We examine tropospheric temperature trends of 67 runs from 22 Climate of the 20th Century model simulations and try to reconcile them with the best available updated observations (in the tropics du...
We examine tropospheric temperature trends of 67 runs from 22 Climate of the 20th Century model simulations and try to reconcile them with the best available updated observations (in the tropics during the satellite era). Model results and observed temperature trends are in disagreement in most of the tropical troposphere, being separated by more than twice the uncertainty of the model mean. In layers near 5 km, the modelled trend is 100 to 300% higher than observed, and, above 8 km, modelled and observed trends have opposite signs. These conclusions contrast strongly with those of recent publications based on essentially the same data.
The AGW advocates are not only cooking their data now, they're cooking their own history. I've just seen a graph on one of the blogs that shows a high-troposphere hotspot for solar warming. Unfortunately the resolution was not sufficient for me to actually discern the fingerpaint marks...
"I completely favor taking all the environmental actions called for by Global Warming advocates. It's just that every time I look at studies of the issue, I can't help thinking the authors are cooking the data to conform to their notion that man is altering the environment."
I heartily concur!
It will be interesting to see how this article is received since the scientific community seems to be loath to admit the emperor has no clothes.
My theory of Global Warming (or Climate Change, to be politically correct) is that it is caused by British academics having to suffer months without sight of the sun and it has been getting worse for the past 150 years.
I completely favor taking all the environmental actions called for by Global Warming advocates. It's just that every time I look at studies of the issue, I can't help thinking the authors are cooking the data to conform to their notion that man is altering the environment.
Login or Signup to Scribble a Comment
or use Facebook Connect
craigg4c Scribbled:
The AGW advocates are not only cooking their data now, they're cooking their own history. I've just seen a graph on one of the blogs that shows a high-troposphere hotspot for solar warming. Unfortunately the resolution was not sufficient for me to actually discern the fingerpaint marks...
s600 Scribbled:
"I completely favor taking all the environmental actions called for by Global Warming advocates. It's just that every time I look at studies of the issue, I can't help thinking the authors are cooking the data to conform to their notion that man is altering the environment." I heartily concur!
Squeakycat.com Scribbled:
It will be interesting to see how this article is received since the scientific community seems to be loath to admit the emperor has no clothes. My theory of Global Warming (or Climate Change, to be politically correct) is that it is caused by British academics having to suffer months without sight of the sun and it has been getting worse for the past 150 years. I completely favor taking all the environmental actions called for by Global Warming advocates. It's just that every time I look at studies of the issue, I can't help thinking the authors are cooking the data to conform to their notion that man is altering the environment.