HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)

Executive Summary of QWL
"Quality of Working Life" extent to which employees can enhance their personal lives through their work environment and experiences.
Quality of working life has been differentiated from the broader concept of quality of life. To some degree, this may be overly simplistic, concluded that quality of work performance is affected by quality of life as well as quality of working life.
Whilst quality of life has been more widely studied, quality of working life remains relatively unexplored and unexplained. A review of the literature reveals relatively little on quality of working life.
It is argued that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts as regards quality of working life, and, therefore, the failure to attend to the bigger picture may lead to the failure of interventions which tackle only one aspect. A clearer understanding of the inter-relationship of the various facets of quality of working life offers the opportunity for improved analysis of cause and effect in the workplace.
This consideration of quality of working Life as the greater context for various factors in the workplace, such as job satisfaction and stress, may offer opportunity for more cost-effective interventions in the workplace. The effective targeting of stress reduction, for example, may otherwise prove a hopeless task for employers pressured to take action to meet the requirements.
Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli
Topic of the study:

"A Study on Quality Work Life of Small Scale Industry with reference to HRM"
Objectives of the study: To review & explain QWL concepts & to analyze how this QWL benefits small scale industries.
To reveal various socio-economic background of employees working in small scale industry.
To identify various factors effecting quality of work life of employees working in industries.
To identify important factors effecting QWL when employees are grouped on the basis of personal, job related & organizational profiles.
To compare the position of different factors effecting QWL when they are grouped on personal, job related & organizational profiles.
Findings:
It was found that 19% of the workers agree that they are aware of health in spite of the nature of job, 8% strongly agree. It was found 19% of the workers agree that the energy & time spent on the job does not affect their life adversely.
It was found that 12% of workers agree for getting opportunities for improvement of their job, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 5% strongly agree, 4% disagree.
Suggestions:
Minimum workers are getting opportunities for improving their job in the organization so the organization needs to take into consideration for improving the job opportunities of its workers. Acceptance level of the workers ideas to bring new changes in the organization is very low. So the organization needs to accept the ideas of the workers at some situations so as it will increase the work efficiency & leads to increase in the productivity.
Limitations:
As the information was collected during the working hours, the employees may have given biased answers in a hurry due to lack of time.
Due to time restriction vigor study could not be possible. Especially for the survey, based on employees they were busy in their routine work.
SHREESHAIL PAINTS
Sector: - Chemical & Chemical Industry Industry: - Paint manufacturing Company Name: - ShreeShail Paints
A paint manufacturing industry established September 1999. The small scale industry manufactures Decorative paints & powder paints for the interior and exterior walls. Shreeshail paint industry has distribution network all over Karnataka. Location: - Gokul Gram Industrial Area, Tarihal Road.
Owner of the Industry: - Mr. Girish Nalwade. Manager: Salesman: Mr. Onappa. Mr. Angadi Mr. Madhu
Major competitors of the industry are: Sony Paints Rajdhani paints Kwality paints Diana paints
Organization Chart
Owner
Manager
Salesman (A)
Salesman (B)
Workers
Workers
Products
Decorative Paints & Powder Paints :-
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
Research methodology is a method to solve a research problem systematically. It involves gathering data, use of statistical techniques, interpretations, and drawing the conclusions about the research data.
Data source Area of Research Research instrument Sample Unit Sampling method Sample Size Tool Used
Primary data (field survey) ShreeShail Paints Questionnaire. Workers of Shreeshail paints Convenience sampling method. 30 respondents. SPSS
Study Area Shreeshail Paints, Gokul, Gram, Industrial Area Tarihal.
Sampling Method The sampling method adopted is convenience sampling for the study of:-Quality of Work Life in the Industrial Estates.
Types of data used in study Primary Data:
Primary data is collected from the interview and discussion with the workers. The responses given during interaction with the employees are taken into consideration.
