Professional Documents
Culture Documents
08-694
In The
Supreme Court of the United States
-------------------------- ♦ --------------------------
v.
RAMBUS INCORPORATED,
Respondent.
-------------------------- ♦ --------------------------
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
-------------------------- ♦ --------------------------
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF
ADVANCED MEDIA WORKFLOW ASSOCIATION (AMWA); CONSUMER
ELECTRONICS ASSOCIATION (CEA); GLOBALPLATFORM INC.; IMS
GLOBAL LEARNING CONSORTIUM, INC. (IMS); INTERNATIONAL
IMAGING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, INC. (I3A); IPC, ASSOCIATION
CONNECTING ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES; LINUX FOUNDATION;
MIDI MANUFACTURES ASSOCIATION; MOBILE PRINTING AND
IMAGING CONSORTIUM, INC.; OPEN GEOSPATIAL CONSORTIUM,
INC. (OGC); OPENSAF FOUNDATION; ORGANIZATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF STRUCTURED INFORMATION STANDARDS
(OASIS); PICMG-PCI INDUSTRIAL COMPUTER MANUFACTURERS
GROUP, INC. (PICMG); SOCIETY OF MOTION PICTURE AND
TELEVISION ENGINEERS (SMPTE); THE OPEN GROUP (TOG); THE
SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FORUM, INC.; VIDEO ELECTRONICS
STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (VESA); VMEBUS INTERNATIONAL
TRADE ASSOCIATION (VITA); XBRL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
-------------------------- ♦ -------------------------
Andrew Updegrove
Counsel of Record
GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP
40 Broad Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
(617) 350-6800
THE LEX GROUPDC ♦ 1750 K Street N.W. ♦ Suite 475 ♦ Washington, DC 20006
(202) 955-0001 ♦ (800) 815-3791 ♦ Fax: (202) 955-0022 ♦www.thelexgroupdc.com
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ARGUMENT............................................................. 10
B. Absent a Justifiable
Presumption of Trust,
Stakeholders have More to
Lose than to Gain by
Participating in Standards
Development ............................. 24
CONCLUSION ......................................................... 28
iii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page(s)
CASES
OTHER
1
The following statement is made in accordance with Sup. Ct.
R. 37.6: No part of this brief was authored by counsel for any
party and no monetary contributions were made by any person
or entity for the preparation or submission of this brief, other
than printing fees contributed by certain of the amici curiae. It
has been filed on a pro bono basis by Gesmer Updegrove LLP,
which represents many standard setting and promotional SSOs
on an ongoing basis, including thirteen amici curiae. Counsel of
Record has been notified within 10 days. Letters of consent
from both parties have been filed with the Clerk of this Court.
2
ARGUMENT
Fact_Sheet_Innovation_and_Technology.pdf. More
specifically, the President Elect has promised to
name the first government-wide Chief Technology
Officer.
2
The classic example is the commercial war which raged
between two competing, patented, video designs: JVC’s VHS
format and Sony’s Betamax format. This failure by industry to
agree on a common standard ultimately left millions of
consumers with Betamax video players for which new
videotapes could not be rented after the VHS format achieved
supremacy. See ConsortiumInfo.org, What (and Why) is an
SSO? (2003), available at http://www.
consortiuminfo.org/essentialguide/whatisansso.php.
27
CONCLUSION
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Andrew Updegrove, Esq.
Counsel of Record
GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP
40 Broad Street
Boston, MA 02109