Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This publication is 75 percent funded by Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, the Pittman-Robertson (P-R) Program, which provides funding through an excise tax on the sale of sporting firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment. The remaining 25 percent of the funding is matched by the Connecticut Wildlife Division.
8/2007
Table of Contents
Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2006 Spring Gobbler Season ............................................................................. 1 2006 Spring Hunter Survey Results ................................................................... 6 2005 Fall Firearms Turkey Season..................................................................... 8 2005 Fall Archery Turkey Season ...................................................................... 9 Hunter Safety and Ethics ................................................................................. 12 Outlook ........................................................................................................... 14 10 Commandments for Safe Turkey Hunting .................................................. 15 Appendix A. Connecticut's spring wild turkey harvest by town, ..................... 17 1998-2006. Appendix B. Spring turkey harvest from state-owned and state- .................... 21 managed lands, 2005 and 2006. Appendix C. Ruffed grouse observations from turkey hunter ......................... 24 surveys, 2005-2006
List of Tables
Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4. Table 5. Table 6. Table 7. Table 8. Table 9. Harvest and success rates of Connecticut spring turkey hunters on private and state land, 2005 and 2006. Gobblers harvested during the spring 2005 and 2006 seasons, grouped by turkey management zone. Connecticut state land lottery results for the 2006 spring turkey hunting season. Experiences of hunters during Connecticut's 2006 spring gobbler season as reported on hunter surveys. Economic and recreational benefits provided by the 2006 Connecticut spring turkey hunting season. Wild turkey harvest by town during the 2004 and 2005 fall firearms turkey seasons. Turkeys harvested during the 2005 fall archery and firearms turkey seasons, grouped by turkey management zone. Age and sex of birds harvested during the 2005 fall firearms turkey season. Wild turkey harvest by town during the 2004 and 2005 fall archery turkey seasons.
List of Figures
Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Distribution of Connecticut's 2006 spring turkey harvest. Connecticut's 12 turkey management zones. Ratio of juvenile to adult gobblers taken during Connecticut's spring wild turkey seasons, 1982-2006. Growth index (first day harvest/permits issued) for Connecticut's wild turkey population, 1982-2006. Distribution of 2006 grouse sightings as reported on the spring turkey hunter surveys.
ii
Introduction
The goal of the Connecticut Turkey Management Program is to manage wild turkey populations at levels compatible with available habitat and various land uses and to allow for a sustained yield of turkeys for use by the people of Connecticut. Wild turkeys continue to be abundant throughout Connecticut, providing the public with wildlife viewing and hunting opportunities. Starting in the summer of 2006, a brood survey was initiated to assist with tracking annual turkey productivity. This information will be collected statewide annually from June through August. Regulations are being proposed to allow spring turkey hunters to obtain both private and state land permits. If this change is approved, a spring turkey hunter could potentially harvest 5 turkeys during the spring season. Be sure to review the current Connecticut Hunting and Trapping Guide thoroughly before going afield to ensure you are aware of new opportunities. This report presents a summary of the fall 2005 and spring 2006 wild turkey hunting seasons in Connecticut. For most Connecticut sportsmen, turkey hunting means spring gobbler hunting. Because of its popularity, information for the 2006 spring season is presented first, followed by highlights from the 2005 fall seasons.
Harvest by Town
At least 1 bird was taken from 147 of Connecticuts 169 towns (Figure 1, Appendix A). Twenty or more birds were taken from 26 towns and 40 or more birds were taken from 3 towns. The towns of Cornwall (44), Lebanon (52), and Woodstock (40) had the highest turkey harvest.
Harvest by Zone
Similar to 2005, the northeastern corner of the state (turkey management zone 5) reported the greatest harvest among Connecticuts 12 turkey management zones in 2006 (Table 2, Figure 2). Prior to 2004, northwestern Connecticut (zone 1) had typically held this distinction. The west-central (zone 6), south-central (zone 8), and northeast-central (zones 4a and 4b) parts of the state recorded the lowest
Table 1. Harvest and success rates of Connecticut spring turkey hunters on private and state land, 2005 and 2006.
