Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
Data rom IFC’s Development Outcome racking System (DOS) show strong job growth or companies nanced throughIFC-supported private equity (PE) unds. Te nearly 500 companies covered in this analysis — in which the unds hadinvested about $4.0 billion, o which more than $400 million or 10% in nancing came rom IFC — created nearly 300,000 jobs between 2000 and 2010. Tough job growth rates1 were higher or smaller companies, most jobs were created by largercompanies. Job creation was also strongly and positively correlated with the returns o the unds, showing that good nancialperormance did not come rom cutting jobs, but rom expanding companies — their valuations, revenues, and jobs. Te best job creation occurred when und managers worked with companies with which they were amiliar.
Measuring the job creation eects o IFC-supported private equity unds
1
ASSESSING PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRIBUTIONSTO JOB CREATION:
IFC OPEN SOURCE STUDY
Te sample or the Development Outcome racking System (DOS) consists o:
•69PEfundsclassifiedasgrowthequityfunds.•596companiesinwhichthesefundshadinvestedbetween1/1/2000and12/31/2010.•494ofthesecompaniesthathadreportedinformationonjobs(83%ofinvestments).•Totalinvestmentsbythefundsinthesecompanieswere$4.0billion.•TheportionofIFCinvestmentinthesecompanieswas$405million,or10%ofthetotal.
Here a small or medium-size enterprise (SME)
2
is dened as a company with at least two o three characteristics:
•Lessthanorequalto$15millioninrevenues.•Lessthanorequalto$15millioninassets.•Fewerthanorequalto300employees.
SUMMARY OF STATISTICS FROM THE SAMPLE
STATISTICS SMEs LARGER FIRMS TOTA
Numberofcompanies 306 188
494
Fundinvestment
3
$1.3billion $2.7billion $4.0billionIFCportionofinvestment $158million $247million $405million Jobscreated 54,643 239,149 293,792Fundinvestmentperjobcreated
3
$25,000 $12,000 $14,000IFCportionperjobcreated
3
$3,000 $1,100 $1,400 Jobgrowthrate 18.0% 9.7% 14.7%
Sources: IFC’s management inormation systems, including DOTS
 
2
Investment by PE undshelped stimulate signif-cant job creation
DOS data were available or 494 com-panies, representing $405 million o IFC investment capital. Tese compa-nies have created 293,792 jobs and cur-rently provide, or at the time o exit by the unds provided, 724,478 jobs. For asubset o companies, employment databy gender were available. Tis subseto companies employed about 170,000 women, which represented 41% o jobs.PE unds have been able to leverageIFC’s nancial resources to drive jobgrowth and to extend IFC’s reach by providing capital to SMEs (which ac-counted or 306 o the 494 companies).In Sub-Saharan Arica and South Asia,three-quarters o investments by PEunds were in SMEs (gure 1). Te PEunds have produced strong nancialreturns that compare avorably with theCambridge Associates Private Equity Benchmark.
Expansion-stage companiescreated the most jobs
Te companies that created the most jobs in absolute terms tended to be es-tablished businesses in an expansionary stage. In the portolio o PE unds, thebiggest job creators were in services. Telargest job creation occurred in a retailchain or women’s shoes in China. Itcreated more than 70,000 jobs in oversix years, starting at 17,000 and grow-ing to over 87,000 employees (with anannualized job growth rate o 29.5%). Another investee, a commercial bank inChina, created more than 22,000 jobs, more than doubling employment rom ewer than 21,000 employees to more than43,000 in just over ve years (job growth rate o 14.8%). A third, a restaurant ranchise operator in Latin America, createdmore than 22,000 jobs, starting with about 64,000 employees and growing to more than 86,000 in less than two years (jobgrowth rate o 22.1%).Collectively, the 114,000 jobs represented by these three companies account or more than one-third o the jobs created by the PE unds in the portolio. Tis group also accounted or the largest employer o women, with the restaurant ranchisereporting 49,000 women employees (57%). Given the nature o the business, it is not surprising to see this sector accountor the most jobs created. All these companies started with many employees and high revenues. Te companies were established and operating whenthey raised money rom the investment unds. IFC capital was leveraged and supported by other investors’ money to achievethe impressive job creation results. While these companies did not experience the high job growth rate that many start-upsexperienced, they did create more jobs than other companies in the dataset (gure 2). Job creation in the portolio mirrored regional economic activity during the timerame. Te three highest job creators werein China and Latin America. Tese companies took advantage o economic growth happening in their locations to supportthe expansion o their businesses.
