34,416 688,320 $ 74,963 1,499,260 $ 68,224 1,365,350 $
2,892 72,300 2,752 96,320 2,503 87,637
672 25,200 399 19,950 362 18,112
3 7 ,9 8 0 7 8 5 ,8 2 0 $ 7 8 ,1 1 4 1 ,6 1 5 ,5 3 0 $ 7 1 ,0 8 9 1 ,4 7 1 ,0 9 9 $
An n u al Passes
251 148,593 $ 226 146,900 $ 211 136,935 $
59 38,422 35 35,000 30 30,385
14 10,658 7 8,400 7 8,508
- 0 39 14,976 34 13,224
Local
Local
Syst em
Regional
Tot al 7 - Day Passes
Syst em
Regional
Senior , ,
15,972 7,260,849 16,876 8,110,128 8,913 3,564,644
3,930 2,149,432
3,678 2,452,890
1 6 ,2 9 6 7 ,4 5 8 ,5 2 2 $ 1 7 ,1 8 3 8 ,3 1 5 ,4 0 4 $ 1 6 ,8 0 3 8 ,3 5 6 ,0 1 8 $
Ot h er Pr ogr am s
34,717 818,921 $ 42,672 1,019,545 $ 33,437 1,176,670 $
30,771 123,082 572 325,491 308 301,547
6 5 ,4 8 8 9 4 2 ,0 0 3 $ 4 3 ,2 4 4 1 ,3 4 5 ,0 3 6 $ 3 3 ,7 4 5 1 ,4 7 8 ,2 1 8 $
Corporat e Programs - Local
Corporat e Programs - Syst em
Corporat e Programs - Regional
Tot al Annual Passes
Secondary/ College Decals
Special Event s
Tot al Ot her Pr ogr ams
8 ,7 3 5 ,3 8 0 5 0 ,0 4 8 ,8 9 9 $ 1 0 ,0 6 2 ,2 2 5 5 5 ,4 9 3 ,4 8 9 $ 9 ,8 6 1 ,3 5 3 5 5 ,4 0 4 ,5 3 2 $
11 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
1
Fare Sales by Mode
Quantity Revenue Quantity Revenue Quantity Revenue
2
SingleRide 1,139,138 2,005,001 $ 1,804,260 2,720,675 $ 114,622 214,894 $
DayPass 1,870,733 7,300,361 $ 4,301,427 14,977,893 $ 257,510 829,450 $
7DayPass 41,453 845,096 $ 35,866 737,038 $ 1,000 37,632 $
PassType
FY11SalesbyMode
LRT BUS TRE
Monthly 95,341 6,074,045 $ 96,979 5,342,752 $ 24,988 1,488,944 $
Annual(Corporate) 10,916 5,344,367 $ 2,036 1,036,972 $ 3,359 1,743,826 $
Annual(Retail) 218 138,541 $ 31 21,512 $ 18 17,380 $
SecondarySchools/Colleges 18,314 437,560 $ 4,237 101,231 $ 20,121 480,919 $
Vouchers(bookoften) 21,140 524,260 $ 28,640 687,387 $ 23,226 576,003 $
Totals 3,197,252 22,669,230 $ 6,273,477 25,625,460 $ 444,846 5,389,048 $
Quantity Revenue Quantity Revenue Quantity Revenue
2
SingleRide 585,831 1,027,062 $ 1,787,088 2,691,100 $ 88,365 135,694 $
DayPass 972,483 3,762,085 $ 4,481,191 15,885,615 $ 350,114 1,110,668 $
7Day Pass 4,678 98,441 $ 32,004 650,339 $ 1,298 37,040 $
FY10SalesbyMode
PassType
LRT BUS TRE
7 DayPass 4,678 98,441 $ 32,004 650,339 $ 1,298 37,040 $
Monthly 77,709 4,939,902 $ 111,430 6,030,521 $ 28,985 1,632,025 $
Annual(Corporate) 739 3,633,523 $ 653 1,247,769 $ 378 2,684,999 $
Annual(Retail) 22 14,707 $ 5 3,186 $ 5 4,177 $
SecondarySchools/Colleges 9,014 201,023 $ 5,270 117,516 $ 20,433 455,652 $
Vouchers(bookoften) 4,068 101,724 $ 48,240 1,206,108 $ 9,228 230,580 $
Totals 1,654,545 13,778,466 $ 6,465,880 27,832,155 $ 498,807 6,290,835 $
1
Includes Oncall UTDand SMU shuttle services only IncludesOncall,UTDandSMUshuttleservicesonly
2
IncludesDallasCountyrevenuesonly
12 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
2
TRE Impact of Oct. 2010 Fare Increase
Commuter Rail Revenue Analysis
FY10 FY11 FY11 vs FY11 vs
Agency Revenue Revenue FY10 ($) FY10 (%) g y ( ) ( )
DART $6,426,337 $5,817,712 ($608,625) -9.5%
The T $1,534,340 $2,255,004 $720,664 47.0%
Total Revenue $7,960,677 $8,072,716 $112,039 1.4%
* DART revenue shown above includes earnings from only System and Regional passes
Commuter Rail Ridership Analysis p y
FY10 FY11 FY11 vs FY11 vs
Agency Ridership Ridership FY10 (#) FY10 (%)
Th T 2 469 175 2 425 274 (43 901) 1 8% The T 2,469,175 2,425,274 (43,901) -1.8%
* TRE boundary line moved from West Irving to CentrePort during 12/10
