Coming to the defense of Occupy DC were Repre-sentatives Lacy Clay (D-Missouri), Elijah Cummings(D-Georgia), Danny Davis (D-Illinois), and EleanorHolmes Norton (D-DC). Cummings commented that, while there had been numerous committee hearingsunder Issa, now including Occupy DC, he was frus-trated that none had focused on robo-signing or thethousands who had their homes foreclosed due to thepractice. “It’s a damn shame,” Cummings said in re-sponse to the content of the hearing. “I wish we hadas much concern about the people who have lost their
houses ... it bafes me, it truly does ... I guess people
who are protesting and are part of Occupy, they look at a hearing like this and say this is why they occupy.’”Norton was disappointed that no one from eitherOccupy DC camp was allowed totestify at the hearing. Davis readthe First Amendment into the re-cord along with a statement ap-proved by the Occupy DC General Assembly. In it, Occupy DC statedthey were willing to work with theNPS to “to improve the health andsafety of our conditions.”The NPS representatives de-fended the rights of Occupy DC tomaintain a vigil in both FreedomPlaza and McPherson Square andstated that protesters had been“cooperative” and that “self-polic-ing” policies were working.Despite having their camps raid-ed, many occupiers are optimis-tic. Many of them seemed to havenowhere else to sleep, but foundplaces outside of the camp. Some occupiers from bothMcPherson Square and Freedom Plaza stayed at Lu-ther Place Memorial Church. Some refused to leavethe park altogether and continued to hold a vigil usingthe remaining tents.The occupiers plan to maintain a presence atMcPherson Square. Plans have been discussed at theGeneral Assembly to begin less picket and camp ori-ented protests. Many feel the need to focus on more
outreach-oriented actions, such as ghting against the
foreclosure of houses in communities in and aroundthe DC area. On top of this, plans for better communi-cation between different occupies, which would allow for larger coordinated actions to happen effectively, will also be discussed in future General Assemblies.
owt.occupydc.org
Contents~
NPS cracks down after Issa hearing..........................199% crash 99th Alfalfa Club gala.................................1DC actions take national focus in 2012.......................1Editorial.......................................................................2“Occupy the Dream” takes up King’s missionand demands action......................................3Kucinich talks shop with protesters...........................3McPherson Square montage....................................4-5Occupy Congress personal stories.............................6An open letter to occupiers everywhereAmanda, Occupy EatonCindy, Occupy GreensboroMcPherson Square personal stories.............................7Drew KathrynAmalHillary ACTA out!....................................................................8
Editors~
Jillian Blazek Andrew BreinerNatalie Camou(Photography)Michael CarboneBenjamin DanielsMichael GoldmanSiobhan McGuirk Karina Stenquist
Contact~
submissions@occupydc.org
Printing~
Doyle Printing & Offset5206 46th AvenueHyattsville, MD3000 copies
WashingtonTimes
THE OCCUPIED
Volume 2Issue 1
As we go to press for the rst time this year, we no
longer having a substantial presence in McPhersonSquare. Rumors of Occupy DC’s demise, however, areseverely exaggerated.On February 4, when National Park Service person-nel came to “inspect” our temporary home, occupiers
were compliant. Yet ofcers proceeded to remove the
majority of tents from the space, without issuing acourt-mandated, mandatory 24-hours notice.For the most part, Occupy DC has so far been sparedthe heinous treatment received by those with similargrievances in Oakland, Boston, New York, Davis, or
Berkeley. Yet the batons, tasers, mounted ofcers, and
plexiglass shields that have been wielded against usstill clearly demonstrate the increasing militarizationof law enforcement across the board.Mainstream media coverage has focused on violentconfrontation, neglecting much-needed, considereddebate of the issues Occupy emphasises and seeks toredress. In contrast, our coverage remains calm andresolute. We know that, no matter a publication’s ed-itorial line, the images distill the story: This is whatstate oppression looks like.On February 5 we, supporters of Occupy DC new and old, returned en masse. We did not go to reoc-cupy the public space, although that idea continuesto be discussed. We went to do what we do best: totalk, to listen, to share ideas and make plans for thefuture. The clock ticked over two hours before every-one already involved in active social justice orientedorganising had chance to speak. Announcement and invitations to get involved cov-ered a free learning collective, a faith outreach group,student solidarity, foreclosure and eviction resistance,criminal injustice response, homeless advocacy, radi-cal media production, and many more. We know what our readers have seen and heard else- where: The Occupy movement is aimless and feckless.In September, when camps started setting up acrossthe US, that was the easy headline, the comfortable,ubiquitous lie. Now, the powers that be are strugglingto keep up the pretense. Because the undeniable truthis that we are actively shifting political discourse to- wards addressing social inequality and injustice. We are agitating for change, by marching up to thedoors of Congress and demanding an audience withour representatives. We are building links with like-minded activists across the nation, and linking up with local, like-minded organizations. We turning new heads every day, and those who catch a glimpse arestarting to ask questions, too.Our aims could not be more clear: we stand against
the corrupt nancial institutions and decaying eco
-
nomic systems that exploit the many to prot the few. We ght against an entrenched two-party system that
compromises citizens’ voices in exchange for money-tary gain.
We also ght in solidarity against the rise of the in
-dustrial-prison complex; in support of affordable pub-lic housing initiatives; for medical care for those mostin need, forgotten and cast aside; to support veteransand active servicemembers; for voting rights for D.C.’s600,000 unrepresented inhabitants; and for a cultureshift away from the persistent patriarchal and raciststructures that divide and suppress us.In this issue we tell the story of our eviction fromMcPherson Sq. but we linger on our successes as amovement. We do so not to mourn what has passed, but to remind us of how much more we can achieve.
~
As the corporate media continues to take its cuesfrom private interests,
The Occupied WashingtonTimes
works to provide a platform for marginalized
voices. We need a broad base of support to fulll this
primary aim. We invite community organizations andindividual contributors to submit news items, opinionpieces, photographs, and action updates. We also hope that you will visit our website, where we regularly publish news, opinion and in-depth anal- ysis pieces. All print content will also be published on-line.Finally, you can also contribute towards
The Occu- pied Washington Times
by helping us cover our print-ing costs. We are a volunteer-run paper that does notrely on advertising revenue, and without the support we have already received from readers like you, this would not have been possible.
To donate, visit:http://www.occupydc.org/newspaper
-
The Occupied Washington Times
editorial team
Issa leans on NPS to evict Occupy DC
Continued from 1
Editorial~
(Pablo.Raw) Jan./Feb. 2012