Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2012-04-13 - MS - TAITZ v DPoMS, Et Al. - SoS Answer (Filed)

2012-04-13 - MS - TAITZ v DPoMS, Et Al. - SoS Answer (Filed)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 219|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Apr 13, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/31/2015

pdf

text

original

 
FILED
CIRCIDTCOURTOFIDNDSCOUNTY,MISSISSIPP:tAPR
13
2012
FIRSTJUDICIALDISTRICT
BARBARADUNN,CIRCUITCLERK
B.C
DR.ORLYTAITZ,ESQ.~~R
v.
CIVILACTIONNO.251-12-107CIVDEMOCRATPARTYOFMISSISSIPPI;SECRETARYOFSTATEMISSISSIPPIRESPONDENTSTheMississippiSecretaryofState'sAnswerandDefensestoPetitionMississippiSecretaryofStateDelbertHosemannsubmitsthisAnswerandDefensestothepetitionfiled
in
thiscauseandstates:ANSWERTheSecretaryofStaterespondstotheavermentscontainedinthePetition,paragraph-by-paragraph,asfollows:Theavermentscontainedintheunnumberedparagraphonpages1and2ofthePetitionbeginningwith"Petitionerhereinisseeking..."statelegalconclusionsand/orotherwisesetforthnoavermentsrequiringaresponsebytheSecretaryofState.IftheSecretaryofStateismistakeninthisregard,theavermentsinsuchunnumberedparagrapharedenied.Theavermentscontainedinthe.unnumberedparagraphcontinuingonpages2through4ofthePetitionundertheheading"23-15-961"appeartorecitecertainportionsofMiss.CodeAnn.§23-15-961.ThestatutoryprovisionsspeakforthemselvesanddonotrequirearesponsebytheSecretaryofState.1.Deniedasstated.TheSecretaryofStateadmitsonlythatthedocumentaffixedtothePetitionasExhibit1speaksforitself.2.TheSecretaryofStateiswithoutinformationsufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthoftheavermentscontainedinparagraph2,therefore,suchavermentsaredenied.
 
3.Theaverments
in
paragraph3statealegalconclusionthatdoesnotrequirearesponsebytheSecretaryofState.IftheSecretaryofStateismistaken
in
thisregard,theaverments
in
paragraph3aredenied.4.TheSecretaryofStateiswithoutinformationsufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthoftheavermentscontained
in
paragraph4,therefore,suchavermentsaredenied.5.Theaverments
in
paragraph5statealegalconclusionthatdoesnotrequirearesponsebytheSecretaryofState.IftheSecretaryofStateismistakeninthisregard,theavermentsinparagraph5aredenied.6.Theaverments
in
paragraph6statealegalconclusionandreferstotheConstitutionoftheUnitedStates,whichspeaksforitself,andthereforedonotrequirearesponsebytheSecretaryofState.IftheSecretaryofStateismistakeninthisregard,theavermentsinparagraph6aredenied.7.Theavermentsinparagraph7statealegalconclusionthatdoesnotrequirearesponsebytheSecretaryofState.IftheSecretaryofStateismistaken
in
thisregard,theaverments
in
paragraph7aredenied.8.TheSecretaryofStateiswithoutinformationsufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthoftheavermentscontained
in
paragraph8,therefore,suchavermentsaredenied.9.Deniedasstated.TheSecretaryofStateadmitsonlythatthedocumentsaffixedtothePetitionasExhibits2and4speakforthemselves.Anyandallremainingavermentscontainedinparagraph9,includingsubparts(a)through(f),aredenied.11.[sic]Deniedasstated.TheSecretaryofStateadmitsonlythattheSupremeCourtopinionreferenced
in
paragraph11[sic]speaksforitself.Anyandallremainingaverments
2
 
containedinparagraph
11
aredenied.10.[sic]Theavermentsinparagraph10[sic]statelegalconclusionsthatdonotrequirearesponsebytheSecretaryofState.IftheSecretaryofStateismistakeninthisregard,theavermentsinparagraph10[sic]aredenied.TheSecretaryofStatedeniestheavermentscontainedintheunnumberedparagraphbeginningonpage7ofthePetitionwith"Basedonalloftheabove..."andspecificallydeniesthatPetitionerisentitledtoanyreliefwhatsoever.AnyandallavermentsofthePetitionthathavenotbeenspecificallyadmittedareherebydenied.
FIRSTDEFENSE
ThePetitionfailstostateaclaimuponwhichreliefmaybegranted.
SECONDDEFENSE
TheCourtlackssubjectmatterjurisdictionoverthePetition.
TIDRDDEFENSE
ThePetitionshouldbedismissedforlackofstanding,lackofripeness,rnootness,and/orasthePetitionotherwiseassertsnojusticiablerighttorelief.
FOURTHDEFENSE
ThePetitionshouldbedismissedforinsufficiencyofprocess,insufficiencyofserviceofprocess,and/orfailuretojoinindispensableparties.
FIFTHDEFENSE
TheSecretaryofStatepleadsalldefenseswhichheis,ormaybecome,entitledtopursuanttoand/orarisingunderMiss.CodeAnn.§§23-15-961,23-15-1089,including,butnot3

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Jack Ryan liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->