Permit Type Private Land 2005 2006 % Change 05-06 State Land Lottery 2005 2006 % Change 05-06 Total No. Hunters 5,446 5,024 -7.7% 344 379 10.2% Total Harvest 1,793 1,581 -11.8% 75 45 -40.0% 148 134 -9.5% 2,016 1,760 -12.7% No. Successful Hunters 1,140 1,019 -10.6% 59 38 -35.6% 114 114 0.0% 1,313 1,171 -10.8% Success Rate 20.9% 20.3%
17.2% 10.0%
State Land No-lottery 2005 1,260 2006 1,220 % Change 05-06 -3.2% Overall Total 2005 2006 % Change 05-06 7,050 6,624 -6.0%
9.0% 9.3%
18.6% 17.7%
harvest. Harvest levels continue to be highest in zones 5, 1, 9, 2, and 3, where some of the best turkey habitat exists and hunter access is good.
Population Dynamics
The spring harvest consisted of 511 juvenile and 1,241 adult birds. The de-
Table 2. Gobblers harvested during the spring 2005 and 2006 seasons, grouped by turkey management zone.
Zone 1 2 3 4A 4B 5 6 Harvest 2005 2006 189 194 137 88 64 297 121 203 164 163 64 49 246 78 Change (%) 7.4% -15.4% 18.9% -27.3% -23.4% -17.2% -35.5% Zone 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total 3 Harvest 2005 2006 137 128 187 126 156 192 2,016 126 93 168 136 124 146 1,760 Change (%) -8.0% -27.3% -10.2% 7.9% -20.5% -23.9%
creased ratio of juveniles to adults in the harvest (29.2% in 2006 versus 35.4% in 2005 and 31.4% in 2004) may be due to decreased recruitment of young birds into the 2005 spring turkey population (Figure 3). Harvest statistics indicate the growth rate of Connecticuts wild turkey population varies annually, depending upon many variables, including weather, predation, habitat condition, and food availability. The turkey population index (total number of birds taken on opening day divided by the total number of turkey hunters) indicated a noticeable increase in turkey population growth during 1998 and 2003 and a reduced but average growth rate during 1999 through 2002 (Figure 4). Both the harvest age ratio and population index suggest that weather conditions in the spring of 1999 were favorable for nesting hens and their young. However, weather conditions in the springs from 2000 to 2005 were less favorable for nesting turkeys. Since 2000, the spring season harvests, adult to juvenile ratios, and turkey population growth indices indicate that Connecticuts wild turkey population has been stabilizing.
Table 3. Connecticut state land lottery results for the 2006 spring turkey hunting season.
Turkey Hunting Area 1 2 3 4 5 13 14 18 51 57 Total Permit Quota 2006 82 32 31 97 10 35 21 102 51 28 489 Permits Remaining 2006 3 0 2 21 0 0 0 21 26 5 78
Figure 3. Ratio of juvenile to adult gobblers taken during Connecticut's spring wild turkey seasons, 1982-2006.
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Year
Figure 4. Growth index (first day harvest/permits issued) for Connecticut's wild turkey population, 1982-2006.
0.09 0.08 0.07
Growth Index
0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Year
Nonresident Hunters
Non-resident hunters accounted for 246 of the 1,760 birds harvested (13.9%). Most non-resident hunters came from neighboring states. Hunters from Massachusetts (36.2% of birds taken), Rhode Island (16.3%), Vermont (8.9%), and Maine (7.3%) figured most prominently in the non-resident turkey harvest. Interest in hunting Connecticuts wild turkeys is not limited to New England hunters; a few participants came from as far away as Alaska, Arizona, and Florida, as well as Canada (Nova Scotia). Participation by non-residents shows that Connecticuts reputation for quality wild turkey hunting extends across the continent.
Table 4. Experiences of hunters during Connecticut's 2006 spring gobbler season as reported on hunter surveys.
Private Land* No. Surveys Returned Reported Harvest Mean Outings Per Hunt Mean Hours Per Outing Mean Hours Per Bird Harvested Mean Gobblers Heard Per Outing Mean Toms Seen Per Outing Mean Hens Seen Per Outing Mean Hunters Seen Per Outing 1,567 1,148 4.1 3.6 19.3 2.7 1.2 1.2 0.5 State Land Lottery No-lottery 201 46 3.8 4.3 66.9 1.9 0.6 0.7 0.7 440 91 3.3 3.8 57.8 1.8 0.5 0.6 0.8 All Hunters** 2,208 1,285 3.9 3.7 23.8 1.9 1.1 1.1 0.5
Table 5. Economic and recreational benefits provided by the 2006 Connecticut spring turkey hunting season.
