hajimohamedk

If anyone oppose zakir naik come for open talk if the have real things in their hands.

Peace Seeker

Voice Truth, You are right ignorance is the root of all evils! Mahela, You should read read & read please do read and learn then comment on something....Did anyone said that Muslims are immortal???Then why are you saying that Muslims die beacause of Alzheimers diseases and stuffs like that...Man grow up! Never judge a religion through its followers because not necessarily all of them are in the right path.Please read the Scriptures.Read The Quran then comment...The Quran never teaches to kill humans or rape women..The Quran gives a right vision and right understanding to live a better life being a human.I mean HUMANE qualities. And about Buddha..I am not telling anything about cause I don't know anything him in details.So I better not say anything agaist him.But as far as I know he was a peace loving person and never meant any harm to anyone.So respect for him.But as for Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) he took swords because his circumstances made him do so and I bet even Buddha would have done the same thing if he were in His place or even worser action than that!! Mecca was full of commotion and literally a hell at that point of time I mean during the 5th century. I guess Buddha didn't come across this kind of situation during his time. A Suggestion to all- Please READ. Iqra Bismi Rabbi Qalazi Khalaq-Read in the name of Allah.

nischayatmik

I agree to ALL THOSE WHO SAY THAT ZAKIR NAIK IS A NOT AN INTELETUAL BUT A DAAWAH WHO IS JUST TRYING TO PREACH ISLAM. I have a through understanding of sanskrit and have completed my bachelors. Zakir Naik has a professional degree in medicine and not in theology. It is funny to note that our country is full of pseudo intellectuals who pretend to understand the Vedic Scriptures and therefore misinterpret them. I would recommend the book written by robert spencer. check it out for it will give you a clear insight into understanding islam. http://www.schnellmann.org/Robert_Spe...

Mahela N.

As for raping I would like copy and paste the following from Yahoo Answers: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/ind... Question: ‘It has become widespread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children. (mufa’khathat - literally translated, it means “placing between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars, knowing full well that the prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha - the mother of believers - may Allah be pleased with her ? Answer: After studying the issue, the committee has answered as follows: AS FOR THE PROPHET, HIS THIGHING HIS FIANCE AISHA WHEN SHE WAS SIX YEARS of age and not able to consummate the relationship was due to her small age. That is why the Prophet used to place his male member between her thighs and massage it, as the prophet had control of his male member not like other men. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question forwarded by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/5/1453 and 7/5/1421 (Islamic calendar) ___________________________ Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements: "A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven." Khomeini, "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990 “It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his ***** between her thighs, and to kiss her.” Ayatu Allah Al Khumaini's "Tahrir Al wasila" p. 241 _________

Mahela N.

As for raping I would like to copy and paste from the Yahoo answers http://answers.yahoo.com/question/ind... Question: ‘It has become widespread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children. (mufa’khathat - literally translated, it means “placing between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars, knowing full well that the prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha - the mother of believers - may Allah be pleased with her ? Answer: After studying the issue, the committee has answered as follows: As for the prophet, his thighing his fiancée Aisha when she was six years of age and not able to consummate the relationship was due to her small age. That is why the Prophet used to place his male member between her thighs and massage it, as the prophet had control of his male member not like other men. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question forwarded by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/5/1453 and 7/5/1421 (Islamic calendar) ____________________________ Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements: "A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven." Khomeini, "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990 “It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his ***** between her thighs, and to kiss her.” Ayatu Allah Al Khumaini's "Tahrir Al wasila" p. 241 _____________________________

A5adnan

I agree with pkesara, Lets have a live debate..

pkesara

why dont zakir naik have a online debate with ali sina and prove islam is a peaceful religion.He kept escaping from ali sina that he doesnt have time .Joke of the century

Mahela N.

