Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Analysis of AL

Analysis of AL

Ratings:

4.0

(1)
|Views: 140 |Likes:
Published by Hierophage

More info:

Published by: Hierophage on Dec 23, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/28/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Analysis of A.C.’s“First Sketch of Qabalistic Key to AL”
Column I
Statement 1:
 
X
םיהלא
3.14593 =
π
to 6 places
Proof:
Unknown.
 
 The use of the Solar/Lunar./Masc./Fem. glyph (hereafter calledthe HG glyph or glyph of the “Hieros Gamos”) may be pointing to the fact thatELOHIM is a masculine root with both a feminine and a plural ending or mightpossibly be referring to the letter Kaph (20/500; as below). Elohim enumerates to 86or 646 (with M Final)(1+30+5+10+40/600). Uncertain as to how this relates to Pi.
Using Aiq Beker the values reduce to 1, 3, 5, 1 & 4. Then, using Temurah, one may arrive at 31145 with one of the 1’s [Yod] representing a point since it is often associated with the spermatozoon. 3.145. The addition of 93 relates to the marriage of Sun and Moon through “love under 
 
will” 
Θεληµα & Αγαπη 
 ].
If this is the case, and I certainly hope it isn’t, then it is a very flimsy one and not worthy of being included as proof of the praeterhuman origins of CCXX.
 )
Statement 2:
דאה
 
= HAD = 11 = in full = 555 = 5 energy.
Proof:
Partially incorrect.
דאה
)
5+1+4) is 10 not 11 as stated. In fullindicatesthe three letters spelled out. HH (10), ALP (111), DLTh (434) = 555. “Energy”might indicate Crowley’s usage of Aleph to represent the energy of the Pentagram asin CCCXXXIII, Commentary on “Sabbath of the Goat” and hence 5 X 111= 555.
Statement 3:
 
אל
=
31
.
לא
=
31.
Proof:
Correct. Aleph = 1; Lamed = 30.
Statement 4:
 
X
 
=
σ
 
(=6) = XX + XI = 31.
Proof:
Partially unknown, partially correct.
 
 The HG glyph repeats again showing theunion between Sun and Moon, Masc. & Fem. The relation to Sigma is unclear andSigma’s relation to the number 6 even more so. The lower case Sigma physically looks like a 6 and isopsephically reduces to 6 (from 600). Also the number 6 isgenerally associated with the Hexagram, which, aside from its association with theplanets is also a glyph of Union between oppositional qualities (vide CCCXXXIII,Ch. XXXVI, LXIX). Another possibility is that the Greek Sigma can be equivalentto the Hebrew 
ס
 
 which corresponds to the Art card itself a glyph of Union betweenoppositional elements. Samekh also is the letter associated with the Navitah thatlinks the Sephiroth Tiphareth with Yesod. The Roman numerals relate to the ATU, here being The Aeon (Shin – possibly )and Lust (Union of Solar and Lunar, Masc. and Fem.)
 
Statement 5:
 
טש
=309 = XX+XI.
Proof:
Correct. Shin (300) + Teth (9) = 309. Shin relates to the Aeon card (XX) and Teth to the Lust card (XI). Check further connection between 309 & 31.
Statement 6:
 
ונ
 
= NU = 56.
Proof:
Correct. Nun (50) + Vav (6) = 56.
Statement 7:
161 COPH NIA
ףכ
=
100
+
ןיא
=
61.
Proof:
Correct. Kaph (20) + Pe (80) = 100; Aleph (1) + Yod (10) + Nun (50) = 61.Crowley’s addition is interesting here. In spelling the words he uses the Hebrew finalforms but in calculating the gematria he uses the initial value, a practice repeatedthroughout his career as a magician. Also, of interest is the fact that he spelled Kaphproperly, from right to left, but NIA is spelled as AIN (the Kabbalistic concept of “Nothing” [see Proof for Statement 8]).
Statement 8:
 
ףכ
= Kaph in full =
!
+
"
in Greek. See I 46-47.
Proof:
Correct. Kaph if directly transliterated into Greek gives us
 
ΚΦ
.
Crowley translated these two Greek letters throughout his life as being initials for
Κτεισ
and
Φαλλοσ
and thus representative of the Sun (as Phallus) and Moon (as Kteis) inunion. Chapter I verses 46 & 47 of CCXX discuss the number 80 which is Kaphspelled using initial Hebrew values:
AL I, 46:
"Nothing is a secret key of this law. Sixty-one the Jews call it; I call it eight, eighty, four hundred & eighteen."
The Old Comment
46. 61 =
nva
. But the True Nothing of Nuit is 8, 80, 418. Now 8is
c
, which spelt fully is 418 -
tic
. And 418 is Abrahadabra, the word of Ra-Hoor-Khuit. Now 80 is
p
, the letter of Ra-Hoor-Khuit. (Qy. this?) (Could 80 =
0. Infinity x Zero?)
AL I, 47:
"But they have the half: unite by thine art so that all disappear."
The Old Comment
47. Let us, however, add the Jewish half, 61.
8 + 80 + 418 = 506. Cf. Verses 24, 25.506 + 61 = 567 = 27 x 21 = ?
 
But writing 506 qabalistically backwards we get 605, and 605 + 61= 666.666 = 6 x 111, and 11 =
a
= 0 in Taro.666 = 1 + 2 + ... 36, the sum of the numbers in the Magic Squareof Sol.666 = the Number of the Beast.Or, taking the keys, 8, 80, 418, we get VII, XVI, VII, adding to 30.30 + 61 = 91 =
nma
, Amen. This may unite Nuit with Amoun the negative and concealed. Yetto my mind, she is the greater conception, that of which Amoun isbut a reflection.
Statement 9:
 AIWASS AIVAS = 78 (666’s error).
Proof:
Correct. A (1) + I (10) + V (6) + A (1) + S (60) = 78. The basis of the error was discovered later through the assistance of a Mr. Samuel Jacobs in 1917 as relatedmost recently in Oriflamme # 2: “The Revival of Magick and Other Essays”;
זויע
 
= OIVZ = 93 &
 
ΑΙ
 F 
ΑΣΣ
= 418.
MTP, App. III, “Notes for an Astral Atlas”: “AIWAZ itself addsto 93. (
This numeration was discovered years later. Thequestion then arose out of consideration of this discoverythrough S. Jacobs: "Why is Aiwaz spelt Aiwass, not Aiwaz, inthe Book of the Law?" In Greek [ 
Αιφασ
 ] Aifass = 418. Theauthor of the Book had concealed in His own name not oneonly but two numbers, those of supreme importance in the Book.)” 
CCXX, I, 7, New Comment:
 Why is Aiwass thus spelt, when Aiwaz is the natural transliteration of OIVZ? Perhaps because he was not content with identifying Himself with Thelema, Agape, etc.by the number 93, but wished to express his nature by six letters(Six being the number of the Sun, the God-Man, etc.) whose valuein Greek should be A=1,
Ι
=10,
Φ
=6,
Α
=1,
Σ
=200,
Σ
=200: total418, the number of Abrahadabra, the Magical Formula of the new  Aeon! Note that I and V are the letters of the Father and the Son,also of the Virgin and the Bull, (See ‘Liber 418’) protected on eitherside by the letter of AIR, and followed by the letter of Fire twiceover.”
[See statement and Proof 21 - MaL] 
Statement 10:
TA-NISH TANICh = 78 alternatively.
Proof:
Incorrect. This can only be true if the “A” (Aleph) is replaced by an “H” (Hé)and therefore be THNICh.
חונהט

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Alex Ferreira liked this
galaxy5111 liked this
deameon1427 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->