Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
UWBK 5-22-2012 MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF FACTS WITH REFERENCES TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

UWBK 5-22-2012 MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF FACTS WITH REFERENCES TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

Ratings: (0)|Views: 261|Likes:
Published by Griswold
UNITED WESTERN BANK, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER )
OF THE CURRENCY, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
_______________________________________)
1:11-cv-00408
The Honorable Amy Berman Jackson
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF FACTS WITH REFERENCES TO THE
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
UNITED WESTERN BANK, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER )
OF THE CURRENCY, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
_______________________________________)
1:11-cv-00408
The Honorable Amy Berman Jackson
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF FACTS WITH REFERENCES TO THE
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

More info:

Published by: Griswold on May 23, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/05/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_______________________________________)UNITED WESTERN BANK, ))Plaintiff, ))v.
 
))OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER )OF THE CURRENCY,
et al.
, ))Defendants. )_______________________________________)1:11-cv-00408The Honorable Amy Berman Jackson
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF FACTS WITHREFERENCES TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
Plaintiff United Western Bank (“the Bank”) respectfully moves to strike Defendants’Statement of Facts with References to the Administrative Record.
See
ECF No. 100-2. Such astatement is not permitted in administrative review cases.
See
LCvR 7(h)(2). Thus, Defendants’summary judgment submissions exceed the page limit of 45 pages set by the Local Rules of theUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia.
See
LCvR 7(e).Pursuant to Local Rule 7(m), Plaintiff informed Defendants of the intended motion. TheBank did not receive any response.
Case 1:11-cv-00408-ABJ Document 102 Filed 05/22/12 Page 1 of 8
 
 
2Respectfully submitted,./s/ Andrew L. Sandler.  Andrew L. Sandler (DC Bar No. 387825)Samuel J. Buffone (DC Bar No. 161828)Liana R. Prieto (DC Bar No. 987287)Michael R. Williams (D.C. Bar No. 994953)B
UCKLEY
S
ANDLER
LLP1250 24th St., NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20037(202) 349-8001 (Telephone)(202) 349-8080 (Facsimile) /s/ Lawrence D. Kaplan. Kirby D. Behre (DC Bar No. 398461)Lawrence D. Kaplan (DC Bar No. 415186)P
AUL
H
ASTINGS
LLP875 15th Street NWWashington, DC 20005(202) 551-1719 (Telephone)(202) 551-0119 (Facsimile) /s/ Theodore J. Abariotes. Theodore J. AbariotesDeputy General CounselU
NITED
W
ESTERN
B
ANCORP
,
 
I
NC
.700 17th Street, Suite 2100Denver, Colorado 80202(720) 932-4216 (Telephone)(720) 946-1218 (Facsimile)
 Attorneys for Plaintiff United Western Bank 
Dated: May 22, 2012
Case 1:11-cv-00408-ABJ Document 102 Filed 05/22/12 Page 2 of 8
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_______________________________________)UNITED WESTERN BANK, ))Plaintiff, ))v. ))OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER )OF THE CURRENCY,
et al.
, ))Defendants. )_______________________________________)1:11-cv-00408The Honorable Amy Berman Jackson
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKEDEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF FACTS WITH REFERENCES TO THEADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
Defendants have filed 77 pages of briefing on a motion that is limited to 45 pages.Defendants first submitted a 40-page memorandum in support of their motion for summary judgment (and in opposition to United Western Bank’s motion for summary judgment).
See
ECF No. 100-1. But they also included a separate 37-page “Statement of Facts With Referencesto the Administrative Record.”
See
ECF No. 100-2. This second document contains 107separate paragraphs detailing Defendants’ view of the case.
1
Having outlined the facts in thissupplemental filing, Defendants’ separate memorandum then opines on various aspects of thecase without providing a full recitation of the relevant facts. Defendants’ separate “Statement of Facts” should be stricken in its entirety, as the document is nothing more than an attempt to
1
In addition to “facts,” the statement is rife with argument.
See, e.g.
, ECF No. 100-2 at 20 (“TheInvestment Agreement was neither the first nor the last time the Bank proposed an unrealisticrecapitalization plan to its regulators.”);
id.
at 22 n.24 (“The fact is that the Anchor Investors’ contingentpromises … were no more reliable than the Bank’s many previous promises that recapitalization was justa short period away.”).
Case 1:11-cv-00408-ABJ Document 102 Filed 05/22/12 Page 3 of 8

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->