Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
ADAP Watch Update - 5.11.12

ADAP Watch Update - 5.11.12

Ratings: (0)|Views: 121 |Likes:
Published by housingworks

More info:

Published by: housingworks on May 14, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/14/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
ADAPs with Waiting Lists(2,759 individuals in 10 states*, as of May 10, 2012)
StateNumber of Individuals on ADAPWaiting ListPercent of the TotalADAP Waiting ListIncrease/Decrease fromPrevious ReportingPeriodDate WaitingList BeganAlabama
41 1% 9 April 2012
Florida
444 16% 96 June 2010
Georgia
851 31% -16 July 2010
Idaho
13 0.4% 2 February 2011
Louisiana**
284 10% 0 June 2010
Montana
3 0.1% -1 January 2008
Nebraska
230 8% -1 October 2011
North Carolina
169 6% 11 January 2010
Utah
0 0% 0 May 2011
Virginia
724 26% -45 November 2010
*As a result of FY2011 ADAP emergency funding, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, NorthCarolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia were able to reduce the overall number of individuals on their waitinglists.**Louisiana has a capped enrollment on their program. This number represents their current unmet need.
ADAPs with Other Cost-containment Strategies: Financial Eligibility(instituted since September 2009, as of April 19, 2012)
Six ADAPs have previously lowered their financial eligibility as part of their cost-containment planssince September 2009. Illinois, North Dakota, Ohio and South Carolina lowered their eligibility level to300 % FPL. Utah lowered their eligibility level to 250% FPL, and Arkansas lowered their eligibility levelto 200% FPL. Previously, all states had FPLs of 400% and above. As a result of these measures, a totalof 445 individuals in three states, Arkansas (99), Ohio (257), and Utah (89), were disenrolled. Illinois,North Dakota, and South Carolina grandfathered their clients that fell within the income levels intotheir programs. No other ADAPs currently anticipate further changes to their financial eligibility.
 
May 11, 2012

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->