Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Zhang Bo Plea Argeement

Zhang Bo Plea Argeement

Ratings: (0)|Views: 450|Likes:
Published by bkatzoom

More info:

Published by: bkatzoom on May 29, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/30/2012

pdf

text

original

 
U.S.DepartmentofJustice
UnitedStatesAttorneySouthernDistrictofNewYork
TheSilvio
J.
MolloBuildingOneSainiAndrew'sPlazaNewYork,NewYork10007
April12,2012JeffreyLichtman,Esq.LawOfficesofJeffreyLichtman750LexingtonAve.,15
th
FloorNewYork,NY10022
Re:UnitedStatesv.BoZhang,alkla"BryanZhang,"12Cr.390(pGG)
Dear
Mr.
Lichtman:Ontheunderstandingsspecifiedbelow,theOfficeoftheUnitedStatesAttorneyfortheSouthernDistrictofNewYork("thisOffice")willacceptaguiltypleafromBoZhang,a/k/a"BryanZhang,"("thedefendant")toCountsOneandTwooftheabove-referencedInformation.CountOnechargesthedefendantwiththeftofgovernmentproperty,inviolationofTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,Section641,andcarriesamaximumtermofimprisonmentof10years,amaximumtermofsupervisedreleaseof3years,amaximumfine,pursuanttoTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,Section3571·ofthegreatestof$250,000,twicethegrosspecuniarygainderivedfromtheoffense,ortwicethegrosspecuniarylosstopersonsotherthanthedefendantresultingfromtheoffense,anda$100mandatoryspecialassessment.CountTwochargesthedefendantwithvisafraud,inviolationofTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,Section1546,andcarriesamaximumtermofimprisonmentof10years,amaximumtermofsupervisedreleaseof3years,amaximumfine,pursuanttoTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,Section3571ofthegreatestof$250,000,twicethegrosspecuniarygainderivedfromtheoffense,ortwicethegrosspecuniarylosstopersonsotherthanthedefendantresultingfromtheoffense,anda$100mandatoryspecialassessment.
In
additiontotheforegoing,theCourtmustorderrestitutionasspecifiedbelow.ThetotalmaximumtermofimprisonmentonCountsOneandTwois20years.
In
considerationofthedefendant'spleatotheaboveoffenses,thedefendantwillnotbefurtherprosecutedcriminallybythisOffice(exceptforcriminaltaxviolationsastowhichthisOfficecannot,anddoesnot,makeanyagreement)forstealingproprietarysoftwarecodeownedbytheUnitedStatesDepartmentofTreasuryinoraboutJuly2011,andforsubmittingfalsedocumentstoimmigrationauthoritiesinsupportofothers'applicationsforvisastoenterandworkintheUnitedStatesfrominoraboutApril2011untilinoraboutJanuary2012,itbeingunderstoodthatthisagreementdoesnotbartheuseofsuchconductasapredicateactorasthebasisforasentencingenhancementinasubsequentprosecutionincluding,butnotlimitedto,aprosecutionpursuantto18
06.06.2011
 