Secondary Data:
The major source of secondary or supporting data is Internet. The information on company profile is taken with the interaction with the Owner.
Sampling Size: 30 respondents of Shreeshail paints. Statistical Tools used to analysis the data: Used SPSS to make coding sheet and to prepare bar graphs.
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
3.
Nature of the Ownership of the unit Cumulative Frequency Valid Proprietary 30 Percent 100.0 Valid Percent 100.0 Percent 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that the nature of the ownership of the unit is purely proprietary.
10
5.
Nature of Sales Cumulative Frequency Valid Local 30 Percent 100.0 Valid Percent 100.0 Percent 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that the nature of sales is Local.
11
6.
Terms of employment Cumulative Frequency Valid Permanent staff Temporary with change of Daily work Total 24 6 30 Percent 80.0 20.0 100.0 Valid Percent 80.0 20.0 100.0 Percent 80.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that the permanent staffs are 24% & Temporary with chance of daily work are 6%.
12
7.
Nature of the Job Cumulative Frequency Valid Managerial Office supervisor Office employee Factory Worker Total 2 2 1 25 30 Percent 6.7 6.7 3.3 83.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 6.7 3.3 83.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 13.3 16.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that Managerial is 2%, office supervisor is 2%, office employee is 1 & factory workers are 25%.
13
9.
Gender Cumulative Frequency Valid Male Female Total 22 8 30 Percent 73.3 26.7 100.0 Valid Percent 73.3 26.7 100.0 Percent 73.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 22% of the respondents are Male & 8% are Females.
14
10.
Place Of Residence Cumulative Frequency Valid Rural Semi Urban area Urban area Total 18 4 8 30 Percent 60.0 13.3 26.7 100.0 Valid Percent 60.0 13.3 26.7 100.0 Percent 60.0 73.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 18% of the respondents come from Rural, 4% semi urban area, 8% from urban area.
15
11.
Number of dependence in the family Cumulative Frequency Valid 2 or less than 2 3 4 5 6 and above Total 2 11 9 3 5 30 Percent 6.7 36.7 30.0 10.0 16.7 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 36.7 30.0 10.0 16.7 100.0 Percent 6.7 43.3 73.3 83.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 11% of the respondents have 3 dependencies in the family, 9% have 4, 5% have 6 & above, 3% have 5, & 2% have 2 or less than 2 dependencies in the family.
16
12.
Religion Cumulative Frequency Valid Hindu 30 Percent 100.0 Valid Percent 100.0 Percent 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 30% of the respondents are from Hindu religion.
17
13.
Computer Knowledge Cumulative Frequency Valid Nil Little Average Total 26 2 2 30 Percent 86.7 6.7 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 86.7 6.7 6.7 100.0 Percent 86.7 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 26% of the respondents have Nil computer knowledge, 2% Little & 2% Average.
18
14.
Education Cumulative Frequency Valid Below SSLC SSLC Degree Total 18 7 5 30 Percent 60.0 23.3 16.7 100.0 Valid Percent 60.0 23.3 16.7 100.0 Percent 60.0 83.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 18% of the respondents Education are below SSLC, 7% SSLC, & 5% Degree.
19
15.
Membership in the trade union Cumulative Frequency Valid No Passive Total 24 6 30 Percent 80.0 20.0 100.0 Valid Percent 80.0 20.0 100.0 Percent 80.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 24% of the respondents do not have membership in the trade union, 6% are Passive.
20
17
Previous experience in other organization Cumulative Frequency Valid No Less than 5 years more than 10 years Total 24 5 1 30 Percent 80.0 16.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 80.0 16.7 3.3 100.0 Percent 80.0 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 24% of the respondents do not have experience in other organization, 5% have experience less than 5 years, 1% more than 10 years.
21
18.
Nature of Salary/Wages payment Cumulative Frequency Valid Monthly Weekly Total 24 6 30 Percent 80.0 20.0 100.0 Valid Percent 80.0 20.0 100.0 Percent 80.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 24% of the respondents have monthly salary, 6% weekly salary.
