Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
7Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Bioinitiative Report on Health effects of EMF, ELF, radio frequency

Bioinitiative Report on Health effects of EMF, ELF, radio frequency

Ratings:

5.0

(2)
|Views: 740 |Likes:
Published by BioElectricShield
A major new report on EMF (electromagnetic fields), the BioInitiative Report, has been produced and published by David Carpenter and Cindy Sage. Lou Slesin, editor of the authoritative Microwave News website, greeted it this way: August 29... An international group of researchers has thrown down the gauntlet. The BioInitiative Working Group is challenging the EMF power structure to set much stricter exposure standards for power lines, cell phones, cell towers and other sources of electromagnetic radiation. "'Business as usual' is unacceptable," says David Carpenter, the director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at New York's University of Albany, on releasing the working group's extensive report. Its general conclusion is that there are many biological effects at levels that are well below current standards and that the "existing safety limits are inadequate to protect public health." Carpenter and Cindy Sage, a consultant based in Santa Barbara, California, coordinated the BioInitiative group and edited the report.
Among the group's key recommendations are:
a 1mG limit for homes where children and/or pregnant women live;
a "precautionary limit" of 0.1μW/cm² (0.6V/m) for RF exposures where "people live, work and go to school."

These proposed levels are on the order of 1,000 times more stringent than current limits adopted by ICNIRP (International Commission on Non- Ionizing Radiation Protection) and the IEEE's ICES (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers' Interna-tional Committee on Electromagnetic Safety). All 21 sections of the report are available as free downloads from the BioInitiative website at www.bioinitiative.org. Michael Lerner, Founding Partner
A major new report on EMF (electromagnetic fields), the BioInitiative Report, has been produced and published by David Carpenter and Cindy Sage. Lou Slesin, editor of the authoritative Microwave News website, greeted it this way: August 29... An international group of researchers has thrown down the gauntlet. The BioInitiative Working Group is challenging the EMF power structure to set much stricter exposure standards for power lines, cell phones, cell towers and other sources of electromagnetic radiation. "'Business as usual' is unacceptable," says David Carpenter, the director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at New York's University of Albany, on releasing the working group's extensive report. Its general conclusion is that there are many biological effects at levels that are well below current standards and that the "existing safety limits are inadequate to protect public health." Carpenter and Cindy Sage, a consultant based in Santa Barbara, California, coordinated the BioInitiative group and edited the report.
Among the group's key recommendations are:
a 1mG limit for homes where children and/or pregnant women live;
a "precautionary limit" of 0.1μW/cm² (0.6V/m) for RF exposures where "people live, work and go to school."

These proposed levels are on the order of 1,000 times more stringent than current limits adopted by ICNIRP (International Commission on Non- Ionizing Radiation Protection) and the IEEE's ICES (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers' Interna-tional Committee on Electromagnetic Safety). All 21 sections of the report are available as free downloads from the BioInitiative website at www.bioinitiative.org. Michael Lerner, Founding Partner

More info:

Published by: BioElectricShield on Dec 24, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/01/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
Release Date: August 31, 2007
BioInitiative Report:
A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public ExposureStandard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)
Organizing Committee:
Carl Blackman, USAMartin Blank, USAMichael Kundi, AustriaCindy Sage, USA
Participants:
David Carpenter, USAZoreh Davanipour, USADavid Gee, DenmarkLennart Hardell, SwedenOlle Johansson, SwedenHenry Lai, USAKjell Hansson Mild, SwedenEugene Sobel, USAZhengping Xu and Guangdin Chen, China
Research AssociateS. Amy Sage, USA
 
PREFACE
The Organizing Committee thanks the participants of the BioIniativeWorking Group for their integrity and intellectual courage in dealingwith this controversial and important topic; and for devoting the timeand energy to produce their chapters. The information andconclusions in each chapter are the responsibilities of the authors ofthat chapter.The Group has produced what the authors hope will be a benchmarkfor good science and public health policy planning. It documentsbioeffects, adverse health effects and public health conclusions aboutimpacts of non-ionizing radiation (electromagnetic fields includingextremely-low frequency ELF-EMF and radiofrequency/microwaveor RF-EMF fields).Societal decisions about this body of science have global implications.Good public health policy depends on acting soon enough, but notwithout cause, and with enough information to guide intelligentactions. To a great degree, it is the definition of the standard ofevidence used to judge the scientific reports that shapes this debate.Disagreement about when the evidence is sufficient to take action hasmore to do with the outcome of various reviews and standard-settingproceedings than any other single factor. Whatever “standard of
1
 
evidence” is selected to assess the strength of the science will deeplyinfluence the outcome of decisions on public policy.We are at a critical juncture in this world-wide debate. The answerslie not only in the various branches of science; but necessarily dependon the involvement of public health and policy professionals, theregulatory, legal and environmental protection sectors, and thepublic sector.This has been a long-term collaboration of international scientistsemploying a multi-disciplinary approach to problem assessment andsolving. Our work has necessarily relied on tools and approachesacross the physical, biological and engineering sciences; and those ofthe environmental scientist and public health professional. Onlywhen taken together can we see the whole and begin to take stepsthat can prevent possible harm and protect future generations.
Signed: Signed:David Carpenter, MD Cindy Sage, MACo-Editor Co-EditorBioInitiative Report BioInitiative Report
2

Activity (7)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
in678 liked this
bhbatson liked this
steve_y liked this
jagc.es liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->