Total Permits Permit Type No. Issued Revenue Private State No-lottery Lottery Total 4,590 1,220 379 6,189 $64,260** $17,080 $5,306 $86,646 Hunting Expenses* Average $139 $131 $140 Total $698,475 $159,820 $53,060 $911,355 Hunter Days of Recreation* Average 4.1 4.6 3.8 Total 20,603 5,612 1,440 27,655
* Values for hunting expenses and hunter-days of recreation were derived from hunter
surveys. ** Excludes 435 landowner permits issued free-of-charge.
Information from surveys was used to estimate the economic and recreational benefits provided by spring turkey hunting. Overall, spring turkey hunters enjoyed 27,655 days afield and spent $911,355 on hunting-related items (Table 5). This compares to 26,137 hunting days and $1,154,518 on hunting-related expenses in 2005. Holders of all permit types hunted about the same amount in 2005 and 2006. Permit sales in 2006 generated $86,446 for the states General Fund. The 2006 spring turkey hunter survey also was used to quantify hunters perceptions of trends in Connecticuts wild turkey population. Hunters ranked the wild turkey population on a scale of 1 (decreasing) to 6 (increasing). Approximately half of spring turkey hunters responding to the survey believed the turkey population was stable (47% versus 48.5% in 2005.) Of the remainder, 32.2% believed the turkey population was increasing and 20.8% believed it was decreasing. The mean statewide rank of Connecticuts turkey population growth for 2006 was 3.3, representing a slight increase over 2005s rank of 3.2. To obtain distribution information about the ruffed grouse population in the state, a question was added to the 2005 and 2006 turkey hunter surveys. Hunters were asked to report whether they heard or observed ruffed grouse and, if so, provide the town in which the encounter occurred. Hunters reported 204 encounters with ruffed grouse. Towns with the greatest numbers of grouse encounters were Goshen (18), Hartland (13), Cornwall (11), and Woodstock (11) (Figure 5). A grouse population index was derived by dividing total grouse observations by total number of surveys returned; the 2006 index was 9.2. This was similar to the 2005 index of 9.1, indicating that spring turkey hunters encountered grouse at nearly the same rate both years.
Figure 5. Distribution of 2006 grouse sightings as reported on the spring turkey hunter surveys.
Table 6. Wild turkey harvest by town during the 2004 and 2005 fall firearms turkey seasons.
Town of Harvest Ashford Barkhamsted Bethany Bethlehem Bozrah Brookfield Brooklyn Burlington Canterbury Canton Chaplin Colchester Colebrook Columbia Cornwall Coventry Cromwell Danbury Durham East Granby East Haddam East Hampton East Lyme East Windsor Eastford Easton Enfield Essex Franklin Goshen Glastonbury Granby Griswold Guilford Haddam No. of Birds 2004 2005 8 0 0 1 1 1 5 1 2 0 1 5 2 5 3 4 1 1 2 1 3 0 1 2 0 6 1 1 2 9 0 3 0 1 6 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 5 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 1 4 1 3 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 Town of Harvest Hamden Hampton Hartland Harwinton Hebron Kent Killingly Lebanon Ledyard Lisbon Litchfield Lyme Manchester Mansfield Middlebury Middlefield Middletown New Fairfield New Hartford New Milford Newtown Norfolk North Branford North Canaan North Haven North Stonington Old Lyme Old Saybrook Oxford Plainfield Pomfret Portland Preston Prospect Putnam No. of Birds 2004 2005 1 2 1 0 3 2 0 9 8 0 1 6 0 2 2 8 6 1 4 0 7 0 1 2 1 4 2 2 4 0 2 4 0 2 1 0 0 3 3 1 2 1 4 4 1 1 2 3 5 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 3 0 0
Table 6, continued Town of Harvest Redding Ridgefield Roxbury Salem Salisbury Scotland Sharon Sherman Southbury Southington Sprague Stafford Sterling Stonington Stratford Suffield Thomaston No. of Birds 2004 2005 3 1 1 1 2 1 8 4 2 0 7 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 2 0 2 0 2 2 3 1 1 1 Town of Harvest Thompson Tolland Torrington Union Voluntown Warren Waterford West Haven Willington Winchester Windham Wolcott Woodbury Woodstock Total No. of Birds 2004 2005 6 2 0 4 2 5 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 10 234 0 0 2 7 0 7 1 0 2 2 4 0 1 16 156
Table 7. Turkeys harvested during the 2005 fall archery and firearms turkey seasons, grouped by turkey management zone.
