5/5/12Gmail-
FW:
Kimberlin
v.
Allen
FW:Kimberlinv.Allen
BethKingsley
<
•••••••••••
To:"A.W."<aaronjw72@gmail.com>
From:
JusticeThroughMusic[mailto:
Sent:
Friday,December30,201112:10
PM
To:
BethKingsley;Rebecca
__
Subject:
FW:
Killberlil
v.Alen
DearBeth:
Mon,
Feb13,2012at10:01
AM
Nicechattingwithyou.Pleasedonotsendthisemail
to
Mr.Worthingbecause
he
will
post
it
on
theInternet
as
he
didwithmylegalcommunications
to
him.Ialso
wantto
mentionanotherpossibleconflict
of
interestotherthanyourrepresentation
of
ACORN.
As
noted,
my
organizationsand
my
businesspartnerBradFriedmanhavebeenveryinvolved
with
the
ACORN
issue,puttinguprewardswhen
their
officeswereattacked,urgingaccountability
for
James
O'Keefe
et
al
for
their
illegalwiretapping
of
ACORN
employees,havingBertha
on
BradFriedman'sradioprogram,writingdozens
of
articlesaboutthedestruction
of
ACORN,
andworkingwithmembers
of
CongressandtheCaliforniaAttorneyGeneral'soffice
to
get
to
thetruthabouttheattacks
onACORN.
Mr.Worthing
has
beenpart
ofthat
attackmachine,blogging
for
rightwing
ACORN
haterPatrick
Frey.
Infact,
it
wasBradFriedman'sexpose
ofthat
cabal
with
regard
to
ACORN
whichcausedthisattackmachine
tofirst
targethim,andthenme.
In
addition
to
this,VelvetRevolution,
an
organizationwhichIaminvolved,
has
acampaigncalledwww.StopTheChamber.com.whichexposesexcesses
of
theChamber
of
Commerce.WehaveworkedwithChamberWatch,aclientofyourpartnerGailHarmon,andIhavetalkedwithGailabouttheChamberandits
IRS
issues.Weinfactarepresentlyworking
with
the
FBI
in
an
investigation
of
theChamberandpreparedaWhitePaper
for
theBureauwhichincludes
as
an
exhibitthefiling
that
Gailand
Cyrus
Mehriprepared.One
of
ourBoardMembersalso
has
aconnection
to
Ms.Harmon,IbelievethroughFriends
of
theEarth.Iwill
be
happy
to
proVidehername
to
you
as
well
as
theWhitePaper
if
youneedthem
to
makeyourconflict
of
interestdetermination.TheChamber
of
Commercehiredmilitaryintelligencecontractors
to
attackour
https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=4cc57a020c&view=pt&q=bkingsley%40harmoncurran.com&qs=tr...
1f7
5/5/12Gmail-
FW:
Kimberlin
v.
Allen
group,ChamberWatch,and
me
personally
as
part
of
asixmilliondollarcampaign
of
destruction.
See
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8354AlthoughTeamThemiswasexposed,theChambercontinues
to
fundoperationsagainst
us
and
me,
andMr.Worthing
is
part
of
thecabal
that
theChamber
uses
for
itsnefariouspurposesalongwithotherssuch
as
thosecc'd
on
thedeaththreatemailfromMr.Allen
to
Mr.Worthing.WearepresentlyinconsultationwithcounselaboutfilingalawsuitagainsttheChamberet
al
for
theTeamThemiscampaign
of
destruction,
and
there
is
averyrealpossibility
that
Mr.Worthingwill
be
namedadefendantin
that
action,whichwillmostlikely
be
filedinfederalcourt.Finally,Iwant
to
memorializemyconcernaboutMr.Worthing'sviolations
of
the
Rules
of
ProfessionalResponsibility
and
thepossibility
that
thismayimpactyou
if
aCourtorBarfinds
that
yousomehowcontributed
to
thisunprofessionalconduct.Mr.Worthingenteredinto
an
attorneyclientrelationshipwith
Seth
Allenusingafalsename,and
is
tryingthiscase
on
theblogs,attacking
me
personallyand
as
aparty,andnowthreatening
to
presentcriminalcharges
to
obtain
an
advantageinacivilmatter,beingalawyerandawitness,using
his
blog
to
embarrass
me,
andmakingfalsestatementsabout
me.
