Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Christopher Carrico, Collateral Damage, and Britain: Feeding the Beast of Deception on Gay Rights

Christopher Carrico, Collateral Damage, and Britain: Feeding the Beast of Deception on Gay Rights

Ratings: (0)|Views: 150 |Likes:
Published by RogerWilliams
An Initial Response to "Collateral Damage: The Social Impact of Laws Affecting LGBT Persons in Guyana". Christopher Carrico and Britain are Feeding the Beast of Deception on Gay Rights in Guyana.
An Initial Response to "Collateral Damage: The Social Impact of Laws Affecting LGBT Persons in Guyana". Christopher Carrico and Britain are Feeding the Beast of Deception on Gay Rights in Guyana.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: RogerWilliams on Apr 25, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Christopher Carrico and Britain: Feeding the Beast of Deception on Gay Rights in Guyana?
An initial response to Christopher Carrico’s “
Collateral Damage: The Social Impact of Laws Affecting LGBT Persons inGuyana
Gay militancy and advocacy is built on
a hoax … the avoidance of the evidence
, the deception of its victims cum supporters
stupendous proportions.
The University of the West Indies‟ Cave Hill Faculty of Law may be unwittingly feeding the deception.
How responsible is UWI being … because the “social impact” of works promoting gay advocacy will ultimately be judged by their
 complete exclusion of references to the detail provided in law reviews like
http://www.mega.nu/ampp/baldwin_pedophilia_homosexuality.pdf  )?Christopher Carrico has just produced a s
tudy “
Collateral Damage
….” and
, as we turn to peruse its contents, some initial questionsneed to be asked
and some baseline(s) established.
The analytical and investigative perspective
:We have alluded before to two statements that summarize the investigative perspective that should inform all, repeat all analyses of publications emanating from gay-
activist camps. Carrico‟s “study” deserves no less rigour
in any assessment!First, as considered in the response to Nadia Sagar, and
as to Guyana the “secular
relative to “gay rights”,
we have yet to finda more concise statement on the relationship between state, government, man and God as that offered by Daniel Garcia and RobertRegie
r in the online article “
Homosexuality is Not a Civil Right 
” (
www.crrange.com/wall34.html ). Ad nauseam, we seek recourse
yet again to those words: “…
When protecting one’s inalienable and civil rights, the government must discern between liberty and 
license. This requires that rights attach to persons because of their humanity, not because of their behaviors, and certainly not thosebehaviors that Weste
rn legal and moral tradition has regarded as inimical to the "Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God," as stated in
the Declaration. Yet, today some advocate granting "rights" to behaviors hostile to the most fundamental forms of self-government 
family, church, and community. This is especially the case with homosexual activists, who ironically seek to hijack the moral capital of the civil rights movement 
Dr. Joseph Nicolosi in “
The Removal of Homosexuality from the Psychiatric Manual 
 “studies” of the sort
attempted by Carrico in these fatal words:
Militant gay advocates working in a small but forceful network have caused apathy and confusion within our society. They insist that acceptance of the homosexual as a person cannot occur without endorsement of the homosexual condition. Intellectual circles too
who are self-conscious about sounding intolerant 
 proclaim homosexuality as normal, yet it is still not so for the average person for whom it “just doesn’t seem right 
Should Christians and Muslims in Guyana be worried?
Homosexuality and Transgenderism as medical conditions are the only mental/psycho-sexual disorders that set up as their non-negotiable and ultimate goal/end the destruction of key creation-structures in the Judeo-Christian Worldview ... Evidence, Fact,Truth, Sex, Marriage, Family, Manhood, Womanhood!How significant is this?
The 56% of Guyana‟s voting population who are Christian, and the 20% or more who are
Muslims, would surely be interested in ananswer. We have asked searching questions of the Hindu
worldview in the online article “
 Aksharananda’s Delusion onHomosexuality: Western Values and their Usurpation by “Gay Rights/Human Rights” 
 “ (
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34519077/Aksharananda%E2%80%99s-Delusion-on-Homosexuality-Western-Values-and-their-Usurpation-by-%E2%80%9CGay-Rights-Human-Rights%E2%80%9D ). These questions have yet to be answered.They should also be guided by the unusually blunt and brutal assessment of current British anti-Christian governmental policy by
Melanie Phillips‟ “
How Britain is Turning Christianity Into a Crime
” (
) ... in the name of „human‟ and „gay‟ rights!
Will Christopher Carrico address this issue in his
... considering its obvious relevance to the legal/moral/social/medicalinsanity of 
 “gay rights” and its „collateral damage” to Western civilization?