Zone Harvest Firearms Archery 18 21 14 17 28 4 3 4 2 2 3 0 Zone Harvest Firearms Archery 11 6 10 11 7 9 156 2 2 6 1 14 7 46
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 Total
11
Table 8. Age and sex of birds harvested during the 2005 fall firearms turkey season.
Number Harvested 33 46 38 39 Total 156
Hunter Ethics
In addition to the various state laws and regulations which are enforced, there also is a code of conduct that hunters must obey when hunting. Legal and ethical behavior will result in a safe and quality turkey hunt for all. The Connecticut turkey hunters code of ethics should include the following: Scout several locations. If you find another hunter in the area you wish to hunt, move to a backup site. (If the hunter is trespassing, notify the DEPs T.I.P. hotline at 1-800-842-HELP.) Know all boundaries and setback distances of the land where you have permission to hunt. Never call a bird that another caller is working and do not try to come between the hunter and the bird. If several hunters have permission to hunt a piece of private property, it may be beneficial to coordinate hunting activities. Do this in consultation with the landowner. Determine the maximum number of hunters the property can support
12
Table 9. Wild turkey harvest by town during the 2004 and 2005 fall archery seasons.
Town of Harvest Andover Bethany Bolton Colchester Colebrook Cornwall Cromwell Deep River East Lyme East Windsor Easton Fairfield Glastonbury Goshen Groton Haddam Hamden Kent Lebanon Ledyard Litchfield Lyme Meriden Middlefield Milford Monroe Montville New Canaan New Hartford Newtown Harvest 2004 2005 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 4 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 5 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 3 Town of Harvest North Stonington Old Lyme Orange Plainfield Pomfret Portland Redding Ridgefield Rocky Hill Scotland Sharon Shelton Sherman South Windsor Stonington Stratford Suffield Trumbull Union Vernon Voluntown Wallingford Waterford Weston Wilton Winchester Windham Wolcott Woodstock Total Harvest 2004 2005 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 68 0 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 46
13
on a given day and assign individuals certain days on which to hunt to prevent crowding and hunter interference.
Outlook
The current wild turkey population in Connecticut is estimated at about 35,000. Connecticut offers a diversity of habitat types that provide the wild turkey with all essential habitat components needed for survival. Through continued cooperation among the DEP, National Wild Turkey Federation, sportsmen, other conservation organizations, and private landowners, the future of the wild turkey in Connecticut looks bright.
14
The National Wild Turkey Federations 10 Commandments for Safe Turkey Hunting
1. Never stalk a turkey. The chances of getting close enough for a shot are slim, but the chances of becoming involved in an accident are increased. 2. Eliminate the colors red, white, and blue from your turkey hunting outfit. Red is the color most hunters count on to differentiate a gobblers head from the hens blue-colored head. White can also look like the top of a gobblers head. 3. Never move, wave or make turkey sounds to alert another hunter of your presence. A quick movement may draw fire. Yell in a loud voice and remain well hidden. 4. Never attempt to approach closer than 100 yards to a roosting turkey. The wild turkeys eyesight and hearing are much too sharp to let you get any closer. 5. Be particularly careful when using the gobbler call. The sound and motion may attract other hunters. (Note: The Wildlife Division strongly discourages the use of the gobbler call due to the obvious safety risks it presents.) 6. When selecting a calling position, dont try to hide so well that you cannot see whats happening. Remember, eliminating movement, not total concealment, is your key to success. 7. Select a calling position that provides a background as wide as your shoulders, and one that will completely protect you from the top of your head down. Small trees wont hide slight movements of your hands or shoulders which might look like a turkey to another hunter who might be stalking your calls. Position yourself so you can see 180 degrees in front of you. 8. Camouflage conceals you. It does not make you invisible. When turkey hunting, think and act defensively. Avoid all unnecessary movement. Remember, you are visible to both turkeys and hunters when you move even slightly. 9. Never shoot at sound or movement. Be 100 percent certain of your target before you pull the trigger. 10. When turkey hunting, assume that every sound you hear is made by another hunter. Once you pull the trigger, you can never call that shot back.
