Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword or section
Like this
1Activity
×
P. 1
Cross-Appellant Opening Brief in TriCity v. Sterling

Cross-Appellant Opening Brief in TriCity v. Sterling

Ratings: (0)|Views: 636|Likes:
Published by Scott A McMillan
Respondent's brief and Cross appellant's opening brief filed on behalf of Kathleen Sterling in the failed restraining order case of TriCity Healthcare District v. Kathleen Sterling.
Respondent's brief and Cross appellant's opening brief filed on behalf of Kathleen Sterling in the failed restraining order case of TriCity Healthcare District v. Kathleen Sterling.

More info:

Published by: Scott A McMillan on Apr 26, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

04/26/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 No. D059810IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAFOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICTDIVISION ONE _____________ Tri-City Healthcare District,
 Petitioner/Appellant/Cross-Respondent 
v.Kathleen Sterling,
 Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant 
 Appeal from the Superior Court for San Diego CountySuperior Court No. 37-2011-00052101-CU-PT-NC(Consolidated with: 52102; 52103; 52104; 52112; 52114)Hon. Richard E. Mills, Presiding _____________ RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT’S BRIEF  ___________________________________________________________ Charles M. Kagay – SBN 73377Spiegel Liao & Kagay, LLP388 Market Street, Suite 900San Francisco, CA 94111Telephone: (415) 956-5959Scott A. McMillan, SBN 212506The McMillan Law Firm, APC4670 Nebo Drive, Suite 200La Mesa, California 91941-5230(619) 464-1500 x 14Attorneys for Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant Kathleen Sterling
 
Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.208)
There are no interested entities or persons to list in this certificate.(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.208(e)(3).)DATED: April 25, 2012Spiegel Liao & Kagay, LLPBy______________________ Charles M. KagayAttorneys for Defendant/Appellant/Cross-RespondentKathleen Sterling2
 
Table of Contents
I.INTRODUCTION...................................1II.STATEMENT OF THE CASE.........................1A.Nature of Action, Relief Sought, and JudgmentAppealed From................................1B.Statement of Facts..............................2C.Procedural History............................13RESPONDENTS BRIEF.................................16I.INTRODUCTION..................................16II.ARGUMENT.....................................16A.Summary of Argument.........................16B.TCHD Failed to Request a Statement of Decision....17C.TCHD Improperly Bases Its Challenges on the TrialCourts Statements from the Bench...............18D.Note on Citations to the Record..................22E.The Trial Court’s Exclusion of Hearsay EvidenceCannot Be a Basis for Reversal..................231.The Exclusions TCHD Complains Of AreQuite Limited...........................232.TCHD Waived Its Argument Against theHearsay Rulings by Failing to Make It to theTrial Court.............................26i

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->