Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
05/11/201215:35
MARSHALLDAVISBROWN
PAGE02/10
R.B.
AND
M.G.B.
HARRISCOUNTY,TEXASINTHEMATTEROF
OFTHEMARRIAGEOF
§§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§§
INTHEDISTRICTCOURTOFANDINTHEINTERESTOF
R.B.ANDM,.,B.,
MINORCHILDREN309
111
JUDIClALDISTRTCT
BESPONSEIO"RESfQNDENI'iANDTHlRJ)PARTIE§!
WlIION
FORSANCTIONS"
ANDCOUNTER-MOtIONFOR§,ANCTIONS.
COMESNOW,Petitioner,
R.
B.,byandthroughtheundersignedand!who
onhis
own
behalffiles
this"ResponseTo'Respondent!s
And
Third
Parties'MotionForSanctions'And.Counter-MotionForSanctions"and
in
supportthereofwouldshow
asfollows:
1.
Movantsseektosanctiontheundersigned
for"extreme,outrageous,a.~dsexual-inappropriate
statements"made
by
himrelativetoattorneysforM.O.B.
or
entities
inwhichheownsan
interest
who
happen
to
befemale
in
genderclaimingstatementsmade
by
the
undersigned"gofar
beyond
the'typical'opposing-attorney
banter."
2.Movantsseekcourtsanctionsresultingfromspeechutteredneitherinacourtroomnorduringcourtproceedings.TherequestedsanctionsareindirectviolationofU.S.Constitution,Amendment1andtheTexasConstitution.3.AttorneyHildermisstatesmostofthe
facts
inthe"factual
background"
portionofhismotion,to
wit:
a.Theundersignedhasnever
referred
toanyofDr.Brown'sfemale
attorneysas"flatchested"or"cunt"totheirface,
if
indeedsuchwordswere
conveyedtothem
it
was
doneso
by
recitationsviatheirmaleco-counsel;
Page1of5
20'11-(11272
 
05/11/201215:35713%1l20g
MARSHALLDAVISBROWN
PAGE03/10
b.Theonlytimetheundersignedsaid"dumb
shit"
directlytoafemaleattorneyforM.O.B.!namelyJeanneMclfowell,was
after
shehadaddressedtheundersignedinacondescendingandoffensivemannerrelatingtothe,at
that
time,outstandingbalanceoffeesandcostsowedR.B.(anamountin
excessof
$800,000).
Theundersignedreplied
in
anequally
condescending
mannerandreferred
to
her
as"dear."When
she
objected,
theundersigned
asked
her
if
she
"likeddumbshit
any
better."
Page
2
ofS
2011·01272
c.OnMarch30,201.2,attorneysand/oragents
forM.G.B.
interfered
with
adeponent
from
appearingforhisdepositioninMiami.
TheundersignedaskedPhilipHilderwhenheappearedatthehotelinMiamiwithanimmodestlydressedwoman
to
whomtheundersignedhadnotbeenintroduced,
if
suchimmodestlyattiredwoman
was
anemployeeofanescortserviceand,
if
so,wasriot
10:30
a.m.ona
Friday
morninga
bit
earlyforhimtobeinsuchcompany.
It
wasonlythenthatHilderrevealedtheidentityofthewomanas
that
of
Mary
OlgaLovett,anattorneyattheGreenbergTraurig
firm,
Further,
it
wasPhilipHilderwho
embarrassedsaid
Mary
OlgaLovettin
frontof
aroomfullofpeople,
if
indeedshewasembarrassed,
by
tellingherthattheundersigned'smistake.
d.WhenattorneysforM.G.B.andhis
entitiescomplained
about
discoverycostsrelatedto
return.
travelto
Miami
toinvestigatethepropertiesandmoniesthathehadstashedthereinviolationoftheAgreedTemporaryOrdersherein,theundersignedsuggested
with
evidentsarcasmthathewouldbehappyto
share
aroomwith
any
ofM.O.B.'scounselonthenexttrip,evenwithRobertC.
Kuehm.
e.Ifindeedafemaleattorneyheardthewords"bitch"and"Daddylike..."
in
referencetooneofthem,saidverbiagewasconveyedbyRobertC.KuehmassuchstatementswerethecontentsofaprivatetextsenttoKuehmsuggestingthathe
was
about
to
befired
by
M.G.B..
Thereferencedtext
was
sent
to
Kuehrnwhilehewaspresentinthe333
m
duringahearing
with
oneofM.G.B.'snewlawyersand
was
at
atimeafterKuehmhadmadedisrespectfulstatementsaboutLindaGloveroftheWinsteadfinnwhowastheopposing
counsel.
inthe333
fd
hearing.
4.TheCourtwillnotbesurprisedthatNONEOFTHEUNDERL
YINa
FACTSOF
TIlECASELAW
SUBMITIEDBY
LAWYERHilderisevenremotelyrelatedtoallegedactionsofthe
undersigned
and,moreimportantly,noneofthecasesrelatetoconstitutionallyprotectedextrajudicialspeech.
 
05/11/201215:357139511209
MARSHALLDAVISBROWN
PAGE04/10
5.It
is
certainthattheattorneysforM.O.B.andhisentitieswilltakecomfort
in
the
lawsofour
stateprotecting
such
speech
as
attorney
RobertC.KuehmhasdonethefollowingduringhisbriefrepresentationofM.O.B.:a.Calling
R.
B.a"crackho;"
Page3of5
2011·01272
b.
Referringto
R.
B.es"B'sbitch;"c.Stating
that
heandJeanne
McDowell
were
hiredbyM.G.S;
becauseofthepreferentialtreatmenttheywouldreceivefromthisCourt;
d.
Askingadrugtest
technician
todescribetheappearanceofR.B.'spubichairforhiminthehallofthecourthouse.
e.
Telling
"back
inthe
day"
storiesof"havingfunwith
court
reportersaftertakingadepositionorfollowingatrial;'inthepresenceofwomen;andg.Making
comments
comparing
hls
owngenitalia
tothat
ofa
black
co-workerduringhistimeworkingforrailroads.'
6.Texascourtsdohave"inherent
power"
to
impose
sanctionsnot
grantedacourt
by
aspecific
statute
orrule.
Ezeok«v.
Tracy,
349S.W.3d679(Tex.App.-Houston[14th
Dist.]
2011;
no
pet.);
Kutchv,DelMar
Coll.,
831S.W.2d506(Tex.App...CorpusChristi1992,
no
pet.),
However,for
a
courttoexercise
thisInherent
power,
theconductcomplained
aboutmustsignificantlyinterferewith
the
court's
legitimateexerciseofoneofitscore
fuutions
(e.g.,
hearingevidence,
deciding
bisues
of
fad
orquestionof
law.
EzeQkeKutch;Kennedyv.Kennedy,
125S.W.3d.,14
(Tex.
App.-Atutitt2002,
pet.
denied)
7.AttorneyHilder'srequests
forsanctions,inall
likelihood;
anattempttoregain:
faceafter
the
Discovery
Master
in
thismatter
partially
grantedthe
discovery
sanctionsrequestedagainstM.O.B.requiringhim
to
deposit
$750.000.00
intotheregistryoftheCourt.Duringthat
hearing,
attorneyHilderutteredspeechthattendedto"mteIfere
with
th.ekQ1lU's,..Je..citimlili<
exerciseofits
rl0wer
in
dec.idingissuesoffactor
questionoflaw"
when
Hilder
attemptedto
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
    • Notes
    Load more