15
Appendices
16
17
Appendix A. continued
Town E. Haven E. Lyme E. Windsor Eastford Easton Ellington Enfield Essex Fairfield Farmington Franklin Glastonbury Goshen Granby Greenwich Griswold Groton Guilford Haddam Hamden Hampton Hartford Hartland Harwinton Hebron Kent Killingly Killingworth Lebanon Ledyard Lisbon Litchfield Lyme Madison Manchester Mansfield Marlborough Meriden Middlebury Middlefield Middletown Milford Monroe 1998 1999 15 5 12 8 18 5 0 1 1 4 28 15 37 6 3 1 0 10 26 17 20 0 10 18 27 19 6 6 30 6 10 38 35 2 2 26 3 0 3 8 28 3 11 1 16 8 18 18 8 7 2 1 4 24 20 29 7 2 6 1 7 28 14 16 0 14 20 18 25 8 15 46 10 8 45 44 1 2 23 7 5 5 5 23 22 7 2000 1 29 13 16 21 10 8 2 2 2 27 14 31 13 2 4 1 10 29 15 21 0 11 13 26 20 12 26 59 9 15 29 43 4 4 22 10 5 5 10 30 2 8 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 0 33 13 20 23 17 7 2 3 1 17 17 35 10 1 5 3 13 39 12 20 0 12 16 30 13 8 22 48 11 11 38 31 7 6 27 18 3 6 12 17 0 9 1 18 6 12 20 9 12 13 3 6 21 16 25 8 2 13 2 21 38 16 22 1 14 16 16 21 12 22 70 4 12 33 28 2 4 26 10 4 1 14 18 2 5 0 29 9 20 21 14 7 7 1 8 28 21 39 17 2 6 6 27 45 17 29 0 14 22 22 21 10 30 76 18 10 38 37 2 4 28 17 4 6 14 39 3 5 1 26 12 13 25 7 14 7 0 8 15 11 38 13 2 15 0 19 26 11 19 0 12 11 18 34 9 20 69 21 13 41 31 1 5 28 19 3 1 6 27 5 3 0 26 11 11 22 19 8 6 2 3 19 14 27 10 0 10 9 20 26 11 26 0 13 14 26 20 11 15 63 21 3 27 43 0 7 13 12 2 5 19 30 3 4 0 23 15 17 8 5 13 5 3 4 19 12 24 9 2 11 4 13 22 7 22 0 9 17 24 30 11 16 52 35 14 31 21 1 5 12 10 0 2 8 22 2 0
18
Appendix A. continued
Town 1998 1999 12 16 7 2 6 23 0 33 32 9 3 4 2 14 0 6 3 1 0 12 8 4 4 28 6 8 4 6 24 2 8 16 6 49 22 0 53 3 6 2 8 14 8 18 13 5 0 9 12 0 27 25 12 3 3 3 31 0 2 11 1 4 21 3 2 4 30 15 8 4 7 23 6 5 13 12 34 18 4 50 5 17 6 5 22 7 2000 28 6 9 3 10 12 0 28 30 14 9 5 1 17 1 4 11 1 3 27 13 3 4 38 13 16 8 13 22 5 2 4 31 25 31 9 56 3 6 2 6 11 10 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 27 13 10 6 9 19 0 34 30 15 9 2 3 5 0 3 14 5 4 26 15 5 7 32 17 17 6 12 39 3 3 17 20 27 34 5 33 4 8 2 7 13 5 24 14 9 0 10 9 0 21 23 3 6 0 3 21 0 6 15 2 0 25 8 0 9 26 16 17 3 15 29 5 0 7 20 19 35 8 30 6 8 9 12 20 10 19 14 7 3 8 19 0 38 35 16 5 16 1 32 1 9 9 6 2 30 17 2 10 28 10 17 3 9 33 4 5 8 22 27 43 5 46 15 16 3 13 21 5 22 17 7 3 12 17 1 22 19 12 12 3 5 19 0 5 4 2 2 21 9 0 8 25 12 13 4 11 46 11 7 5 21 28 28 2 50 10 8 6 12 19 8 20 16 10 2 10 22 1 16 27 15 14 7 4 38 0 5 8 0 5 13 14 2 13 19 7 13 5 8 38 6 10 13 12 18 27 1 38 7 7 5 14 19 3 13 13 0 1 6 25 0 28 29 18 13 2 5 18 0 7 20 0 3 17 8 1 4 15 15 17 7 1 38 5 7 5 13 26 23 2 38 2 13 5 10 15 3 Montville Morris Naugatuck New Canaan New Fairfield New Hartford New Haven New Milford Newtown Norfolk North Branford North Canaan North Haven North Stonington Norwalk Norwich Old Lyme Old Saybrook Orange Oxford Plainfield Plainville Plymouth Pomfret Portland Preston Prospect Putnam Redding Ridgefield Rocky Hill Roxbury Salem Salisbury Scotland Seymour Sharon Shelton Sherman Simsbury Somers Southbury Southington
