Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
P. 1
WHAM Theory

WHAM Theory

Ratings: (0)|Views: 492 |Likes:
Published by AffNeg.Com

More info:

Published by: AffNeg.Com on Dec 16, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/30/2012

pdf

text

original

 
SDI 2006
1
GHD
Theory
Theory
Theory.............................................................................................................................................................................1 Neg Fiat Good.................................................................................................................................................................2 Neg Fiat Bad...................................................................................................................................................................3Agent CP’s Good............................................................................................................................................................4Agent CP’s Bad...............................................................................................................................................................5PIC’s Good......................................................................................................................................................................6PIC’s Bad........................................................................................................................................................................7Dispositional CP’s Good.................................................................................................................................................8Dispositional CP’s Bad...................................................................................................................................................9Dispositional PIC’s Good..............................................................................................................................................10Dispositional PIC’s Bad................................................................................................................................................11Conditional Advocacies Good......................................................................................................................................12Conditional Advocacies Good (Kritik & CP spec.)......................................................................................................13Conditional Advocacies Bad.........................................................................................................................................14Consult CP’s Good........................................................................................................................................................15Consult CP’s Bad..........................................................................................................................................................162NC Counterplans Good...............................................................................................................................................172NC CP’s Bad...............................................................................................................................................................18Textual Competition Best..............................................................................................................................................19Functional Competition Best........................................................................................................................................2050 State Fiat Good.........................................................................................................................................................2150 State Fiat Bad...........................................................................................................................................................22International Fiat Good.................................................................................................................................................23International Fiat Bad....................................................................................................................................................24Multiple Actor Fiat Good..............................................................................................................................................25Multiple Actor Fiat Bad................................................................................................................................................26Object Fiat Good...........................................................................................................................................................27Object Fiat Bad.............................................................................................................................................................28Utopian Fiat Good.........................................................................................................................................................29Utopian Fiat Bad...........................................................................................................................................................30Performance Contradictions Good................................................................................................................................31Performance Contradictions Bad..................................................................................................................................32Severance Perms Good.................................................................................................................................................33Severance Perms Bad....................................................................................................................................................34Severance Perms Good (Representations)....................................................................................................................35Severance Perms Bad (Representations).......................................................................................................................36Intrinsic Perms Good....................................................................................................................................................37Intrinsic Perms Bad.......................................................................................................................................................38Vagueness Good............................................................................................................................................................39Vagueness Bad..............................................................................................................................................................40Test Case Fiat Good......................................................................................................................................................41Test Case Fiat Bad.........................................................................................................................................................42ASPEC..........................................................................................................................................................................43AT: ASPEC....................................................................................................................................................................44OSPEC..........................................................................................................................................................................45AT: OSPEC...................................................................................................................................................................46Floating PIK’s Good.....................................................................................................................................................47Floating PIK’s Bad........................................................................................................................................................48 No Text to Alt Good......................................................................................................................................................49 No text to Alt Bad.........................................................................................................................................................50Err Neg on Theory........................................................................................................................................................51Err Aff on Theory..........................................................................................................................................................52
 
SDI 2006
2
GHD
Theory
Neg Fiat Good
 Long Shell 
1.Debate has changed. As topics got bigger, affs defended plans instead of the wholeresolution, reciprocally, It’s now only the negatives job to disprove the plan.1.Its Recipricol, the neg should get fiat too2.Opportunity cost- Counterplan functions like a disad to the plan.3.More real world, trains us to find the best policy option4.It’s predictable and widely accepted in debate.5.Turn- Increases aff ground they can read disads to the CP6.You cant make the negative defend the racist, sexist status quo if a case might just betrue.7.Aff gets to choose the topic of debate, has unlimited prep time, higher win percentageand first and last speech, the neg needs counterplans8.Lit checks fiat abuse9.Not a voter- Its an argument to reject the CP
 Short Shell 
1.Debate has changed. As topics got bigger, affs defended plans instead of the wholeresolution, reciprocally, It’s now only the negatives job to disprove the plan.2.Opportunity cost- Counterplan functions like a disad to the plan- if the aff passes thenwe can no longer do the CP.3.Reciprocity- the aff gets it so should the negative.4.You cant make the negative defend the racist, sexist status quo if a case might just betrue.5.Lit checks fiat abuse6.Not a voter- Its an argument to reject the CP
 
SDI 2006
3
GHD
Theory
Neg Fiat Bad
1.Kills aff ground- every problem has more than one solution2.Time skew, we have show the harms in the squo and defend a plan of action, thenegative gets 8 minutes just to build on our work 3.No resolution mandate- fiat comes from the should in the resolution for the affirmative4.No restriction on fiat- the aff only gets the USFG, the negative gets everyone else in theworld5.Moots the 1AC, we argue whether or not the CP solves rather than should we pass theaff plan.6.Voter for Fairness

Activity (7)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Luke Hartman liked this
Andrew Golsch liked this
bpower205 liked this
luthv liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->