See
relevantrulesbelow.Ibelieve
that
anyCourtorBarfacedwithacomplaintdetailingtheactions
of
Mr.Worthingtryingthiscaseinthepresswithvileattacks
on
me,willfind
that
his
conductviolatestheRules.IsubpoenaedMr.Worthinginacivilmatterandwasattackedmercilessly
on
his
blog,andin
his
tweets.
He
has
called
me
amurdersuspect,aterrorist,aperjurer,andurgedothers
to
attackme.
Hehas
called
me
outpersonally
onhis
blog,urgedreaders
to
getthepopcornbecause
he
was
going
to
destroy
me
and
it
will
be
funtowatch.http://allergic2bull.blogspot.com/2011/12/tune-intonight-at-ten-oclock-eastern.htmlThis
is
notconduct
that
is
allowed
byan
attorney.Abloggerwhodidthiscouldfaceadefamationsuit,butMr.Worthing
is
representinghimself
as
an
attorneywho
he
sayshad
an
attorneyclientrelationshipwithaparty
to
thislawsuit.Therefore,
he
is
bound
by
the
Rules
of
ProfessionalConduct.Iwill
be
seekingsanctionsagainsthim
for
violatingthe
Rules
now
that
he
has
giventheCourtjurisdictionoverhimbyfiling
his
motion.Mydilemmanow
is
whetheryoutoohaveviolatedthe
Rulesby
actinginasupervisorycapacity
to
him.
As
youknow,
Rules
5.1and5.2specificallyrequirebothsupervisoryandsubordinateattorneyscomplywiththeRules.Iurgeyou
to
discussthesematterswithothersinyourfirmand
get
back
to
me
nolaterthanTuesday,January3rd
as
to
theconflict
of
interestsandthe
Rules
violationssoIcandecidehow
to
proceedwithmysanctionsmotion.Beth,
as
notedinourcall,I
am
areasonableperson
and
Ididnotask
for
this
fight
andIdon'tevenblog.Iwant
to
be
left
alone.That'swhatJudgeJordantold
Seth
Allen
to
do,but
he
refused
to
complywith
that
orderorthepermanentinjunction.Mr.Worthing
has
eggedhim
on
andadvisedhimtoviolatetheorder.NowMr.Worthing
is
arguingfrivolously
that
theinjunction
is
taintedbecauseIamafelon.
Heis
urgingcriminalprosecution
of
me
for
what
he
frivolouslyargues
is
perjury.
He
chosethis
fight
and
he
willhavetoanswer
to
theCourtandtheBar
for
his
conduct.Maybe
he
has
aFirstAmendmentright
to
bloganonymously,but
he
does
nothaveaFirstAmendmentright
to
violatetheRules.
And
Idon'tbelieve
that
anyCourtor
Ba
rwillallowMr.Worthing
to
remainanonymous
after
violatingthe
Rules
soblatantly.Iamavictim
of
stalking.Ihaveafinal
Peace
Orderissued
by
ajudgeagainstMr.Allen
for
stalkinganddeaththreats.IhaveapermanentinjunctionagainstMr.Allenprohibitinghimfromdefaming
htlps://mail.google.com/maill?ui=2&ik=4cc57a020c&view=pt&q=bkingsley%40harmoncurran.com&qs=tr...
2fl
5/5/12Gmail-
FW:
Kimberlin
v.