Will Carrico cite academic/professional/Police
pedigree in his “study”?
:We though
t we had addressed the issue of the “necessity” of laws against homosexuality and transgenderism in the letter published
in the Kaieteur News of 
February 27, 2010 captioned “
Laws Against Homosexual and Transgender Activity Exist for aNumber of Good Reasons
Then, we dared not speculate that the “UG
Student” and Carrico‟s perspective were other than coincidentally synchronized
in theirintellectual mischief and inattention to evidence and detail. Sadly, if Carrico was indeed at the University of Guyana during thatperiod, we have to revisit that outlook.
Consider the 2002 law review by Dr. Judith Reisman "
Crafting Bi/Homosexual Youth
" ( http://www.drjudithreisman.org... ). In that 60-page indictment,
under the caption “
Hiding Dirty Laundry 
Reisman outlines the astonishing fact that violence WITHIN the
 “gay” community is many, many
, many times greater than that inflicted upon them by usually tolerant societies. It is essentially afunction of raging psychosexual/mental distress!Consider also the seminal 2006-treatment by Matt S
taver “
Transsexualism and the Binary Divide: determining sex UsingObjective Criteria
” (
http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1756 ) . It addresses every case decided on the issue, and we must askif Carrico has addressed the issue with equal intensity and comprehensiveness, or will he
highly suspect
and use partisan resources?The relevant parts of Dr. R
eisman‟s law review are summarized at pages 21 and 22 of the online article “
The Case Against Pancapand the Decriminalization of Homosexuality 
It proves the rule! A psycho-sexual/mental disorder, when given the space toconsider itself "normal" will ALWAYS seek t
o impose its madness on society … by fair means or foul.
But … Carrico will not touch
genuine Police statistics
… or will he?
 Or will his
by a miracle of deception suddenly infer the opposite to what the Police are telling us? Will his credentialed
sources in his “study” include the express written opinion of any medical doctors?
How important
is it to reflect fact, truth and evidence in any “study”?
:To the extent that the aim has always been to provide a basis upon which the people of Guyana can make informed decisions, weshould ask both sasod
and Carrico to advise us where in the latter‟s report we can find reference to the net outworking of Dr. Jos
in the online article “
The Removal of Homosexuality from the Psychiatric Manual 
 All three great pioneers of psychiatry 
Freud, Jung and Adler 
saw homosexuality as disordered. Yet today, homosexuality is not to be found in the psychiatric manual of mental disorders. Were these three great pioneers just reflecting the ignorance and  prejudice of their times? Is this radical shift due to our modern-day enlightened, sophisticated attitude? Has there been any new research to account for this shift of opinion? Submits that no new psychological or sociological research justifies this shift. Researchdid not settle the question. Research simply stopped, and it is politics that has silenced the professional dialogue. Now, the only studies on homosexuality are from an advocacy perspective
The simple and astonishing answer is … Carrico and
cannot … or will not … address this issue.
On what basis, them, is Carrico‟s report founded?
The Case Against Pancap and the Decriminalization of Homosexuality 
” (
and “
The Case Against Crossdressing or Transgenderism in Guyana
Why won’t the British High Commissions, and the OAS, fund studies illustrating the evidence against “gay rights”?
:Since we last heard from him in February 2010, Carrico
very weak effort then has obviously and magically transformed into fundingfrom the Brits.
The last sentence in Nicolosi‟s excerpt above is an equally compelling
indictment of Britain and the British High Commissions inGuyana, Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean. We should leave the Bar Associations of the West Indies to determine if (the
University of the West Indies‟)
Faculty of Law at
Cave Hill‟s subscription to Carrico‟s effort was worthy of their loud, if not
toogenerous, endorsement.Like the OAS, Carrico and his diplomatic accomplices
should show where … if anywhere … they have accommodated the opposing
view by equal and sustained funding. Or supported scholarship in that regard!Searching questions and requests
have previously been asked of Guyana‟s Permanent Representative to the OAS, the OAS
-office inGuyana
, and the OAS‟ Secretariat
in the online article
Response to OAS and PANCAP on Sexual Orientation, and Decriminalizing Homosexuality and Prostitution
” (
The simple and astonishing answer is … the British High Commission
s and the OAS
cannot … or will not …
now so do!
Is an attempt being made to circumvent fact, truth and evidence?