22
20.
Other sources of income Cumulative Frequency Valid Nil Business Total 28 2 30 Percent 93.3 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 93.3 6.7 100.0 Percent 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 28% of the respondents sources of income are Nil, 2% have business.
23
22.
Employment status of spouse Cumulative Frequency Valid Employed Not Employed N/A Total 6 22 2 30 Percent 20.0 73.3 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 20.0 73.3 6.7 100.0 Percent 20.0 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 22% of the respondents employee status of spouse is not employed, 6% employed, 2% N/A.
24
23.
Your political Involvement Cumulative Frequency Valid Active Passive No Involvement Total 1 4 25 30 Percent 3.3 13.3 83.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 13.3 83.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 16.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 25% of the respondents do not have political involvement, 4% have passive involvement, 1% active.
25
24.
Do you have saving Habit Cumulative Frequency Valid Yes No Total 14 16 30 Percent 46.7 53.3 100.0 Valid Percent 46.7 53.3 100.0 Percent 46.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of the respondents do not have saving habit, 14% have savings habit.
26
25.
Bank Account Holder Cumulative Frequency Valid Yes No Total 7 23 30 Percent 23.3 76.7 100.0 Valid Percent 23.3 76.7 100.0 Percent 23.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 23% of the respondents are not the bank account holders, 7% are bank account holders.
27
26.
Post office Savings Cumulative Frequency Valid Yes No Total 15 15 30 Percent 50.0 50.0 100.0 Valid Percent 50.0 50.0 100.0 Percent 50.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 15% of the respondents have post office savings & another 15% do not have post office savings.
28
27.
Capital market Investment Cumulative Frequency Valid Yes No Total 2 28 30 Percent 6.7 93.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 93.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 28% of the respondents do not have capital market investment & 2% have capital market investment.
29
28.
Life Insurance Cumulative Frequency Valid Yes No Total 11 19 30 Percent 36.7 63.3 100.0 Valid Percent 36.7 63.3 100.0 Percent 36.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the respondents do not have life insurance & 11% have Life insurance.
30
29.
Medical Insurance Cumulative Frequency Valid Yes No Total 13 17 30 Percent 43.3 56.7 100.0 Valid Percent 43.3 56.7 100.0 Percent 43.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 17% of the respondents do not have medical insurance & 13% have medical insurance.
31
30. (A)
Condition of House Cumulative Frequency Valid Electrified 30 Percent 100.0 Valid Percent 100.0 Percent 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 30% of the respondents condition of the house is electrified.
32
30. (B)
Condition of House Cumulative Frequency Valid Owned Rented Total 17 13 30 Percent 56.7 43.3 100.0 Valid Percent 56.7 43.3 100.0 Percent 56.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of the respondents have owned house & 13% rented house.
33
30. (C)
Condition of House Cumulative Frequency Valid Tached Tiled Asbestos sheet Concrete A Combination of Above Total 1 4 10 12 3 30 Percent 3.3 13.3 33.3 40.0 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 13.3 33.3 40.0 10.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 16.7 50.0 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 12% of the respondents house is concrete, 10% asbestos sheet, 4% tiled, 3% combination of all above & 1% tached house.
34
30. (D)
Condition of House Cumulative Frequency Valid With safety tank Latrine With ordinary Latrine With no Latrine Total 8 20 2 30 Percent 26.7 66.7 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 26.7 66.7 6.7 100.0 Percent 26.7 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 20% of the respondents have ordinary latrine, 8% with safety tank latrine, and 2% with no latrine.
35
31.
Ownership of the Household and personal assets Cumulative Frequency Valid Four wheeler Two wheeler By-cycle Land line Mobile phone Fridge Mixer/ Grinder Total 2 5 18 1 2 1 1 30 Percent 6.7 16.7 60.0 3.3 6.7 3.3 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 16.7 60.0 3.3 6.7 3.3 3.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 23.3 83.3 86.7 93.3 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 18% of the respondents have the ownership of Bycycle, 5% two wheeler, 2% four wheeler, 2% mobile phone, 1% fridge & 1% mixer/grinder.
