eurobank efg

.
2000-2009
10%,
, ,
.
, () , ()
, ,

.

,
.
.

.
359

ENO :

1.
, ,
1 2001. ,
. ,

2000-2009 .
, 9% ( )
27% ( , 1). ,
2000 17% ( ) 21% ().
,
,
2000. ,
.

,
.
.
1

2000-2009

19

20

21

, Eurostat

19

17

21

18

27

18

19

19

: , , - Ameco, ,

; ;

;
, ;
.

.
,
: (
360

)
(
). .
2000
10%
7% , ,
.
. ,
,
. , , .
, ,
. ,
. ,

( ), ( ),
. , .
, , , . ,
, 80%
, 2000 5% .
.

.
,
, .

.

, ,
.
,
,
(, ) .
.
, - 15% -,
, ,
.
, , ,
,
.
361

ENO :

, ,
, , .
,
.
,
10-
.
(97% 2010) ,
,
.

.
,
. ,
. ,
.
. ,
( )
,
.

2. ;
,
. ,
,
,
, , .1 ,
:
1.  ,
, ,
, , ..
, .
2. 
, . ,

, -

 , Lipschitz and McDonald (1992), Turner and Van

tdack (1993), Agenor (1995), Marsch and Tokarick (1996), et al. (2010).

362

. ,
, , .
, ,
, , (
) . , ,
,
.
(
) . ,


.
,
.
, 2. ,
, - ( , , ..). ,
, . ,
,
.

3.
.
( ).
() ()
. ,
, .
, ,
. ,
(
).
, ( Nominal Unit Labor Cost). ,
,
, , .


. ,
.
,
.

363

ENO :

, ,
,
, .
,

.

4.

.
,
( Balasa-Samuelson).
, (
, 2000 4%
3). ,
35 20% 2000 (
1). .
. ,
1996,
. ,
1,2% ( 2).
(0,9% ), (2,6% ).
2


*
( )

1996-2009

2001-2009

-1,47

0,12

1,34

3,13

1,16

1,98

0,88

1,99

1,95

2,65

1,38

1,64

* 35
: , Ameco. : PLCDQ

 Eurostat, 22% 2000-2009,

26%, . AMECO, RWGDE, RWCDC.

364

35
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
2000

2001

2002

DEU

2003
IRL

2004
GRC

2005

2006
ESP

2007
ITL

2008

2009

PRT

: Eurostat, Ameco, PLCDQ. DEU: , IRL: , GRC: , ESP: ,

ITL: , PRT:

5.

, , ,
.. , ,
, 35% 4.
, ,
78%, 12% 3,6% , .
.
65% , 26% 9%
, .
, , ()
, ()
, , ,
, , .

AMECO. 5.

 , 30% , 5%.
( ,
, ..),
.

 , 2009 ( 2008)

365

ENO :


( 12 )
Greece: Unit Labor Cost relative to major trading partners

200

180

160

140

120

100

80
2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Industry

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Agriculture

: Eurostat, Ameco

. ,

, (). .

, 20006. ,
.
2 .
, ,
39%
. , ,
10% .

: , , , .
.
6

 2000 : , , , ,

, , , , , , , .

366

6.



, , . , ,
, . ,
, 20%
. , . ,
4%,
. ,
. ,
( ) .
,
, ,
, , , .
2000 ,
(), 5% ( 3). ,

19%
. ,
2000 15%.
3


( )
125
120
115
110
105
100
95
90
2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Relative ULCs against 6 competitors in tourism

Relative ULCs against 12 trading partners in goods exports

: Eurostat, Ameco

367

2009

ENO :

(
)
: (1) , , (2) ,
, (3)
, , ,
.
4 , .

, , , , .


. 2009

2000.
4

110
108
106
104
102
100
98
96
94
92
2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Relative ULCs against 6 competitors in tourism

Relative prices against 6 competitors in tourism

: Eurostat, Ameco,

368

2008

2009

7.

10% 2000

,
.

.
2000. 5
2000,
, , , Eurostat,
. ( New)
10% 2000 ( ),
18-26% . ,

(20012003), 2004.
. ,
2000-2004 12% 36 .
,
, .
5


( )
130
125
120
115
110
105
100
95
90
2000

2001
ECB

2002

2003
OECD

2004
IMF

2005
BoG

2006

2007
New

2008
Eurostat

: , , , , Eurostat

369

2009

ENO :

8. 
,
2
. ,
, .
,
, .
, , ,
, .
,
. , . ,
, 2, , . ,

.
6
7.
30% 2000
, 15%. , 30% 15%
.
6

160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Industry

2005

Agriculture

2006

2007

2008

Services

: Eurostat, Ameco

 ( AMECO 8.2 , Eurostat

).
. .

