Scheduling & Logistics Meeting Minutes January 25 January 27, 2005

Attendees:
Name Jane Foard Anita Benson Kathy Smith John Poust Jolene Fuqua Affiliation McKesson Datascene Steris Rouland-Borg Corporation Group Health E-mail Address Jane.foard@mckesson.com Anita@datascene.com KathleenM._Smith@steris.com John.Poust@Rouland.com Jolene.Fuqua@ghc.org

Monday AM No meeting Monday PM No meeting Tues AM Co-chairs Anita Benson, Jane Foard Reviewed Agenda Worked on V3 Materials Management modeling for item master catalog and inventory item messaging. Included new Device instance in the D-Mim to be used for Patient Safety.

C:\HL7\January 2005\Minutes\InventoryMaster.vsd

Tues PM - Co-chairs Jane Foard Continued review of 2.6 ballot comments for chapter 10, 17, and comments related to Inventory Management from chapter 8. Wednesday AM - Co-chairs Jane Foard Continued and completed review of for chapter 10, 17, and comments related to Inventory Management from chapter 8.

93752367.doc

C:\HL7\January 2005\V2.6 Committee Reconciliation\To website\Ballot Response Dispositions From Jan 2005 meeting.zip

Wednesday PM - Co-chairs Jane Foard, Anita Benson Began and completed review of V3 ballot, Scheduling Release 2.

C:\HL7\January 2005\Minutes\V3_SC_R2_C2_2005JANAmalgamated.xls

Thursday AM - Co-chairs Jane Foard Gave Scheduling tutorial and reviewed possible use of scheduling messages to schedule resources (nurses) for assignment to beds to help new vendor to understand this domain in order to expand communication to/from their application. Thursday PM Attended the V2.6 Publishing Committee session. Addressed publishing issues such as formatting changes in the published chapters,CNE vs CWE. Scott to contact CQ and communicate that we need final clarification of the definitions of CNE and CWE before all publishing issues can be resolved. (See Publishing Committee minutes) Comment to add the UAC segment is valid that it needs to be added. SFT was added in V2.5, it was optional to add only because there were time constraints, therefore there should have been/should be an erratum. UAC addition to Ch10 could be posed to John Quinn (it will have to be since it is substantive) to add as an erratum to V2.6. Check to see if V2.5 has an erratum against it for the SFT addition to all messages. Field length change discussion. Most members were of the thought that the field length could not be changed to match the Ch2 maximum field length for each data type. Discussion to be continued. Comments referencing CH2A are in regards to field length. A change to a data type that was incorrect, and needs to roll back to the data type that was published during Committee level, is nonsubstantive. Friday No meeting

93752367.doc