36
31. (J)
Land Cumulative Frequency Valid Nil Up to 5 Cents 5-10 Cents 10-25 Cents 25 Cents to 1Acre More than 1 acre Total 6 3 11 5 3 2 30 Percent 20.0 10.0 36.7 16.7 10.0 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 20.0 10.0 36.7 16.7 10.0 6.7 100.0 Percent 20.0 30.0 66.7 83.3 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 11% of the respondents have 5-10 cents of Land, 6% Nil, 5% 10-25 cents, 3% 25 cents to 1 acre & 2% more than 1 acre.
37
32.
Infotainment ( Subscriber/Owner) Cumulative Frequency Valid English Daily trade and professional journal TV Radio Total 1 1 14 14 30 Percent 3.3 3.3 46.7 46.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 3.3 46.7 46.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 6.7 53.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% of the respondents have subscription of TV, 14% radio, 1% English daily, & 1% trade & professional journal.
38
33.
Drinking water source Cumulative Frequency Valid Own Well Neighbours Well Pipe connection Public tap Bore well Total 5 4 9 11 1 30 Percent 16.7 13.3 30.0 36.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 16.7 13.3 30.0 36.7 3.3 100.0 Percent 16.7 30.0 60.0 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 11% of the respondents drinking water source from public taps, 9% pipe connection, 5% own well, 4% neighbours well & 1% bore well.
39
34.
Hobbies Cumulative Frequency Valid Music Sport / Games Reading Painting Other Total 23 2 2 1 2 30 Percent 76.7 6.7 6.7 3.3 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 76.7 6.7 6.7 3.3 6.7 100.0 Percent 76.7 83.3 90.0 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 23% of the respondents Hobbies are music, 2% sports/games, 2% reading & 2% others.
40
1.
The organization is giving Fair salary/ Wages in comparison with cost of living Cumulative Frequency Valid Strongly Disagree No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly agree Total 1 1 22 6 30 Percent 3.3 3.3 73.3 20.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 3.3 73.3 20.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 6.7 80.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 22% of the respondents agree with the organizations fair salary in comparison with cost of living, 6% strongly agree, 1% strongly disagree.
41
2.
Compensation provided in your organization is better than other organizations Cumulative Frequency Valid Disagree No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 2 12 12 4 30 Percent 6.7 40.0 40.0 13.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 40.0 40.0 13.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 46.7 86.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 12% of the respondents said that compensation provided in their organization is better than other organizations, 12% no agreement or disagreement, 4% strongly agree, 2% disagree.
42
3.
Monetary benefits in comparison with your ability is fair Cumulative Frequency Valid No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 4 19 7 30 Percent 13.3 63.3 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 63.3 23.3 100.0 Percent 13.3 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of respondents agree with monetary benefits in comparison with their ability is fair, 7% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or disagreement.
43
4.
Your organization has a fair overtime wage/salary policy Cumulative Frequency Valid No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 4 19 7 30 Percent 13.3 63.3 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 63.3 23.3 100.0 Percent 13.3 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the respondents said they have fair overtime wage policy, 7% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or disagreement.
44
5.
You are getting fair incentives (bonus, festival allowance etc) from the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 13 14 3 30 Percent 43.3 46.7 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 43.3 46.7 10.0 100.0 Percent 43.3 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 14% of the respondents agree they are getting fair incentives, 13% no agreement or disagreement, 3% strongly agree.
45
6.
Your employer is paying good contribution to your PF Cumulative Frequency Valid Disagree No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 2 19 8 1 30 Percent 6.7 63.3 26.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 63.3 26.7 3.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 70.0 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the respondents are no agreement or disagreement for their employer paying good contribution to their PF, 8% agree, 2% disagree, 1% strongly agrees.