19
Appendix A. continued
Town S. Windsor Sprague Stafford Stamford Sterling Stonington Stratford Suffield Thomaston Thompson Tolland Torrington Trumbull Union Vernon Voluntown Wallingford Warren Washington Waterbury Waterford Watertown West Haven Westbrook Weston Wethersfield Willington Wilton Winchester Windham Windsor Windsor Locks Wolcott Woodbridge Woodbury Woodstock Towns not reported Total 1998 1999 3 10 6 1 5 10 0 17 4 19 8 17 0 8 0 17 5 22 23 1 7 14 0 4 2 0 1 1 16 16 3 0 4 1 30 44 25 9 8 16 8 6 10 0 12 2 11 7 18 0 3 0 12 5 25 24 2 17 16 2 2 3 1 8 1 18 10 2 2 2 6 30 61 32 2000 11 11 12 1 19 16 0 13 3 19 5 16 2 5 2 16 7 13 24 3 19 15 2 5 4 0 21 1 17 18 4 0 0 6 30 50 25 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 9 9 12 4 12 24 0 14 2 27 9 9 0 9 4 14 10 22 18 1 14 15 0 2 5 0 13 4 17 19 6 0 0 3 25 50 27 13 6 6 4 18 16 0 16 2 22 10 10 1 9 2 11 10 15 16 1 9 10 0 2 2 0 7 2 12 17 4 0 4 2 20 52 14 10 10 18 3 15 12 0 25 2 28 23 14 3 6 0 11 11 32 28 3 18 18 1 1 4 4 8 0 12 17 2 0 7 5 27 48 13 9 14 16 4 10 16 0 9 4 37 17 18 2 6 1 10 12 18 27 0 14 12 2 4 5 3 13 1 9 18 9 0 1 2 11 35 24 12 10 24 2 10 19 7 25 6 21 15 19 1 6 0 7 10 29 10 0 15 11 1 3 0 0 10 3 14 12 3 0 10 1 21 52 0 12 6 9 0 20 16 3 16 2 27 11 8 0 11 1 9 5 10 16 0 10 9 0 9 0 0 18 2 13 8 6 0 5 1 9 40 0
20
Appendix B. Spring turkey harvest from state-owned and state-managed lands, 2005 and 2006.
Turkey Hunting Area No. Birds Harvested 2005 2006 Sq. Miles 11 6 0 1 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 10 1 0 1 0 11 0 2 0 1 15 1 3 6 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 1 0 6 2 2 0 0 13 0 2 16.8 2.5 0.1 6.4 1.1 2.6 1.1 0.7 0.3 1.5 1.2 4.6 14.9 1.9 0.8 2.1 0.4 7.7 0.5 2.3 0.9 0.5 20.8 3.1 12.0 Kill/Sq. Mile 2005 2006 0.7 2.4 0 0.2 2.7 0.8 1.8 0 0 0 0 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.4 0 0.9 0 1.9 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.2 0 0 0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0.5 0 0 0.5 0 0.8 4.1 0.9 0 0 0.6 0 0.2
Lottery Areas
1. Housatonic SF Robbins Swamp WMA Whiting River FCA 2. Wyantenock SF NU-Skiff Mtn. WMA 3. Paugnut SF John Minetto SP Sunnybrook SP Topsmead SF Goshen WMA 4. American Legion SF Peoples SF Tunxis SF Algonquin SF Mad River Dam FCA 5. Nepaug SF Cedar Swamp WMA 13. Nehantic SF Eightmile River WMA 14. Babcock Pond WMA Red Cedar Lake SP Bear Hill WMA 18. Natchaug SF Mansfield Hollow Lake 51. Yale Forest
21
Appendix B. continued