Why this haste and determination to “manufacture” a so
called “basis‟ for gay
-advocacy in Guyana?The
possible … and
answer is that the tactic has been used before in the USA.We should contemplate the words of Dr. Charles Socarides, cited at
Pfox‟s version of “The
Removal of Homosexuality from thePsychiatric Manual 
” (
[In the late 1960’s] Clearly a disturbing trend was developing, with homosexuals banding together, not to
demand help from psychiatry and the medical profession and public recognition of their condition (alongside those individuals with any form of neurosisor emotional disorder) or simply to protest against legal injustices, but to
 proclaim their “normality” and attack all opposition to thisview…..
By declaring a condition a “non
condition,” a group of 
 practitioners had removed it from our list of serious psychosexual disorders
The action was all the more remarkable when one considers that it involved the out-of-hand and peremptory disregard and dismissal not only of hundreds of psychiatric and psychoanalytic research papers and reports, but also of a number of other serious studies by groups of psychiatrists, psychologists, and educators over the past seventy years, for example, the Report of theCommittee of Cooperation with Governmental (Federal) Agencies of the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (1955); the New York Academy of Medicine Report (1964); the Task Force Report of the New York County District Branch of the APAdone in 1970-
72 (Socarides, et. al., 1973)….
Is there a huge medical
basis against “gay rights”?
:So now let's assess the point of view in 2010 of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in all of this ("
FastFacts for HIV/AIDS 2010
) …
and the actuarial impact that an HIV/AIDS infection rate 44 times greater than that for het
erosexuals … can have on Guyana‟s
fragileand abused healthcare system.Gay-advocacy needs entire medical brigades to support the "lifestyle" ... and its militants will always target or suborn the HealthMinister/Ministry in activist states! Read Kathleen
Melonakos‟ “
Why Isn’t Homosexuality Considered a Disorder on the Basis of 
 Its Medical Consequences? 
” (
The simple and astonishing fact is that Carrico … and
have not … addressed this CDC viewpoint!
 It is also a function of raging delusion that they may not ... not once ... consider the already solid medical case for treatment of same-sex-attraction-disorders as outlined in the book by Dr. Jeffrey Satinover "
Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth
The point is … if medical remedy exists, then you do not have to legislate a mental/psychosexual disorder into “normalcy”! Dr
.Satinover lists at Table 7 no less than 15 Secular Outcome Studies that illustrate success (some as high as 82%) in the treatment of same-sex-attraction-disorders.
Therein, perhaps, lies the incentive to develop a new “gay” science
which supports the deathstyle!We should
repeat … gay advocacy in Guyana … and worldwide … is built on a hoax of stupendous proportions!
And Britain continues to feed the beast!
The Dilemma for the Guyana Bar A
ssociation, and Guyana’s Attorney
:An obvious dilemma exists for the
Guyana Bar Association. We raised the possibility in “
 A Blind Pursuit of a Liberal Agenda
that Carrico‟s duplicitous advocacy will raise
this significant point:
Does “gay rights” signal the end of the relevance of evidence, the end of the rational law? 
 As the current Conservative-led but Liberal-controlled administration in Britain rushes to argue before the European Court on HumanRights that Christians do not have the right to wear crucifixes (in 2012) , Justice Antonin Scalia answers us in his read and writtendissent in the case Lawrence v. Texas as outlined at pages 27-
37 in the online article “
The Case Against Pancap and theDecriminalization of Homosexuality 
” (
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17685588/The-Case-Against-PANCAP-and-the-Decriminalization-of-Homosexuality ).In a treatment that gay-activist jurisprudence seeks to avoid like the plague rather than rebut, Scalia is forced to come to the
following astonishing conclusion about the fate of the law in America (and I daresay Guyana): “...
This effectively decrees theend of all morals legislation. If, as the Court asserts, the promotion of majoritarian sexual morality is not evena legitimate state interest, none of the above-mentioned laws can survive rational-basis review 
” Will Christopher Carrico address this in his “study”?
 Somehow ... I think not. But he may yet prove us wrong!
Is Carrico advocating wastage of scarce resources, and not treatment and healing?:
And what will Carrico do with the considered opinion of Dr. Paul McHugh, Distinguished service Professor in Psychiatry at JohnsHopkins. Dr. McHugh's in "
Surgical Sex 
" ( http://www.policystudies.ca/documents/Surgical_Sex_Change.pdf  ) is forced to come to this astonishing conclusion: "...
We have wasted scientific and technical resources and damaged our professional credibility by collaborating with madness rather than trying to study, cure, and ultimately prevent it 
Carrico … and the British High Commission
s in Guyana and the Eastern Caribbean
… will
not address Dr. McHugh‟s
view … or will they?
One inescapable conclusion
:Their failures to attend to these issues/questions will lead to one inescapable conclusion: gay
advocacy in Guyana … and worldwide …
is built on a hoax, a deception, of stupendous proportions!

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->