iii
The third alternative is to conduct an aerosol release of nonviable (killed)
B.
subtilis
spores for testing sensors during non-revenue hours for the subway. Thetrains would be operated to mimic a peak schedule, but no passengers would bepresent in the stations. This alternative would alter the test conditions, but notthe test material or release as described in Alternative 2.The fourth alternative would be the direct injection of viable
B.
subtilis
sporeaerosol into a single sensor during operational hours for the subway, and captureall of the test material within the sensor such that it does not enter the subwaystation environment at all. This alternative would not alter the proposed testmaterial, but would alter the test release and conditions as described inAlternative 1.Due to the potential human health and safety risks posed by the presence ofsensitive populations, to include immune-compromised riders during operationalhours, the aerosolization of viable spores to challenge the biosensor system, asoutlined in Alternative 1, is not recommended. Implementing the use ofnonviable material, as outlined in Alternatives 2 and 3, will ensure the health andsafety of all subway riders including sensitive populations without compromisingthe results of the testing activities. Alternative 4 presents no potential adversehuman health or safety impacts; however the procedure as outlined does notfulfill the purpose of the aerosol tests.The indirect environmental effects caused by the potential exposure of terrestrialwildlife by movement of the material out of subway tunnels and into the open airwere also evaluated. The environmental consequences posed by any of thealternatives as outlined will not have an adverse effect on terrestrial wildlife.In accordance with Executive Order 12898,
analysis of the environmental effectsmust also include effects on minority communities and low-income communities,when such analysis is required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. section 4321 et esq. Overall, populations using the subwayas well as those living in and around the effected subway stations do notdisproportionally represent minority and low-income populations; implementationof alternatives has no adverse impact on resources, human health or theenvironment.As a commercial biofungicide, the
B.
subtilis
test material has undergonerigorous studies to evaluate the potential health effects and safety of the materialfor the general public, workers and environments surrounding the commercialuse, and no adverse health effects from low level exposure to
B.
subtilis
inhealthy populations have been documented. The quantity of material proposedfor these tests is well below the dose rates for the toxicology testing of thesebiofungicides and the reported results provide a conservative comparison.Therefore, Alternative 1 would be the preferred test condition to provide the mostrealistic challenge to the system. However, taking into account any health-