Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
12-15388 #21

12-15388 #21

Ratings: (0)|Views: 53|Likes:
Published by Equality Case Files
Doc #21- BLAG's (1) Response to DOJ's motion to consolidate and expedite, (2) Motion to stay pending decision of DOJ's request for initial hearing en banc, and (3) Motion to Dismiss case # 12-15409
Doc #21- BLAG's (1) Response to DOJ's motion to consolidate and expedite, (2) Motion to stay pending decision of DOJ's request for initial hearing en banc, and (3) Motion to Dismiss case # 12-15409

More info:

Published by: Equality Case Files on Apr 11, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/11/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
No. 12-15388_________
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
_________KAREN GOLINSKI,Plaintiff - Appellee,v.U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al.,Defendants - Appellees,THE BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THEU.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant
 
_________On Appeal from a Final Order of the U.S. District Courtfor the Northern District of California_________
APPELLANT BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP’S(I) RESPONSE TO EXECUTIVE BRANCH APPELLEES’ MOTION TOCONSOLIDATE AND EXPEDITE APPEALS,(II) MOTION FOR STAY PENDING RULING ON EXECUTIVE BRANCHAPPELLEES’ PETITION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC, AND(III) MOTION TO DISMISS NO. 12-15409
Case: 12-15388 04/05/2012 ID: 8128952 DktEntry: 21-1 Page: 1 of 28
(1 of 39)
 
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................. iiBACKGROUND .................................................................................... 2DISCUSSION ......................................................................................... 15CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 19CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case: 12-15388 04/05/2012 ID: 8128952 DktEntry: 21-1 Page: 2 of 28
(2 of 39)
 
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
 Cases
 Adolph Coors Co. v. Brady
,944 F.2d 1543 (10th Cir. 1991) .................................................... 8
  Ameron, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs
,787 F.2d 875 (3d Cir. 1986) ......................................................... 8, 13
 Barnes v. Carmen
, 582 F. Supp. 163(D.D.C. 1984) ............................................................................... 8, 13
 Barnes-Wallace v. City of San Diego
,607 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2010) ...................................................... 18
 Bishop v. United States
,No. 4:04-cv-00848 (N.D. Okla.)................................................... 3, 7
 Bldg. and Const. Trades Dep’t v. Reich
,40 F.3d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1994) ...................................................... 13
 Bowen v. Kendrick 
,483 U.S. 1304 (1987) ................................................................... 10
 Bryant v. Yellen
,447 U.S. 352 (1980)...................................................................... 13
Chadha v. INS
,No. 77-1702 (9th Cir.) .................................................................. 12
Cheng Fan Kwok v. INS
,392 U.S. 206 (1968)...................................................................... 12
Cozen O’Connor, P.C. v. Tobits
,2:11-cv-00045 (E.D. Pa.) .............................................................. 7
 Diamond v. Charles
,476 U.S. 54 (1986)........................................................................ 13
Case: 12-15388 04/05/2012 ID: 8128952 DktEntry: 21-1 Page: 3 of 28
(3 of 39)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->