Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Network configuration Cell coverage Comparison of half power beam widths Vertical downtilt Mechanical downtilt Electrical downtilt Adjustable electrical downtilt
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Uplink frequencies :
Uplink Connection
GSM 900 : 890 - 915 MHz GSM 1800 : 1710 - 1785 MHz
Mobile Station
2
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Cell coverage To avoid interferences to adjacent cells the target is to provide coverage just for the concerning sector but not beyond the sector border tools for cell matching half power beam width tilt of the vertical pattern
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Which half power beam width is needed to cover a 120 sector ? standard comparison indicates significant differences at the sector borders 65 90 105 120 mistake : gain variation is not considered
5
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
antennas with the same vertical length but different horizontal half power beam width differ in the overall gain value example : 900 MHz / 1.3m length 65 15.5 dBi 90 14.0 dBi 105 13.5 dBi 120 13.0 dBi result : no significant difference between 90, 105 and 120 regarding half power beam width and overlapping area to the adjacent cell
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Conclusion : the range of half power beam widths can be limited to 65 and 90
field of application : urban areas : 65 Theoretically the overlapping area between the cells is too small. But due to reflections from the surrounding the half power beam width is increased. rural areas : 90 (65) Reflection intensity is much lower. Therefore many network planners prefer 90 to provide sufficient overlapping. But also 65 is used
7
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
a mechanical downtilt kit increases the upper distance to the mast and makes the antenna pointing down the requested downtilt angle is achieved only in main direction at +/- 90 from the main direction the downtilt angle is always zero (rotation axis) effective downtilt varies across the azimuth
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Mechanical Downtilt 0 6 8 10 effect on the horizontal pattern at the horizon : reduction of the fieldstrength in main direction without any change +/- 90 to it results in deformation of the horizontal pattern this effect of changing half power beam width can hardly be considered in the network planning and reduces the prediction accuracy
Horizontal pattern 105 / mechanical DT
10
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
11
12 downtilt
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Electrical Downtilt : 0 6 8 10 the fixed phase distribution applies to all azimuth directions electrical downtilt angle is constant the shape of the horizontal pattern remains constant accurate network planning is assured
12
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
13 Bild Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
14
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
6dB point
6dB point
3 9
The selected downtilt angle is linked to the respective vertical half power beam width. A greater vertical half power beam width means a higher downtilt angle in order to receive similar results.
15
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Max. power reduction towards the horizon is achieved with the first null. A higher downtilt angle increases the power again due to the first upper sidelobe. Max. DT angle is determined by the angle between the mainlobe and the first sidelobe .
16
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02
Special Cases
In general: Adjustable electrical downtilt is normally used for coverage fine tuning.
In special cases, i.e. antenna mounting on high rise buildings or in special test scenarios, a higher downtilt angle could be stipulated.
In this cases, an acceptable compromise is to combine electrical and mechanical DT mechanical downtilt kit : primary downtilting adjustable electrical downtilt : fine tuning
17
Kathrein/Scholz 07/02