Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
Measuringchild poverty
New league tables of child povertyin the world’s rich countries
UNICEFInnocenti Research CentreReport Card 10
 
Which countriesare included?
Data on child deprivation ratesare drawn rom the 2009 roundo the
 European Union Statisticson Income and Living Conditions
 and are thereore available or 29countries, i.e. all 27 countries othe European Union plus Norwayand Iceland. Most o these (23out o 29) are also members othe Organisation or EconomicCo-operation and Development(OECD). The exceptions areBulgaria, Cyprus, Latvia,Lithuania, Malta and Romania,which are EU member states,but not members o the OECD.Data on relative child povertyrates are also available or sixadditional OECD countries(Australia, Canada, Japan,New Zealand, Switzerland, andthe United States). The analysiso relative child poverty thereoreincludes the ollowing 35countries:Australia, Austria, Belgium,Bulgaria, Canada, Cyprus,Czech Republic, Denmark,Estonia, Finland, France,Germany, Greece, Hungary,Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan,Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,Malta, the Netherlands,New Zealand, Norway, Poland,Portugal, Romania, Slovakia,Slovenia, Spain, Sweden,Switzerland, United Kingdom,United States.
 Innocenti Report Card 10
was written by Peter Adamson.Two background papers rom the UNICEF
 Innocenti Research Centre
 support this Report:1. Bradshaw, J., Y. Chzhen, C. de Neubourg, G. Main, B. Martoranoand L. Menchini (2012), ‘Relative Income Poverty among Children inRich Countries’,
 Innocenti Working Pape
2012-01, UNICEF InnocentiResearch Centre, Florence.www.unice-irc.org/publications/pd/iwp_2012_01.pd2. de Neubourg, C., J. Bradshaw, Y. Chzhen, G. Main, B. Martoranoand L. Menchini (2012), ‘Child Deprivation, MultidimensionalPoverty and Monetary Poverty in Europe’,
 Innocenti Working Pape
 2012-02, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.www.unice-irc.org/publications/pd/iwp_2012_02.pdThe UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre would like to acknowledge thegenerous support or
 Report Card 10
provided by the Andorran,Belgian, Swiss and United Kingdom National Committees or UNICEF.Any part o this
 Innocenti Report Card
may be reely reproduced usingthe ollowing reerence:UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre (2012), ‘Measuring Child Poverty:New league tables o child poverty in the world’s rich countries’,
 Innocenti Report Card 10
, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.The
 Report Card
series is designed to monitor and compare theperormance o economically advanced countries in securing the rightso their children.The Innocenti Research Centre (IRC) was established in Florence, Italyin 1988 to strengthen the research capability o the United NationsChildren’s Fund (UNICEF) and to support its advocacy or childrenworldwide. IRC is the dedicated research hub o the UNICEF Oce oResearch (OOR), which provides global leadership or the organization’sstrategic research agenda around children. The Oce aims to set out acomprehensive ramework or research and knowledge within theorganization, in support o its global programmes and policies. Throughstrengthening research partnerships with leading academic institutionsand development networks in both the North and South, the Oceseeks to leverage additional resources and infuence in support oeorts towards policy reorm in avour o children.The Centre's publications are contributions to a global debate on childrights and help acilitate ull implementation o the Convention on theRights o the Child in low-, middle- and high-income countries. Theviews expressed are those o the authors and researchers and do notnecessarily refect the policies or views o UNICEF.© United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), May 2012ISBN: 978-88-8912-965-4ISSN: 1605-7317UNICEF Innocenti Research CentrePiazza SS. Annunziata, 1250122 Florence, ItalyTel: (+39) 055 2033 0Fax: (+39) 055 2033 220forence@unice.orgwww.unice-irc.org
 
This report sets out the latest internationally comparable data onchild deprivation and relative child poverty. Taken together, thesetwo dierent measures oer the best currently available pictureo child poverty across the world’s wealthiest nations. Previous reports in this series have shown that ailure to protect children rom poverty is one o the most costly mistakes a society can make. The heaviest cost o all is borne by thechildren themselves. But their nations must also pay a very signifcant price – in reduced skills and productivity, in lower levels o health and educational achievement, in increased likelihood o unemployment and welare dependence, in the higher costs o judicial and social protection systems, and inthe loss o social cohesion.The economic argument, in anything but the shortest term, isthereore heavily on the side o protecting children rom poverty. Even more important is the argument in principle. Becausechildren have only one opportunity to develop normally in mind and body, the commitment to protection rom poverty must beupheld in good times and in bad. A society that ails to maintainthat commitment, even in difcult economic times, is a societythat is ailing its most vulnerable citizens and storing up intractable social and economic problems or the years immediately ahead. It is or these reasons that this comparative snapshot o child poverty in the industrialized nations is presented or the attention o political leaders, press and public.
UNICEFInnocenti Research Centre
InnocentI RepoRt caRd 10
1
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more