____________No.____________I
N
T
HE
Supreme Court of Georgia
————
Cody Robert Judy,
Petitioner
,v.Barrack ObamaBrian Kemp
Respondent(s)
————
Discretionary Application for Review /or/ Certification of Federal Question of Law
From the Superior Court of Georgia for the County of Fulton, Docket number2012CV211398, reviewing the decision of the Georgia Office of StateAdministrative Hearings Docket number 1215136-60
———
CODY ROBERT JUDYPro se
Petitioner
3031 So. Ogden Ave.Suite 2Ogden, UT. 84403www.codyjudy.us(801)497-6655codyjudy@hotmail.com
MICHAEL JABLONSKI
Counsel of Record for
BARACK OBAMA260 Brighton Road NE Atlanta, GA.30309-1523 404- 290-2977michael.jablonski@comcast.netCAM-ANH LE Crt. of State acting as
Counsel of Record for
BRIAN KEMPVINCENT ROBERT RUSSOExecutive Office 214 State CapitalAtlanta GA. 30334cale@sos.ga.gov, vrusso@sos.ga.gov
ii
I.
QUESTIONS OF LAW THAT MIGHT BE DECIDED:
1-
Question
–
Are or should the respective State Political [ Democratic] Parties and theFederal Elections Commission [be] bound to the candidate office qualifications specifiedand demanded by the United States Constitution, based upon the State and Federal fundsused by such organizations promoting membership and public trust in State Primaries andGeneral Elections, as they are currently bullying Primary Elections by certifications of Constitutionally unqualified candidates to Secretaries of State; and should the Secretary
of State‘s not also be bound to the Constitution upon their oaths‘ and the public trust to
secure in this case Federal elections, to diligently prohibit unqualified candidates fromgetting on the Ballot in Primaries expressing preference of candidates for electorates tochampion who may not be qualified to the
Republic‘s peril?
2-
Question - Is Respondent candidate Mr. Barack Obama eligible for the Office of
President according to the United States Constitution‘s demands for a ‗
natural borncitizen
‘, with self revealed documented foreign allegiances of natural identity on his
released long form birth certificate, also reported as constituting probable cause for fraudand forgery by Sheriff law enforcement agencies Cold Case Posse to the Superior Court,by F.E.C. 2012 Registered Democratic Candidate for President Cody Robert Judy, whomalso disputed candidate R.-
AZ. Sen. McCain‘s and D. Ill. Sen. Obama‘s qualifications in
2008, asserting the harm of constitutional unfairness through campaign expenditures, andcontributions to the unqualified candidate(s)
in the publics‘ trust of the State Primaries
and General Elections of 2012?
3-
Question -
Does evidence provided to the Court by Petitioner of a Sheriff LawEnforcement Report constituting probable cause of fraud and forgery of Candidate
Barack Obama‘s identity papers for qualification of the Office of President castingreasonable doubt on candidate‘s qualifications, if avoided by the Court, not constitute
reprisal grounds for the release and pardon of all convicted of similar crimes for equalJustice under the law?
iii
II.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Mr. Cody Robert Judy, qualified and registered F.E.C., Candidate for U.S.President in the Democratic Party in harmony with Dec 22
nd
2011 findings of the
1
Federal 9
th
Circuit Court of Appeals which recognized standing precedent in theeligibility arena of the demands of the Constitution for the office of President, in
Barnett v. Obama
1
,and also a voter under
O.C.G.A. § 21-2-6 stating
“
any voter
”
eligible to votefor such candidate may challenge the qualifications of a candidate, has appealed toAdministrative Courts in New Hampshire and Georgia and State appeal Courts respectfullyciting disqualifying factors as evidence released by Barack Obama in contrast to qualification
demands of the Constitution for the Office of the President for a ‗natural born citizen‘ thathave been circumvented in candidate Barack Obama‘s instance by the Democratic Party, the
lower c
ourts, and State Secretaries to the Republic‘s peril and the hurt of his campaign for
President in ballot inclusion, campaign expenditures, and contributions made to an illegal
candidate which might have otherwise been given to his campaign. Mr. Judy‘s evi
denceshave included expert witnesses and law enforcement investigations and come to the Court intime and ripeness with 5 months left before the September 2012 National Democratic Party
convention, that its ‗supervisory powers‘ might alter lower court dec
isions discrepant with
precedent and the U.S. Constitution‘s demands meriting review.
________________________________
1
(Even the political candidates who lost to Obama in 2008 would only have had standing to sue if they hadfiled their complaint alleging unfair competition from an ineligible candidate before the election, the 9thCircuit judges said.) (The court said, and the defeated candidates "cannot claim competitive standingbecause they were no longer candidates when they filed their complaint."
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Judy v. Obama - Discretionary Application for Review - Georgia Supreme Court
This is a Discretionary Application for Review directed toward the Georgia Supreme Court appealing the Superior Court and Administrative Court decisions written by Cody Robert Judy pro se.
1.4K
Reads
4
Readcasts
0
Embed Views
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