* Fare increases to System and Regional passes
13 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
3
FY13 F I FY13 Fare Increase
Recommendations
14 14 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
4
Fare Analysis Project
The Financial Plan assumes the average fare will increase
17%every five years 17% every five years
A Fare Model was developed to analyze the impact of fare
changes on revenue and ridership
Extensive testing of various scenarios has been conducted
New fare structures have been explored, including pricing
by mode of transit time of day and service levels by mode of transit, time of day, and service levels.
The goal is to find the fare structure/levels that meet
revenue requirements while minimizing ridership impact q g p p
15 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
5
Normalizing Pricing of Fare Types
Base
Fare Day Pass Weekly Monthly Annual
Base
Fare Day Pass Weekly Monthly Annual
Current Fares Proposed Fares
Local $ 1.75 2.29 x Base 5 x Day 16.25 x Day 162.5 x Day
System $ 3.50 2 x Base 5 x Day 14.3 x Day 143 x Day $ 2.50 2 x Base 5 x Day 16 x Day 160 x Day
Regional $ 5.00 2 x Base 5 x Day 12 x Day 120 x Day $ 5.00 2 x Base 5 x Day 16 x Day 160 x Day
16 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
6
Fare Structure Comparison
Current Fares Current Fares
Individual Fares Corporate Fares
Base Fare
Day
Pass
Weekl
y
Monthl
y Annual
Normal
SL High SL (Single Ride)
Local $1.75 $5.00 $25.00 $65.00 $650.00 $312.00 $468.00
System 3 50 7 00 35 00 100 00 1 000 00 480 00 720 00 System 3.50 7.00 35.00 100.00 1,000.00 480.00 720.00
Regional 5.00 10.00 50.00 120.00 1,200.00 576.00 864.00
Across the Board 27% : Net 15.9% Inc. Revenue and 5.1% Ridership Decrease
Individual
Fares Corporate Fares Fares Corporate Fares
Base Fare
Day
Pass
Weekl
y
Monthl
y Annual Annual (Single Ride)
Local $2.20 $5.10 $25.50 $82.50 $825.00 $619.00
System 4.45 8.90 44.50 127.00 1,270 953.00
Regional 6 35 12 70 63 50 152 00 1 524 1143 00 Regional 6.35 12.70 63.50 152.00 1,524 1143.00
Recommended Option
Simplified Fare with off-peak discounted fares: Net 15.8% Revenue Inc. & 2.8%
Ridership Dec.
Individual
Fares Corporate Fares
Base Fare
(2 Hr. Pass)
Day
Pass
Weekl
y
Monthl
y Annual
Mid-day
Pass Annual
System $2.50 $5.00 $25.00 $80.00 $800.00 $ 1.75 $600.00
Regional 5 00 10 00 50 00 160 00 1600 00 $ 3 50 1 200 00
17 Finance Department
Regional 5.00 10.00 50.00 160.00 1600.00 $ 3.50 1,200.00
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
7
Corporate Pass Program
CY 2011 Corporate Pass Program Statistics % Trip Revised
Type of Fare Fare Quantity Revenue Loss Quantity
Local Normal $ 312 6,226 $ 1,914,029 25% 4,670
Local High $ 468 2,511 $ 1,126,276 13% 2,197
Weighted Avg $ 348 8,737 $ 3,040,305 6,867
Commuter Rail & Express
System Normal $ 480 1,942 $ 887,219 25% 1,457
System High $ 720 1,631 $ 1,154,621 13% 1,427
Weighted Avg $ 571 3,573 $ 2,041,840 2,884
Region Normal $ 576 1,445 $ 771,113 25% 1,084
Region High $ 864 1,940 $ 1,641,183 13% 1,698
Weighted Avg $ 713 3 385 $ 2 412 296 2 781 Weighted Avg $ 713 3,385 $ 2,412,296 2,781
Weighted Avg $ 478 15,695 $ 7,494,441 12,532
18 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
8
Benefits
Reduction in fare media types simplification for
customers operators customer service and enforcement customers, operators, customer service, and enforcement.
