Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Spirit Lake Sioux v NCAA

Spirit Lake Sioux v NCAA

Ratings: (0)|Views: 45 |Likes:
Published by religionclause

More info:

Published by: religionclause on May 03, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/03/2012

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONThe Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe of Indians, byand through its Committee of Understanding and Respect, and ArchieFool Bear, individually, and asRepresentative of more than 1004Petitioners of the Standing Rock SiouxTribe,Plaintiffs,vs.The National Collegiate AthleticAssociation,Defendant.))))))))))))))))Case No. 2:11-cv-95
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’SMOTION TO DISMISSINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF HOLDING
At the outset, it is important to note what the pending motion is not about. It is not about thewisdom of the NCAA’s policies. It is not about whether or not the “Fighting Sioux” nickname andlogo will remain employed by the University of North Dakota (“UND”). It is not about thecollateral consequences that UND might suffer if it continues to use the nickname and logo. Andit is most decidedly not about whether the Spirit Lake Tribe has been tethered to the Standing Rock Tribe by a settlement agreement that neither tribe was a party to. Rather this motion is narrowlydrawn to have the Court resolve two preliminary matters: (1) does the court have jurisdiction; and(2) if so, does the Committee have standing to bring these actions?Before the Court is the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (“NCAA”) motion todismiss the complaint filed by the plaintiffs, the Committee of Understanding and Respect, andArchie Fool Bear, individually and as representative of more than 1,004 petitioners from the1
Case 2:11-cv-00095-RRE-KKK Document 30 Filed 05/01/12 Page 1 of 23
 
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (the “Committee”) (Doc. #10). The Committee founds its complaint onboth diversity jurisdiction and federal question jurisdiction. The NCAA alleges numerous groundsfor dismissing the Committee’s complaint, including lack of standing, collateral estoppel, failure tomeet statutes of limitation, and failure to state any claim upon which relief may be granted. Becausecomplete diversity of citizenship does not exist in this case, diversity jurisdiction cannot beestablished, and provisions of North Dakota law and related procedural considerations such asstatutes of limitation are inapposite. Under the provisions of federal law pled in the complaintestablishing federal question jurisdiction, the Committee fails to raise a colorable claim that survivesthe NCAA’s motion to dismiss. Because no relief can legally be afforded under federal law as pledby the Committee, the NCAA’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
FACTS
The never-ending saga of the University of North Dakota’s “Fighting Sioux” nicknamecontroversy is tortuous and incapable of full explanation here. Spanning a spectrum of protestsfor and against the name, tribal resolutions, state laws, and fierce public debate, the NCAA’schampionship policy has created significant turmoil within the state of North Dakota over thepropriety of the continued use of the “Fighting Sioux” nickname. The facts presented here arelimited to those pertinent to this federal case, with such elaboration as is necessary to put thisruling in context.The NCAA is a private association of American universities and colleges whosemembers voluntarily compete for athletic championships in multiple sports. In 2005, the NCAAinstituted a new championship policy addressing the display of Native American nicknames,mascots, and imagery at events conducted under its governance. (Doc. #1-3). The policy2
Case 2:11-cv-00095-RRE-KKK Document 30 Filed 05/01/12 Page 2 of 23
 
prohibited all use of covered imagery at its events, including the use of uniforms, images, andany other references. (Id.) If a covered institution continues with an unapproved use of nicknames and imagery it suffers sanctions, including ineligibility for hosting NCAA playoff events and restrictions on the display of the banned imagery, including the use of the name,during those events.One of the members subject to sanctions under the championship policy is the Universityof North Dakota (“UND”) as a result of its “Fighting Sioux” nickname and logo. In October2007, after litigation over the NCAA policy, UND entered into a settlement agreement with theNCAA in which UND would be permitted to retain the “Fighting Sioux” nickname and imageryif it received written approval for their use from the Spirit Lake and Standing Rock Sioux Tribes.(Doc. #1-3). The Spirit Lake Sioux Reservation is located entirely within the state of NorthDakota, whereas the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation straddles the border between NorthDakota and South Dakota, but has its tribal headquarters in Fort Yates, North Dakota. The SpiritLake Tribe gave written approval to UND for the use of the “Fighting Sioux” nickname andimagery on October 1, 2009. (Doc. #1-25).The Standing Rock Tribe has never given its approval, and UND, through the NorthDakota State Board of Higher Education, made a decision to retire the “Fighting Sioux”nickname and logo by August 1, 2010. Recognizing the retirement of these marks, the StandingRock Tribal Council then passed a resolution declaring that “further discussion is not necessaryand will not be conducted as there are many issues of priority that need timely attention.” (Doc.#1-12).The Committee brought suit in state court in North Dakota seeking full enforcement of 3
Case 2:11-cv-00095-RRE-KKK Document 30 Filed 05/01/12 Page 3 of 23

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->