You are on page 1of 101
REPORT IN COMPLIANCE TO THE ORDER DTD 12.09.2011 OF THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT | | OF INDIA | "IN THE COMPLAINT DTD. 08.06.2006 OF | SMT. JAKIA NASIM AHESAN JAFRI Volume — Il (Pages 271:to 541) afer otaon ed mor en tind and the Ste eared rueively ein fea, mates ithe fet carpe desined fom 198 tah to. 10000, al board examinations lng (UPS cams) were eld wth nomal atendanc, panchayat elon in reaty1700.ilages hel witout any maior incerta Hs ai tom State numbering abut 6000 went back stl th ilegoe tnd. at reigour fontaine Galf-Yor, Mahe-Srhra Monarum, Poonam Mala. at Ariba! and Ure at Bhatia’ i Durgen wore hel pancafly, Shit Subba Rao hee for sata that boned ont sere scat: Kv: uted 6 the Eiecion Commission that the Sate Adniiaaton wae roa 1 discarge any lack wich right be errunted fo Fr, Shi Ashok Narayan, the then ACS (Home) has ated tat he Home Deparment was rt arwcus thet the election should bo held that tim, but essutp the Election Commieson tat gien the racobean etch otce fom the Cantal Gov, Law & One? stun would be Huirtained snd enol of wor enaurad, in Assembly Constituencies out of 182 were tected by the Communal riots was arrived at by applying yardsticks, which were determined by the Govt. in Revenue Department in relation to distribution of foodgrains and other items of relief, Shri Ashok Narayan is of the view that these yardsticks were understandably liberal and that the actual number of constituencies affected by the communal riots in the context of the Law & Order situation relevant to holding of election ,were less, Last but not the least, their contention that the very fact that the. elections were held in December, 2002 and the event passed off peacefully vindicates their stand and the same can not be rebutted by the arguments put forward by Shri Sreekumar. The allegation is, therefore, not established 2AL © Speech on the oceasion of Gaurav Yatra: As regards the public speech delivered at Bechara], Mehsana District on 09-09-2002, as a part of Gaurav Yatra, Shri Narendra Modi has explained that the speech did not refer to any particular community or religion. According to Shri Modi, this was @ political speech in which he has pointed out the increasing population of India and had remarked that “can't Gujarat implement family planning?” Shri Narendra Modi has claimed that his speech has been distorted by some interested elements, who had misinterpreted the same to suit their designs. He has also stated that there were no rlots or tension after his election speech. No criminality has come on record in respect of this aspect of allegation. © Contact with controversial personalities Shri Narendra Modi has denied using the mobile phones of his personal staff at headquarters. He was allotted a mobile phone in the year 2002, but he rarely used the same, as landlines were recollect: any name or incident, when CM talked over his mobile not and that he had never seen EM talking to any one over his am

You might also like