Turkey Hunting Area No. Birds Harvested 2005 2006 Sq. Miles 2 2 0 4 28 2 5 3 0 0 0 9 1 8 1 3 3 5 17 0 2 10 1 8 1 2 0 0 2 2 1 1 6 4 2 0 0 3 2 1 29 3 2 2 6 1 1 3 0 6 0 0 3 1 20 2 1 2 0 11 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 6 1 3 2 1.1 1.1 0.6 1.2 26.9 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.9 1.4 0.4 7.3 0.6 14.0 0.7 1.3 1.9 2.3 7.0 0.7 14.4 2.2 1.2 40.2 3.0 0.3 1.7 2.6 0.5 3.1 1.0 0.4 11.3 10.6 0.3 0.7 Kill/Sq. Mile 2005 2006 1.8 1.9 0 3.4 1.0 1.9 4.5 7.5 0 0 0 1.2 1.6 0.6 1.4 2.3 1.6 2.2 2.4 0 0.1 4.6 0.8 0.2 0.3 6.2 0 0 3.7 0.6 1.0 2.3 0.5 0.4 5.7 0 0 2.8 3.2 0.9 1.1 2.8 1.8 5.0 6.7 0.7 2.7 0.4 0 0.4 0 0 1.6 0.4 2.9 2.8 0.1 0.9 0 0.3 0.7 6.2 0.6 0.4 1.9 0.6 3.1 2.3 0.5 0.1 8.6 2.7
No-lottery Areas
Assekonk SF Bartlett Brook WMA Beaver Broook SP Bishops Swamp WMA Cockaponset SF Franklin Swamp WMA Hancock Brook Higganum Meadows Housatonic River WMA Kollar WMA Larson Lot WMA Mattatuck SF MDC Greenwoods Meshomasic SF Messerschmidt WMA Mohegan SF Nassahegon SF Nathan Hale SF Naugatuck SF Newgate WMA Nipmuck SF NU-Maromas Coop WMA Nye Holeman SF Pachaug SF Paugussett SF Pease Brook WMA Pootatuck SF Quinebaug River WMA Quinnipiac River SP Roraback WMA Rose Hill WMA Ross Marsh WMA Salmon River SF Shenipsit SF Simsbury WMA Spignesi WMA
22
Appendix B. continued
Turkey Hunting Area Talbot WMA Trout Brook Valley George C. Waldo SP Wangunk Meadows West Thompson Dam Wopowog WMA No. Birds Harvested 2005 2006 Sq. Miles 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0.7 0.5 0.2 1.0 3.0 0.7 Kill/Sq. Mile 2005 2006 2.8 3.9 0 1.0 0.7 0 0 0 4.3 2.0 0 1.3
23
Andover Ansonia Ashford Avon Barkhamsted Beacon Falls Berlin Bethany Bethel Bolton Bozrah Bridgewater Bristol Brooklyn Burlington Canaan Canterbury Canton Chaplin Chester Colchester Colebrook Cornwall Coventry Danbury East Granby East Haddam East Hampton Eastford East Lyme East Windsor Ellington Enfield Farmington Goshen Granby
Griswold Haddam Hamden Hampton Hartland Harwinton Hebron Kent Killingly Killingworth Lebanon Ledyard Lisbon Litchfield Lyme Mansfield Marlborough Middlebury Middlefield Middletown Monroe Montville Naugatuck New Canaan New Fairfield New Hartford New Milford Newtown Norfolk North Canaan North Haven North Stonington Old Lyme Oxford Plymouth Pomfret
24
Appendix C. continued
Town No. of Grouse Observations 2005 2006 3 1 1 6 7 1 9 1 2 2 1 5 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 6 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 2 1 Town No. of Grouse Observations 2005 2006 1 2 1 0 4 3 3 1 0 0 5 5 1 1 6 10 217 4 1 0 1 3 3 0 1 1 1 0 6 0 1 10 0 196
Portland Preston Putnam Redding Salisbury Scotland Sharon Sherman Somers Southbury Southington Stafford Stonington Sterling Suffield Thompson Tolland
Torrington Union Voluntown Wallingford Warren Washington Waterford Watertown Westbrook Wethersfield Willington Winchester Windham Woodbury Woodstock Unknown Total
25