Two-hour fare allows customers who need to go and
return within two hours to reduce their cost parents,
quick retail trips, hair appointments, etc.
Peak period/Off-peak Reduces cost to seniors and others
who can travel off peak; reduces service needed for peak who can travel off peak; reduces service needed for peak
periods which lowers costs; improves use of service
available during off-peak; and complies with Federal rules
R d d P on Reduced Passes.
19 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
1
9
Fare Structure Review Schedule
Date Description Audience
2/21/2012 Proposed Fare Increase & Approval Process Budget & Finance Committee
3/20/2012 Proposed Fare Structure Alternatives Budget & Finance Committee
4/24/2012 Approval to Call Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Budget & Finance Committee
5/8/2012 Approval to Call Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Committee-of-the-Whole 5/8/2012 Approval to Call Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Committee of the Whole
5/22/2012 Approval to Call Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Committee-of-the-Whole/Board
6/26/2012 Public Hearing for Fare Structure Change Board
7/10/2012 Approval of Fare Structure Budget & Finance Committee
8/14/2012 Approval of Fare Structure Committee-of-the-Whole
8/28/2012 Approval of Fare Structure Committee-of-the-Whole/Board
12/1/2012 Fare Structure Change Effective
20 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
2
0
Appendix 1 - Fare History
Year
Local
Day Pass
Local
Monthly Pass
Premium /
System
Day Pass
Premium /
System
Monthly Pass
Premium /
Regional
Day Pass
Regional
Monthly Pass
Corporate
High/Platinum
Local**
FR
Average Fare
FY01* $2 00 $30 00 $4 00 $60 00 n/a n/a $160 00 FY01 $2.00 $30.00 $4.00 $60.00 n/a n/a $160.00
FY02* $2.00 $30.00 $4.00 $60.00 n/a n/a $160.00
FY03* $2.50 $40.00 $4.50 $70.00 n/a n/a $160.00
FY04 $2.50 $40.00 $4.50 $70.00 n/a n/a $190.00 $0.59
FY05 $2.50 $40.00 $4.50 $70.00 n/a n/a $190.00 $0.58
FY06 $2.50 $40.00 $4.50 $70.00 n/a n/a $190.00 $0.59
FY07 $2.50 $40.00 $4.50 $70.00 n/a n/a $190.00 $0.60
FY08 $3.00 $50.00 $5.00 $80.00 n/a n/a $190.00 $0.70
FY09 $3.00 $50.00 $5.00 $80.00 n/a n/a $190.00 $0.69
FY10 $4 00 $65 00 $5 00 $75 00 $7 50 $100 00 $468 00 $0 86 FY10 $4.00 $65.00 $5.00 $75.00 $7.50 $100.00 $468.00 $0.86
FY11A $4.00 $65.00 $7.00 $100.00 $10.00 $120.00 $498.00 $0.87
FY12B $4.00 $65.00 $7.00 $100.00 $10.00 $120.00 $494.00 $0.84
FY12 Thru Jan $0.88
* Prior to FY04, there were no Day Passes so the price reflected in the table above is the price of two single fares.
** Prior to FY10, Corporate purchasers were required to buy a pass for every employee. After that, only the employees who used the service.
21 Finance Department
F
a
r
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
O
T
W
0
4
1
0
1
2
-
C
O
T
W
1
4
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
3
A
M
2
1
Fare Structure Review Schedule
04/10/12
Attachment 2
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 26 27 28 29 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30
MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 31
SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 30 31
SUBJECT:
Briefing on Public Security Declaratory Judgment Litigation
RECOMMENDATION
This is a briefing item. No action is required at this time.
BUSINESS PURPOSE
. The Committee will be given a briefing on the possible initiation of declaratory judgment
litigation to determine matters related to DART's issuance of public securities.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9
BriefingonPublicSecurityDeclaratoryJudgmentLitigation-COTW1 4/5/201211:04:08AM 1