2
Section 1, Clause 5, of the Constitution of the United States.Furthermore, the Respondent's challenged failure to perform legallyprescribed constitutional duties is directly related to Article 6, Section 3,wherein she is required to swear an oath to uphold the United StatesConstitution.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This emergency application is brought to this Honorable Court from afinal decision of the Honorable Connecticut Supreme Court, issued Nov. 32008, dismissing Applicant's complaint. Before that, Applicant's initialConnecticut Superior Court complaint was dismissed on October 24, 2008for lack of jurisdiction.
REQUEST THAT APPLICATION BE TREATED AS PETITION FOR WRIT OFCERTIORARI AND/OR MANDAMUS AND /OR PROHIBITION
Because the Electoral College is set to meet in three weeks, Applicantrespectfully submits there is no time for a more formal approach to theissues listed herein. In
Bush v. Gore,
531 U.S. 98 at 98 (2000), thisHonorable Court accepted an emergency stay application as a full petition:"Governor Bush and Richard Cheney, Republican Candidatesfor the Presidency and Vice Presidency, filed an emergencyapplication for a stay of this mandate. On December 9, wegranted the application, treated the application as a petition for a writ of certiorari, and granted certiorari."
In
Purcell v. Gonzales
, 127 S. Ct. 5 (2006), this Honorable Court construedan application for a stay as a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, and then grantedCertiorari in an election dispute - two weeks before election day - regarding
Add a Comment