U.S.C.§§1961
etseq.
Inaddition,atthetimeofsentencing,theGovernmentwillmovetodismissanyopenCount(s)againstthedefendant.Thedefendantagreesthatwithrespecttoanyandalldismissedchargeshe/sheisnota"prevailingparty"withinthemeaningofthe"HydeAmendment,"Section617,P.L.105-119(Nov.26,1997),andwillnotfileanyclaimunderthatlaw.ThedefendantherebyadmitstheforfeitureallegationswithrespecttoCountsOneandTwooftheInformationandagreestoforfeittotheUnitedStates,pursuanttoTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,Section981(a)(I)(C)andTitle28,UnitedStatesCode,Section2461,allproperty,realandpersonal,thatconstitutesorisderivedfromproceedstraceabletothecommissionoftheoffenseand,pursuanttoTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,Section982(a)(6),allconveyancesusedinthecommissionoftheviolation,allproperty,realandpersonal,thatconstitutesorisderivedfromoristraceabletoproceedsobtaineddirectlyorindirectlyfromthecommissionoftheoffense,andallproperty,realorpersonal,thatwasusedtofacilitate,orwasintendedtobeusedtofacilitate,thecommissionoftheoffense.
It
isfurtherunderstoodthatanyforfeitureofthedefendant'sassetsshallnotbetreatedassatisfactionofanyfine,restitution,costofimprisonment,oranyotherpenaltytheCourtmayimposeuponhiminadditiontoforfeiture.ThedefendantfurtheragreestomakerestitutioninanamountorderedbytheCourt.
In
considerationoftheforegoingandpursuanttoUnitedStatesSentencingGuidelines("U.S.S.G."or"Guidelines")Section6B1.4,thepartiesherebystipulatetothefollowing:A.OffenseLevelGroupingAnalysis:1.PursuanttoU.S.S.G.§3Dl.2,CountsOneandTwoconstituteseparategroupsbecausetheydonotinvolvesubstantiallythesameharm.Group1-Count1:2.PursuanttoU.S.S.G.§2B1.1(a)(2),thebaseoffenselevelfortheGroupis6.3.PursuanttoU.S.S.G.§2Bl.l(b)(1)(A)thereisnoincreaseinoffenselevelbecausethelossassociatedwiththeoffenseis$5,000orless.4.
In
accordancewiththeabove,theapplicableGuidelinesoffenselevelforCountOneandGroup1is6.Group2-Count2:5.PursuanttoU.S.S.G.§2L2.1(a)(I),thebaseoffenselevelfortheGroupis11.
06.06.2011
2
 
6.PursuanttoU.S.S.G.§2L2.l(b)(2),thereisanincreaseof3levelsbecausetheoffenseinvolvedbetween6-24documents.7.
In
accordancewiththeabove,theapplicableGuidelinesoffenselevelforCountTwoandGroup2is14.CombinedOffenseLevel:8.PursuanttoUS.S.G.§3D1.4,thecombinedoffenselevelis15,becausetheoffenselevelapplicabletotheGroupwiththehighestoffenselevelis14,theoffenselevelapplicabletotheotherGroupisbetweenSand8levelslessseriousand,accordingly,thereare1
liz
units.9.Assumingthedefendantclearlydemonstratesacceptanceofresponsibility,tothesatisfactionoftheGovernment,throughhisallocutionandsubsequentconductpriortotheimpositionofsentence,atwo-levelreductionwillbewarranted,pursuanttoU.S.S.G.§3El.l(a).Inaccordancewiththeabove,theapplicableGuidelinesoffenselevelis13.
B.
CriminalHistoryCategoryBasedupontheinformationnowavailabletothisOffice(includingrepresentationsbythedefense),thedefendanthas0criminalhistorypoints.Inaccordancewiththeabove,thedefendant'sCriminalHistoryCategoryis
1.
C.SentencingRangeBaseduponthecalculations,setforthabove,thedefendant'sstipulatedGuidelinesrangeis12to18months(the"StipulatedGuidelinesRange").
In
addition,afterdeterminingthedefendant'sabilitytopay,theCourtmayimposeafinepursuanttoU.S.S.G.§SEl.2.AtGuidelineslevel13,theapplicablefinerangeis$3,000to$30,000.ThepartiesagreethatneitheradownwardnoranupwarddeparturefromtheStipulatedGuidelinesRangesetforthaboveiswarranted.Accordingly,neitherpartywillseekanydepartureoradjustmentpursuanttotheGuidelinesthatisnotsetforthherein.NorwilleitherpartysuggestthattheProbationOfficeconsidersuchadepartureoradjustmentundertheGuidelines,orsuggestthattheCourt
suasponte
consideranysuchdepartureoradjustment.ThepartiesagreethateitherpartymayseekasentenceoutsideoftheStipulatedGuidelinesRange,suggestthattheProbationOfficeconsiderasentenceoutsideoftheStipulatedGuidelinesRange,andsuggestthattheCourt
suasponte
considerasentenceoutsideoftheStipulated
06.06.2011
3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->