Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Initial Brief - Correra v. US Bank

Initial Brief - Correra v. US Bank

Ratings: (0)|Views: 59|Likes:
Published by winstons2311
It discusses what’s necessary to re-establish a lost note under Fla. Stat. 673.3091 and the procedure for setting trial under Rule 1.440. There’s also a lengthy discussion about why this plaintiff should suffer an adverse judgment, as opposed to getting a new trial, given the unconscionable fact-pattern with which we have all become far too accustomed in foreclosure-world (nearly five years of delays in prosecution by the plaintiff despite going against a pro se homeowner, numerous continuances given for the bank despite its apathetic prosecution of its own case, and the judge sua sponte prosecuting the case and helping the plaintiff along, etc.).
It discusses what’s necessary to re-establish a lost note under Fla. Stat. 673.3091 and the procedure for setting trial under Rule 1.440. There’s also a lengthy discussion about why this plaintiff should suffer an adverse judgment, as opposed to getting a new trial, given the unconscionable fact-pattern with which we have all become far too accustomed in foreclosure-world (nearly five years of delays in prosecution by the plaintiff despite going against a pro se homeowner, numerous continuances given for the bank despite its apathetic prosecution of its own case, and the judge sua sponte prosecuting the case and helping the plaintiff along, etc.).

More info:

Published by: winstons2311 on May 12, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/24/2013

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALIN AND FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDATAMARA S. CORREA,Appellant,Case No.: 2D12-2209v.L.T. No.: 2007-CA-014072U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,AS TRUSTEE FOR BACF 2006-D, andJIMMY CORREA,Appellee.____________________________________/ ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURTOF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUITIN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA__________________________________________________________________APPELLANTS INITIAL BRIEF______________________________________________________________________________________________Mark P. Stopa, EsquireFBN: 550507Philip Healy, EsquireFBN: 71953
S
TOPA
L
AW
F
IRM
 
2202 N. Westshore Blvd.Suite 200Tampa, FL 33607(727) 851-9551ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CITATIONS ............................................................................. iiiSTATEMENT OF THE CASE .................................................................... 1SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................................................... 10ARGUMENT............................................................................................... 12I. THE LOWER COURT REVERSIBLY ERRED WHEN ITENTERED A FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE ................ 13A.
 
U.S. Bank presented none of the evidence necessary tore-establish a lost note. 13B.
 
The Notice of Non Jury Trial was not signed by the Courtand gave Correa less than 30 days notice of trial. 23CONCLUSION ........................................................................................... 25CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ..................................................................... 26CERTIFICATE OF FONT COMPLIANCE ................................................ 26
 
 
TABLE OF CITATIONS
Andrews v. Direct Mail Express, Inc.,1 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).................................................... 12Asbury v. State,765 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) .................................................. 22Banco Espirito Santo, Ltd. v. BBO Intl, B.V.,979 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ................................................. 12Bayley Prods., Inc. v. Cole,720 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) .................................................. 19Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc.,492 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (
en banc
) .................................. 22Blackpool Assocs., Ltd. v. SM-106, Ltd.,839 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) .................................................. 22Blanton v. Baltuskouis,20 So. 3d 881 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).................................................... 20Church of Scientology v. Blackman,446 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) .................................................. 20Emerald Plaza West v. Salter,466 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) ................................................. 14Evans v. State,831 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) .................................................. 22Gee v. U.S. Bank, N.A.,72 So. 3d 211 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) ..................................................... 14Gerlach v. Trepanier,440 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).................................................... 20

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
Ren liked this
packagingwiz liked this
packagingwiz liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->