U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t
F o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f C a l i f o r n i a
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAORACLE AMERICA, INC.,Plaintiff,v.GOOGLE INC.,Defendant./ No. C 10-03561 WHA
SPECIAL VERDICT FORMY
OUR ANSWERS MUST BE UNANIMOUS
.
1.Has Oracle proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Google infringesclaim 11, 27, 29, 39, 40, or 41 of United States Patent Number RE38,104?Yes No(Infringing)(Not Proven)
C
LAIM
11:
________________
C
LAIM
27:
________________
C
LAIM
29:
________________
C
LAIM
39:
________________
C
LAIM
40:
________________
C
LAIM
41:
________________
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1153-1 Filed05/15/12 Page1 of 2
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Oracle v. Google: Special Verdict Form for Patent Phase
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM FOR PHASE 2 (Answers must be unanimous.)
1.0K
Reads
0
Readcasts
15.3K
Embed Views
Get Scribd Mobile
To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
We'll never share your phone number.
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