is reading To Voice_ Truth bellow How does Nietzsche's dying and his comment about God relate in justifying your point?. There are so mnay muslims who have become mad. Their praying 5 times were of no help to them when becoming mad or dying from similar or worse causes. Do they suggest what they could have uttered when they were sane wrong ? Where is logic in such an argument? . Even you may die from Alzhemir's decease or any other when you become old. May be I too. As I hear prophet Mohommed had epileptic fits. If you want me to remove Nietzche's comment then let me take The Buddha's statement. "One's Creator and the Destoryer is oneself" -The Dhammapada Dr. Zakir is a "Great Intellectual" to his followers. Not to me and many others I know. I donot believe memorization of passages makes one an intellectual. What he lacks is CRITICAL THINKING. One who uses critical thinking has to use such critical thinking to the foundation of his thinking too. That is how the world was developed. To make use of the scriptures of others to prove one's attachments to religuous thoughts shows more of fanatical attachment than critical thinking or logical reasoning. Prophet Mohommed can never ever be a Maithri Buddha because according to the concept of the Buddha,1. A Buddha never carries a sword. Even to meet the terrorist Angulimala The Buddha went without weapons and without a crowd saying they were for "self defense" . And He made Angulimala back to his senses. Prophet Mohommed carried a sword into make wars 2. A Budha never marries because sex not the life form of a Higher Form of Being. It is for those who have carnal desires. Prophet Mohommed married about 9 wives and one was a 9 year old girl. STUDY THE FOLLOWING CRITICALLY AND SEE HOW DR ZAKIRS THINING POWER IS. http://www.scribd.com/doc/14094820/A-....

voice_truth

Mr Mahela What was the fate of Friedrich Nietzsche.. In 1889, Nietzsche collapsed in Turin and suffered a devastating mental breakdown, one from which he would never recover. Deranged, he spent time in an asylum in Basel, then was looked after by his mother until her death in 1897. His sister cared for him until his death from syphilitic paralysis.

voice_truth

Ignorance is the root of all evils. People criticizing Zakir Naik undoubtly are Ignorant from the light of knowledge. Zakir's success was acknowledged and regarded by the world's biggest scholars having expertize in christianity, hiduism etc. Every one is open to express his/her observations but expressions loaded with bias and ill-intentions will not do any good and are bound to fail to convence the good minds. I am writing this comment not being a Muslim but being a good human being Insha'Allah. It is totally illogical to cite the example of formation of Pakistan. Pakistan is not only the country where Muslim lives. Only 16,000000 Muslims resides there. Brothers come with something concreate (if you have) and logical. Regidity only widen the gap and harm the humanity..... You are welcome to comment provided based on logic. I am not shielding Mr. Naik as I don't worship him - Mr. Naik's value is zero if minus Islam. He is hero and dear to every real human being irrespective of religion.. Brothers come with something strong no good mind will digest this scant criticism... May Allah helps you in understanding what Mr. Naik teaches...

osmaanmajeed

Base less comments by khurmi. Most of them are also unethical. Shame on the singh. If you cannot face the intellects of zakir naik then atleast behave yourself.

azadsingh

nice

Mahela N.

