Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
14Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
HSBC, et al vs Jodi Matt - Amicus Curiae of Robert P. Marley

HSBC, et al vs Jodi Matt - Amicus Curiae of Robert P. Marley

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,006 |Likes:
Published by chunga85
"If there was no timely assignment to the Trustee within the proscribed period as set forth above, there can never be one."

Bob the builder didn't build a better mouse-trap; but he explains how it was built...and how they are trapped.
"If there was no timely assignment to the Trustee within the proscribed period as set forth above, there can never be one."

Bob the builder didn't build a better mouse-trap; but he explains how it was built...and how they are trapped.

More info:

Published by: chunga85 on May 07, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/14/2013

pdf

text

original

 
i
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTSSUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
_____________________NO. SJC-11101________________________________HSBC BANK USA, N.A. & ACE SECURITIES CORP.HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST SERIES 2005-HE4Plaintiff-Appellee,V.JODI B. MATTDefendant-Appellant,_________________________________ON APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF FINALJUDGMENT FROM THE LAND COURT________________________________________AMICUS CURIAE OF ROBERT P. MARLEY______________________________________________Robert P. Marley
Pro-se
 18 Lakeview DriveLynnfield, MA 01940781-844-3044Marley0685@comcast.net March 6, 2012
 
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
 
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
………………………………
.
iii, iv, v & viII.
 
STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE
…………………………
1III.
 
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
……………………………………………….…..
.
.…2
 IV.
 
ARGUMENT
…………………………………………………………………….…………………………….…2
 A)
 
Examination Of Standing Begins And HingesAt The Trust Level and Standing Can Only
Derive from the Trust Instrument’s………………………
7V.
 
A BASIC TENANT OF LAW REQUIRES THATTHE PROPER PARTIES ARE BEFORE A COURT OF LAW,JURISDICTIONALLY AND SUBSTANTIVELY
……………………………….
14VI.
 
THE APPELLEE TRUST HAS NO STANDING TO BRING ANACTION UNDER THE SERVICEMEMBERS ACTBECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN NO VALID ENFORCEABLEASSIGNMENT TO THE TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST
…………………….
16A)
 
The Appellee Trust Is A New York CommonLaw Trust Controlled By New York Law Basedon Its Trust
Instrument’s………………………………………….
16B)
 
The Trust Instrument’s
Sets Forth AnUnambiguous Time, Method And Manner OfFunding The Trust
……………………………………………………………….
21VII.
 
THE TRUST AGREEMENT PROVIDES THE ONLY MANNERIN WHICH ASSETS MAY BE PROPERLY TRANSFERRED TOTHE TRUST AND ANY ACT IN CONTRAVENTION OF THETRUST AGREEMENT IS VOID
…………………………………………………………….
23A)
 
Transfer Of Assets To The Trust MustBe Pursuant To The Tru
st Instrument’s……………
23B)
 
New York Law Governs the MandatoryObligations To Effectively Transfer AnAsset To A Trust
………………………………………………………………….
28
 
iii
I.
 
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES MASSACHUSETTS CASES
Bello v. South Shore Hospital,384 Mass. 770, 778 (1981)
…………………………………………………………………….
15285 Lynn Shore Drive Condominium Trust v. AUTOMATICSPRINKLER APPEALS BOARD,47 Mass. App. Ct. 437, 441 (1999)
…………………………………………………
14Ginther v. Commissioner of Insurance,427 Mass. 319, 322 (1998
)…………………………………………………………………….
15US Bank National Association v. Ibanez,458 Mass. 637 (2011
)………………………………………………………………………………….39
 
 NEW YORK CASES
AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v. State St. Bank & TrustCo.,2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 5766, 7 (N.Y. 2008)
………………………………….
33Allison & Ver Valen Co. v. McNee,170 Misc.
144, 146 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1939)……………………………….
40Brown v. Spohr,180 N.Y. 201, 73 N.E. 14, 17 (1904)
…………………………
4, passimBurgoyne v. James,282 N.Y.S. 18, 21 (1935)
……………………………………………………………………….
29Corp. v. Bankers Trust Co.,151 Misc. 2d
334, 336 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1991)…………………………
24Green v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.,223 A.D. 12, 227 N.Y.S. 252 (1st Dept.
), aff’d, 248N.Y. 627 (1928)……………………………………………………………………………………………….
33Gruen v. Gruen,68 N.Y.2d 48, 56 (N.Y. 1986)
…………………………………………………………….
30

Activity (14)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
chunga85 liked this
vharrison_3 liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
chunga85 liked this
chunga85 liked this
chunga85 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->