Source: DOTS
Figure 2: Larger companies created more jobs
300,000250,000200,000150,000100,00050,0000
   J  o   b  s   C  r  e  a   t  e   d
Less than 20Employees (117Companies)
Employees at Time of InvestmentJob Creation sinceInvestment (Net)
20-99 Employees(110 Companies)100-300Employees (107Companies)+301 Employees(160 Companies)
Source: DOTS
Figure 1: A globally diversifed portolio with many SMEs inSub-Saharan Arica
120100806040200
   C  o  m  p  a  n   i  e  s
CAFCEACLACMECEUCSAWLDRegionCAF – Sub Saharan AfricaCEA – East AsiaCLA – Latin AmericaCME – Middle EastCEU – Eastern EuropeCSA – South East AsiaWLD - WorldNon SME companySME company
 
3
Small and medium-sizeenterprises grew astest
Tough in absolute terms larger enter-prises created more jobs, the astest jobgrowth rates came rom smaller compa-nies (gure 3). Investments by PE undsin SMEs produced a growth rate o 18%or almost twice the rate o job growth innon-SMEs (9.7%).Tere was great variation among resultsor SMEs but a clear pattern emerged,showing that as companies got larger,the growth rate slowed. Small companies(employing up to 19 workers) and me-dium-size companies (20-99 employees)had job growth o over 20%. As compa-nies got larger, it became more dicultto maintain such aggressive growth, andgrowth rates ell to 11% or less.Identiying and supporting winners is a powerul strategy or PE unds. A cosmetics company in China started with 60employees and within our years had more than 9,200 (job growth rate o 284%). Another SME, a transportation company in India, started with 99 employees and in just over two years had more than 1,500 employees (job growth rate o 239%).Tese are examples o the ast job growth rate that can be achieved by SMEs, which is one reason why investors are interestedin them. Tese two companies’ employment creation numbers are dwared by any o the expansion-stage companies discussedearlier. However, none o the high job creation companies comes close to the growth rates exhibited by these companies.
PE unds combine capital and expertise to drive returns
Fund managers’ incentives are aligned with the successul perormance and exit o portolio investee companies. Fundmanagers provide capital, guidance, contacts, and resources to support their companies. Tis alignment o incentives iscreated by the bonus structure o the PE industry. Te incentives explain why und managers are willing to put in time, net- working, talent, and capital to help their investee companies succeed. Te data show that PE unds can help drive the growthand development o their portolios.Some und managers support a company in an earlier und and then ollow on with investment capital rom successiveunds. One example is an Arican telecom company. It was a start-up in 2001 but grew to 2,200 employees with $4 billion inrevenues in 2010. Tis growth was assisted by multiple investments rom the und management team that ran several unds in Arica. Tree unds invested in the company or a total o $4.5 million. Te rst und was considered an SME und; the other
Source: DOTS
Figure 3: Smaller companies had aster job growth rates
25%20%15%10%5%0%
   J  o   b   G  r  o  w   t   h  r  a   t  e   (   C   A   G   R   )
Less than 20Employees (117Companies)
Employees at Time of Investment
20-99 Employees(110 Companies)100-300Employees (107Companies)+301 Employees(160 Companies)
Sources: IFC’s management inormation systems, including DOTS
Figure 4: Fund returns and job creation are positively correlated
0%-50%10%-40%20%-30%30%-20%40%-10%50%Fund Net Internal Rate of Return (IRR)6543210y = 3.438x + 2.461R
2
= 0.264Ln jobs created
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more