A reply to Dr. Zakir Naik’s comments on Buddhism: www.scribd.com It is “blasphemous” if a buddhist made similar comments on Islam: Albert Einstein once stated Buddhism will remain in the world when all other religions will have vanished, because it alone is not based on the superstitions of one God or many gods or the idea of ‘soul’. Nor is buddhism materialistic. The Buddha was not silent on the teaching of one god or many gods. Lord Buddha taught of ‘no soul’ or no ‘Creator’ concepts in his teachings. Take his saying, ‘One’s creator and destroyer is oneself’. He argued with a person named Sachchaka to the effect there is no soul. One cannot have any sort of liberation by having such superstitions of ‘one God’ or ‘many Gods’ or other illusions created on ‘blind faiths’, to the existence of which illusions no clear or unclear evidence is there. Such ‘blind faiths with perverted states of castration complex’ create chaos in the human civilization. Dr. Zaik cannot prove any of those superstitious beliefs with logic and reason. It is a long time since Nietzche delared ‘God is Dead!’. The world was developed to this extent so that billions of people could live in it now mostly by the awakened Europeans in the last 500 years who have given religions a backward status and used their thinking power for such rapid advancement. It is by their technological, medical etc. advancements billions of us live better now; not by societies that are strict on imposing their faiths and social orders on others, which they do not know they do because of a perverted state of castration complex. Study Freudian psychology to realise how ‘castration complex’ has affected here! Should we allow the whole world to run amok of this perversion and make the whole world an Afghanisthan? The Buddha has asked his followers to test what he preaches and to feel them as experience, and not to accept simply on superficial grounds. He has said ‘These teachings are not for the fools’. One quality of his teaching is ‘see it and feel it then and there!’ His initial experience was not to preach what he discovered because majority of the people would not understand them. He has also told not to believe any doctrine of anyone (including his )because it is preached by a person seen as he is at a higher level, or because it was told by a teacher or because such teachings or traditions coming from the past. Imagine this was said 2500 years ago! Nothing in the Koran can be tested because they all are supposed to happen in future, and they are only ways of living which non Muslims find difficult to comprehend as having valid backgrounds. Buddhists have nothing to do with worshipping of one god or many gods but Buddhists as individuals may pray for gods or not according to their understanding of the world which has nothing to do with Buddhism. While one believes in a faith one does foolish things too as done by adherents of all religions. Buddhists are not expected to throw stones at them or declare wars against them! When Afghans destroyed a buddha’ statue no buddhist declared war on them, or made remarks of hatred of anger towards them, because buddhsists know such acts are done out of confusion in their minds out of foolishness. That is real ‘Rahim’ (Arabic word for ‘maithri’); no ‘eye to eye’ or ‘life to life’ in buddhsim. No holy or unholy wars are there in buddhsim! Those are in western religions. Praying too is in the Judaic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam (because they originated in the Judaic community as traditions of Jewish history). Hindus too pray. In Buddhism it is only paying respect and devotion to Buddha seen as praying by people of Judaic thinking, which buddhist practice resembles a Marxist saluting in front of a portrait of Marx. May be some Buddhists pray out of ignorance which has nothing to do with the teachings of the Buddha. According to a statement in the Dhammapada “Foolishly, people pray for stones, trees gods etc. because of their fear for the unknown” This is what Buddha’s teaching on praying for non verifiable hallucinations. The root of suffering is ‘avidya’ or ignorance, not ‘desires’ as Dr. Zakir has perverted it, to convey his repressed desire to humiliate The Buddha. Removal of ‘avidya’ or ‘ignorance’ makes one to realise the ‘true state of things’ (thathagatha) and the true state of attachments. One who ‘realises’ (not ‘knows’) ‘the true state of things’ does not suffer. This phrase ‘one who knows true state of things’ is not only to be known but to realise as experience too which is clearly stated in Buddhism as two things which Dr. Zakir has not found. Dr. Zakr will never understand these things so it is better if he does not comment on what he vaguely knows, or have thorough discussions with those who know before he preaches. Buddha’s teachings had been memori

ismaniyar

Instead of breeding hatred, Mr. Khurmi should confront Dr. Zakir Naik and get his doubts cleared..

zac73

Dear Brother Khurmi, Isolate the two elements of your hatred - 1. Dr Zakir Naik and 2. the great faith of Islam itself. Hah. You have even brought Pakistan into it. I can understand since you are a Punjabi who has probably lost his family lands due to the partition, but that does not give you the right to say whatever you want to, about Islam itself. Before talking about Islam, which you undoubtedly do not understand, please take a moment to consider what your own confused faith of Hinduism has to say about all the issues you have raised. I doubt if you can research it in any validated religious texts in the whole confused babel that is modern day Hinduism. Learn and honor your own faith first, and do not attempt to dishonor that of others, if you do not have the emotional energy to study. It is easy to fall prey to hatred. Learn to tolerate first, before labeling others intolerant. Please remember that. Cheers, Zac