370

, (
) .

. , 7% 2000-2009
.
, 15% .
, ,
.

.

9. 


(, ,
, ..).
7 . ,
5 ( 74% 2000 79% 2009)
.
( 2000),
26% ,
.
,
.8

. ,
,
.
7

( )
2000

6%

2009

6%

5%

12%

14%

74%

79%

: Eurostat, Ameco

4%

 Obstfeld and Rogoff (2004) Ruscher and Wolff (2009).

371

ENO :

,
.

(.. )
.
,
(REER)
( REERT)
( REER):
REER = REERT

REERNT

EP/P* = (EPT/P*T) x (P/PT)/(P*/P*T)

(1)

, P (
), P* PT (P*T)
( ).
6

(REERT).
(REER) .9
8

120
115
110
105
100
95
90
2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

: Eurostat, Ameco .
8 .
: 2000 , 2009
1,10 . REERNT = REER / REERT
REER (AMECO)
REERT 6. .

, 35 meco
, 6 Ameco.
.

372

8,
10,5% ,
, .

13%, (2009). , Chin and Prasad (2003) Lee et al. (2008).

10. 


10- . , ,

,
. , ,

. ,
60% 10-.
, ,
,
. 40%
2000 2009.
9 (REER)
(REER tradables).
Ameco (Eurostat) .10
7%,
17% 2009. 10% ( 8).

10

 .

373

ENO :



120
115
110
105
100
95
2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

REER

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

REER tradables

: , Eurostat, Ameco

11. 
;
,
.

, 20-30%.
,
.
. ,
.
. ( ),
.

, .
,
.
2010
( 6%
). 8-10
,
374

, ,

. , ,
.
2,4% , 0,8% -16.
: 7% 3,5% EE-16
1995-2008.
, ,
.
,
,
,
. ,
(, )
. ,
.

375

ENO :

, ., . . (2010),
, : ., . . (eds), : , , 2010.

Agenor, P. R. (1995), Competitiveness and External Trade Performance of the French Manufacturing Industry, IMF
Working Paper, No. 95/137.
Chin, M. D. and E. S. Prasad (2003), Medium Term Determinants of Current Accounts in Industrial and Developing
Countries: An Empirical Exploration, Journal of International Economics, vol. 59, pp. 47-76.
European Commission (2009), Competitiveness Developments within the Euro Area. In: European Commission,
Quarterly Report on the Euro Area, vol. 8, No. 1.
Lee, J., G. M. Milesi-Perretti, J. Ostry, A. Prati and L. Ricci (2008), Exchange Rate Assessments: CGER ethodologies,
IMF Occasional Paper, No. 261.
Lipschitz, L. and D. McDonald (1992), Real Exchange Rates and Competitiveness: A Clarification of Concepts, and
Some Measurements for Europe, Empirica, vol. 19, pp. 37-69.
Marsch, I. W. and S. P. Tokarick (1996), An Assessment of Three Measures of Competitiveness, Weltwirtschaftliches
Archiv, vol. 132, pp. 700-732.
Obstfeld, M. and K. Rogoff (2004), The unsustainable US current account position revisited, NBER Working Paper,
No. 10869.
Ruscher, E. and G. B. Wolff (2009), External Rebalancing is not an Exporters Story: Real Exchange Rates, the Nontradable Sector and the Euro, European Commission, European Economy - Economic Paper, No. 375.
Turner, P. and J. Van tdack (1993), Measuring International Competitiveness, BIS Economic Papers, No. 39.

AMECO: Sectoral unit labor cost and price indices.
OECD: REER based on relative consumer prices. Ecowin series code: oe:grc_cpidra
OECD: REER based on unit labor costs of the manufacturing sector. Ecowin series code: oe:grc_ulcmdra
IMF-IFS: REER based on relative consumer prices. Ecowin series code: ifs:s17400reczfy
IMF-IFS: REER based on unit labor costs. Ecowin series code: ifs:s17400relzfa
ECB: Harmonized Competitiveness Indicator, GDP deflator deflated. Series name: Real Harmonized Competitiveness Indicator,
GDP deflator deflated.
ECB: Harmonized Competitiveness Indicator, unit labor costs in total economy deflated. Series name: Real Harmonized
Competitiveness Indicator, unit labor costs in total economy deflated.
Bank of Greece: REER based on relative consumer prices, 2009 Governors Annual Report.
Bank of Greece: REER based on relative unit labor costs in total economy, 2009 Governors Annual Report.

376