Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
4 25 12 Yocom Testimony

4 25 12 Yocom Testimony

Ratings: (0)|Views: 0 |Likes:
Published by Michele Lentz

More info:

Published by: Michele Lentz on Apr 25, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





MEDICAIDFederal Oversight of Payments and ProgramIntegrity NeedsImprovement
Statement of Carolyn L. YocomDirector, Health Care
Before the Subcommittees on Health Care, District of Columbia,Census and the National Archives and Regulatory Affairs,Stimulus Oversight and Government Spending, Committee onOversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives
For Release on DeliveryExpected at 9:30 a.m. EDTWednesday, April 25, 2012
United States Government Accountability Office
United States Government Accountability Office
Highlights of  GAO-12-674T, 
a testimony beforethe Subcommittees on Health Care, District of Columbia, Census and the National Archives andRegulatory Affairs, Stimulus Oversight andGovernment Spending, Committee on Oversight andGovernment Reform, House of Representatives
April 25, 2012
Federal Oversight of Payments and ProgramIntegrity Needs Improvement
 Why GAO Did This Study
Medicaid, a joint federal-state healthcare program, financed care for about 67 million people at a cost of $401 billion in fiscal year 2010. At thefederal level, CMS, an agency withinthe Department of Health and HumanServices, is responsible for overseeingthe design and operations of states’Medicaid programs, while the statesadminister their respective programs’day-to-day operations. The sharedfinancing arrangement between thefederal government and the statespresents challenges for programoversight and Medicaid has been onGAO’s list of high-risk programs since2003, in part, because of concernsabout the fiscal management of theprogram. Our prior work has shownthat CMS continues to face challengesoverseeing the Medicaid program.GAO was asked to testify on CMS’soversight of Medicaid. GAO’stestimony is based on prior workconducted from June 1993 throughDecember 2011 related to CMS’soversight of (1) states’ rate settingmethodologies for certain managedcare arrangements, particularly therequirements that rates be actuariallysound; (2) supplemental payments,which are payments made to certainproviders that are separate from and inaddition to standard Medicaidpayments for services; and(3) program integrity, which focuses onensuring that payments made are inthe correct amount, to the correctprovider, for an eligible beneficiary.
 What GAO Found
Oversight of managed care rate-setting has been inconsistent.
In August2010, GAO reported that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)had not ensured that all states were complying with the managed care actuarialsoundness requirements that rates be developed in accordance with actuarialprinciples, appropriate for the population and services, and certified by actuaries.For example, GAO found significant gaps in CMS’s oversight of 2 of the 26 statesreviewed—CMS had not reviewed one state’s rates in multiple years and had notcompleted a full review of another state’s rates since the actuarial soundnessrequirements became effective. Variation in practices across CMS regionaloffices contributed to these gaps and other inconsistencies in the agency’soversight of states’ rate setting. GAO’s previous work also found that CMS’sefforts to ensure the quality of the data used to set rates were generally limited torequiring assurances from states and health plans—efforts that did not providethe agency with enough information to ensure the quality of the data used. Withlimited information on data quality, CMS cannot ensure that states’ managedcare rates are appropriate, which places billions of federal and state dollars atrisk for misspending. GAO made recommendations to improve CMS’s oversight.
Oversight of supplemental payments needs improvement.
GAO has reportedon varied financing arrangements involving supplemental payments—disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments states are required to make tocertain hospitals, and other non-DSH supplemental payments—that increasefederal funding without a commensurate increase in state funding. GAO’s workhas found that while a variety of federal legislative and CMS actions have helpedcurb inappropriate financing arrangements, gaps in oversight remain. For example, while there are federal requirements designed to improve transparencyand accountability for state DSH payments, similar requirements are not inplace for non-DSH supplemental payments, which may be increasing. From2006 to 2010, state-reported non-DSH supplemental payments increased from$6.3 billion to $14 billion; however, according to CMS officials, reporting waslikely incomplete. GAO made numerous recommendations aimed at improvingoversight of supplemental payments.
Challenges exist related to CMS’s role ensuring program integrity.
InDecember 2011, GAO testified that the key challenge CMS faced inimplementing the statutorily established federal Medicaid Integrity Program wasensuring effective coordination to avoid duplicating state program integrity efforts,particularly in the area of auditing provider claims. GAO found that overpaymentsidentified by its audit contractors since fiscal year 2009 were not commensuratewith its contractors’ costs, and CMS reported in 2011 that it was redesigning itsaudit program to achieve better results. Data limitations may have hampered thecontractors’ ability to identify improper claims beyond what states had alreadyidentified. With regard to CMS’s other core oversight activities—annualassessments and triennial comprehensive state program integrity reviews—GAOfound that much of the information collected from the annual assessmentsduplicated information collected during triennial reviews. Finally, CMS’s MedicaidIntegrity Institute, a national training program, appears to promote effective statecoordination and collaboration.
View GAO-12-674T.For more information, contact Carolyn L. Yocom at (202) 512-7114or yocomc@gao.gov.
 Page 1 GAO-12-674T
Chairmen Gowdy and Jordan, Ranking Members Davis and Kucinich, andMembers of the Subcommittees:I am pleased to be here today as you explore oversight of Medicaid—a joint federal-state program that in 2010 financed health care for about67 million people. Given the size and complexity of this $401 billionprogram, the federal government and its state partners continue to facechallenges finding the proper balance between states’ flexibility toadminister their Medicaid programs and the shared federal-stateresponsibility to manage program finances efficiently and economically.Ensuring the program’s long-term sustainability is critical as Medicaidplays a crucial and growing role in providing health care coverage for avariety of vulnerable populations, including certain low-income children,families, and individuals who are aged or disabled.Medicaid is jointly funded by the federal and state governments. At thefederal level, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), anagency within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), isresponsible for overseeing the design and operations of states’ Medicaidprograms, while the states administer their respective programs’ day-to-day operations. Within broad federal requirements, states have someflexibility in deciding the range of medical services to provide, whichindividuals to cover, and the amount to pay providers. The federalgovernment matches state expenditures for most Medicaid services usingthe Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, a statutory formula that isbased, in part, on each state’s per capita income.
The shared financing arrangement between the federal government andthe states, however, presents challenges for program oversight andrequires sustained vigilance on the part of CMS and the Congress. Our prior work has shown that CMS continues to face challenges overseeingthe fiscal management of the Medicaid program. Because of concernsabout the program’s fiscal management, size, growth, and diversity,Medicaid has been on GAO’s list of high-risk programs since 2003. 
Under this statutory formula, the federal government’s share of Medicaid expenditurescan range from 50 to 83 percent.
See GAO,
High-Risk Series: An Update,
 GAO-11-278 (Washington, D. C.: Feb. 2011).

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->