Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
PBSO Nurse Arrest Ruling

PBSO Nurse Arrest Ruling

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,319 |Likes:
Published by rabdill

More info:

Published by: rabdill on May 21, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/21/2012

pdf

text

original

 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No.1 1-80374-Civ-Hopkins
MARJORIE DEPALIS-LACHAUD,Plaintiff,
VS.
KENNETH E. NOEL, et al.,Defendants.
F $ L C- C- th ) DC .
At 1 1 2 B ! 2
S T E t? ()?k ,k1 . L/& F: ! .4 O R 6f 
--
CI-ERK tJ .Sf.1 Ci 1 . CT.S .D .OF FLA
-
W, R E1 .
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DE 16) AND
GMNTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FORPARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DE 22)
THIS CAUSE is before this Courtuponthe pmies' consentto magistratejudgejmisdiction
and an Order referring the instant case to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for tlnal
disposition. (DE 27, 28).Presently beforethe Courtarethe parties' cross-motions for summojudgment. Defendantsfiled their motion for summary judgment on December 15, 201 1. (DE 16). Plaintiff tsled her
response to Defendants' motion and a cross-motion for partial summaryjudgment on December 26,
201 1 . (DE 22). Thereafter, Plaintiff filtd a statement of facts (DE 45), and Defendants Gled
response/reply papers. (DE 58, 59, 60).These motions are now ripe for this Court's review.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff initiated this civil rights lawsuit following an incident that occurred on the evening
of June 17, 2009, while she was working as a nurse at the U
.
S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Medical Center in Palm Beach County, Florida ($çV.A.''). See Amended Complaint (DE 12). On that
evening, a patient was admitted to the V
.
A. for injtuies he sustained in a car accident. Shortly
Case 9:11-cv-80374-JMH Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2012 Page 1 of 27
 
thereafter, at approximately 10:00 p
.
m., Defendant Noel, a deputy sheriff with the Palm BeachCounty Sheriff s Department
,
arrived at the V.A. to conduct an impairment assessment of the
patienvdriver. See Defendant Noel's Dep
.
Tr. at p. 18-19, 21 (DE 17-1). After interviewing thepatient, Defendant Noel suspected that he had been driving under the intluence (($DUI'')
,
and
Defendant Noel wanted to take a blood ssmple right away in order to confirm his suspicion
.
See
Noel Dep. Tr. at p. 24-25.
At approximately 10:30 p.m., DefendantNoel approached the nurses' station and demandedthat someone collect a blood sample from the patient
.
See Noel Dep Tr. at pages 26
,
28; Plaintifps
Dep. Tr. at pages 39-40 (DE 17-5). Plaintiff and another nurse
,
Linda Denison, explained toDefendant Noel that the V.A.'S policy precluded them from collecting the blood
.
See Noel Dep. Tr.
at pages 43, 44; Plaintifps Dep. Tr. at pages 28
,
35, 44, 93. Defendant Noel then advised Plaintiffand Nurse Denison that he needed the blood snmple for his DUI investigation and that if they failedto comply with his order, they would be obstructing his investigation
,
in violation of Florida Statute
j 843.02, and he would arrest them. See Noel Dep. Tr. at pages 28-30) Plaintiffs Dep
 
Tr. at pages
47, 49. Defendant Noel again directed Plaintiff to draw the patient's blood
.
See Noel Dep. Tr. at
page 30. According to Defendant Noel
,
he asked Plaintiff, ç$$ galre you going to draw this blood, yes
or no,' and she stated tNo.''' See Noel Dep
.
Tr. at page 30. However, according to Plaintiff
,
sheadvised Defendant Noel that: çfWe're waiting for the doctor
.
The doctor has to make that decision
.
We're waiting for the doctor to see if he gives an order to get the blood
.
We cannot take blood from
the patient without a doctor's order'' See Plaintiff s Dep. Tr. at pages 44-45
,
47.
In any event, it is undisputed that Defendant Noel placed Plaintiff in handcuffs and escorted
her outside to his patrol car
 
See Noel Dep. Tr. at pages 30-31; Plaintiffs Dep
.
Tr. at pages 50, 52
2
Case 9:11-cv-80374-JMH Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2012 Page 2 of 27
 
54, 57.1 When Defendant Noel rettmwd to the V
.
A., he handed Nurse Denison the blood collectionkit and she drew the blood from the patient
.
See Noel Dep. Tr. at pages 34-35
,
38. Thereafter,
Defendant Noel released Plaintiff from custody and issued her a notice to a
ppear in court on the
obstruction charge. See Noel Dep
.
Tr. at page 42; Plaintiffs Dep Tr
 
at page 61. Ultimately, the
Palm Beach County State Attomey's Office declined to prosecute the charge
.
(DE 12 at ! 34, 91).
ln her Amended Complaint, Plaintiff alleges two counts of false arrest (Counts I and Il) andtwo counts of false imprisonment (Cotmts Il1 and IV) against Defendant Noel
,
based on purportedviolations of he Fourth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of he FourteenthAmendment.
(DE 12).2 Plaintiff also alleges a violation of htr Fourth Amendment right to be protected from a
n
unreasonable seizure against Defendant Bradshaw
,
in his official capacity as the Palm Beach CountySheriff. Plaintiff contends that the Sheriff s Department promulgated an unlawful policy directingdeputies to çlobtain blood samples from medical staffs by any means
,
including arrest or
imprisonment.'' tcount VIIDE 12 at ! 92).Plaintiff alleges a claim of inadequate training and
supervision againstDefendant Bradshaw
,
whom she claims was deliberately indifferentto her Fourth
The smveillance video of the nurses' station from that evening (submitted by Plaintiff
in support of her motion), shows Defendant Noel attempting to hand Plaintiff something
(presumably, a blood collection kit) at 1 1:06 p.m. One minute later
,
at 1 1:07 p.m., the video
shows Defendant Noel behind tht nurses' station
,
physically removing Plaintiff from her deskchair and handcuffing her
 
The video shows that Defendant Noel immediately escorted Plaintifffrom the emergency room
.
See DVD recording of V.A. emergency room surveillance video on
Jtme 17, 2009. (DE 37).
2 According to the Amended Complaint
,
Plaintiff is ç:a Black U.S. Citizen of Haitian
origin.'' (DE 12 at !3). In her motion papers, she claims that there is çça genuine issue of fact ms
to whether Defendant Noel selected Plaintiff for arrest based on her race
.
'' (DE 22 at paje 14).laintiff alleges th
at drefendant Noel treated (herl differently than similarly situated whlte
persons, and Plaintiffs race or national origin was the motivating factor in Defendant Noel'sseledion of Plaintiff for arrest
.
'' (DE 22 at page 16).
3
Case 9:11-cv-80374-JMH Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2012 Page 3 of 27

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->