PUBLICVERSION
I.Procedural
Background
TheCommission'sRulesprovidethatsubsequenttoaninitialdeterminatienonthequestionofviolationofsection337oftheTariffActof1930,asamended,19U.S.C.
§
1337,theadministrativelawjudgeshallissuearecommendeddeterminationcontainingfindingsoffactandrecommendationsconcerning:(1)theappropriateremedyintheeventthattheCommissionfindsaviolationofsection337,and(2)theamountofbondtobepostedbyrespondentsduringPresidentialreviewofCommissionactionundersection337(j).19C.F.R.
§
210.42(a)(1)(ii).OnApril23,2012,aninitialdetermination("ID")issuedinthisinvestigation,findingthataviolationofsection337oftheTariffAct,asamended,hasoccurredintheimportationintotheUnitedStates,thesaleforimportation,orthesalewithintheUnitedStatesafterimportation,ofcertaingamingandentertainmentconsoles,relatedsoftware,orcomponentsthereofthatinfringeassertedclaims1and12ofU.S.PatentNo.6,069,896;assertedclaims7,8,and10of:U.S.PatentNo.7,162,094;assertedclaim2ofU.S.PatentNo.6,980,596;andassertedclaims12
..1
and13ofU.S.PatentNo.5,357,571.
II.RemedyA.LimitedExclusionOrder
TheCommissionhasbroaddiscretioninselectingtheform,scope,andextentoftheremedyinasection337proceeding.
Viscofan,S.A.v.UnitedStatesInt'lTradeComm'n,787
1
ThecomplainantsareMotorolaMobility,Inc.ofLibertyville,IllinoisandGeneralInstrumentCorporationofHorsham,Pennsylvania(collectively,"Motorola").IDat1.TherespondentisMicrosoftCorporationofRedmond,Washington("Microsoft"),
Id.
AlthoughtheCommissionnamedtheOfficeofUnfairImportInvestigations("OUII")asapartyintheinvestigation,OUIIwithdrewfromparticipationinaccordancewiththeCommission'sStrategicHumanCapitalPlan.
See
75Fed.Reg.80843(2010);LetterfromOUIItotheAdministrativeLawJudge(Mar.3,2011):2