Allen
open
refusalbased
on
anassertion
that
novalidobligation
exists;
•
•
(d)
in
pretrialprocedure
make
frivolousdiscovery
requests
or
fail
to
make
reasonablydiligent
efforts
to
complywith
legally
proper
discovery
requests
by
anopposing
party;
•
•
(e)
in
trial,allude
to
any
matterthat
thelawyer
does
not
reasonablybelieve
is
relevant
or
that
will
not
be
supported
byadmissibleevidence,
assert
personal
knowledge
of
facts
in
issue
except
when
testifyingasawitness,
or
state
apersonalopinionas
to
the
justness
of
acause,
the
credibility
of
aWitness,
the
culpability
of
acivillitigant
or
the
gUilt
or
innocence
of
anaccused;
or
•
•
(f)
request
a
person
other
than
aclient
to
refrain
from
voluntarilygiving
relevant
information
to
anotherparty
unless:
o
o
(1)
the
person
is
arelative
or
an
employee
or
other
agent
of
aclient;and
o
o
(2)
the
lawyer
reasonablybelieves
that
the
person's
interests
will
not
beadverselyaffectedbyrefraining
from
givingsuch
information.
•
•
(g)
present,participate
in
presenting,
or
threaten
to
present
criminalcharges
to
obtainan
improper
advantage
in
acivil
matter.
•
Rule
3.5
ImpartialityandDecorum
of
theTribunal<http://www.law.comell.edu/ethics/md/code/MDCODE.HTM#tribunal>
(a)
Alawyershall
not:
(1)
seek
to
influencea
judge,
prospective,qualified,
or
sworn
juror,
or
other
officialby
means
prohibited
by
law;(2)
before
thetrial
of
a
case
with
whichthelawyer
is
connected,
communicate
outside
thecourse
of
officialproceedings
with
anyone
known
to
thelawyer
to
beonthe
jury
list
fo
r
trial
0
fthecase;(3)duringthetrial
of
a
case
with
whichthelawyer
is
connected,
communicateoutsidethecourse
of
officialproceedings
with
any
member
of
the
jury;
(4)
duringthetrial
of
a
case
with
whichthelawyer
is
not
connected,
communicateoutsidethecourse
of
officialproceedings
with
any
member
of
the
jury
about
thecase;(5)
after
discharge
of
ajury
fromfurther
consideration
of
a
case
with
whichthelawyer
is
connected,
askquestions
of
or
make
comments
to
ajury
memberthat
arecalculated
to
harass
or
embarrassthe
jury
member
or
to
influencethe
jury
member'sactionsin
future
jury
service;(6)
conduct
a
vexatious
or
harassinginvestigation
of
any
prospective,
qualified,
or
sworn
juror;
(7)communicate
ex
parte
about
an
adversary
proceeding
with
the
judge
or
other
official
beforewhom
the
proceeding
is
pending,
except
as
permitted
by
law;(8)discuss
with
ajudge
potentialemployment
of
the
judge
if
thelawyer
or
a
firm
<http:llwww.law.comell.edu/ethics/md/code/MDCODE.HTM#firm>
with
whichthelawyer
is
associated
has
a
matter
that
is
pending
before
the
judge;
or
(9)engagein
conduct
intended
todisrupt
a
tribunal
<http://www.law.comell.edu/
ethics/md
Icode
IMD
CODE.HTM#tribunal>.(b)Alawyer
who
has
knowledge
of
any
violation
of
paragraph
(a)
of
thisRule,any
https:/Imail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=4cc57a020c&view=pt&q=bkingsley%40harmoncurran.com&qs=tr...4/7
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Email From Brett Kimberlin to Beth Kingsley 12.30.11 (OCR)
Email sent from Brett Kimberlin to Beth Kingsley, December 30, 2011. Please note that Kimberlin makes numerous false allegations that were addressed in detail at http://allergic2bull.blogspot.com/2012/01/bret-kimberlin-convicted-terrorist-and.html
722
Reads
0
Readcasts
2
Embed Views
Get Scribd Mobile
To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
We'll never share your phone number.
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