46
7.
You are satisfied with gratuity and group insurance scheme Cumulative Frequency Valid Disagree No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 3 18 8 1 30 Percent 10.0 60.0 26.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 10.0 60.0 26.7 3.3 100.0 Percent 10.0 70.0 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 18% of the respondents are no agreement or disagreement for the satisfactory with gratuity & group insurance scheme. 8% agree, 3% disagree, 1% strongly agree.
47
8.
Your employer may pay advance salaries/ wages as you required Cumulative Frequency Valid Strongly disagree disagree Agree Total 7 18 5 30 Percent 23.3 60.0 16.7 100.0 Valid Percent 23.3 60.0 16.7 100.0 Percent 23.3 83.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 18% of the respondents disagree for their employer may pay advance salary as they require, 7% strongly disagree, 5% agree.
48
9.
Your employer makes prompt payment of salary and wages Cumulative Frequency Valid Agree Strongly Agree Total 23 7 30 Percent 76.7 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 76.7 23.3 100.0 Percent 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 23% of the workers agree for their employer makes prompt payment of salary, 7% strongly agree.
49
10.
you will continue in the present job regardless of pay received from the present organization Cumulative Frequency Valid Strongly Disagree Disagree NO agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 14 4 3 7 2 30 Percent 46.7 13.3 10.0 23.3 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 46.7 13.3 10.0 23.3 6.7 100.0 Percent 46.7 60.0 70.0 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% of the workers strongly disagreed with continuing present job regardless of pay in the organization, 7% agree, 4% disagree, 3% no agreement or disagreement.
50
11.
you are getting adequate rest period Cumulative Frequency Valid No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 4 15 11 30 Percent 13.3 50.0 36.7 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 50.0 36.7 100.0 Percent 13.3 63.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 15% of the employee agrees with their adequate rest period, 11% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or disagreement.
51
12.
Good canteen facilities are available in the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid Strongly Disagree Disagree No agreement or Disagreement Agree Total 12 14 1 3 30 Percent 40.0 46.7 3.3 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 40.0 46.7 3.3 10.0 100.0 Percent 40.0 86.7 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% disagree with their canteen facilities available in the organization, 12% strongly disagree, 3% agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
52
13.
You have proper Drinking water facilities Cumulative Frequency Valid Agree Strongly Agree Total 16 14 30 Percent 53.3 46.7 100.0 Valid Percent 53.3 46.7 100.0 Percent 53.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of the workers agree with drinking water facilities, 14% strongly agree.
53
14.
There is good fist aid / medical facilities Cumulative Frequency Valid Agree Strongly Agree Total 10 20 30 Percent 33.3 66.7 100.0 Valid Percent 33.3 66.7 100.0 Percent 33.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 10% of workers agree with good medical facilities, 20% strongly agree.
54
15.
You are satisfied with sports & games facilities Cumulative Frequency Valid Strongly Disagree Disagree No agreement or Disagreement Agree Total 21 6 2 1 30 Percent 70.0 20.0 6.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 70.0 20.0 6.7 3.3 100.0 Percent 70.0 90.0 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 21% of the workers strongly disagree with sports & games facilities, 6% disagree, 2% no agreement or disagreement, & 1% agree.
55
16.
You are satisfied with library and reading room facilities Cumulative Frequency Valid Strongly Disagree Disagree No agreement or Disagreement Agree Total 14 13 2 1 30 Percent 46.7 43.3 6.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 46.7 43.3 6.7 3.3 100.0 Percent 46.7 90.0 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 14% of workers strongly disagree with library facilities, 13% disagree, 2% no agreement or disagreement & 1% agree.
56
17.
There is a good lunch room Cumulative Frequency Valid No agreement or Disagreement Agree Strongly Agree Total 19 10 1 30 Percent 63.3 33.3 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 63.3 33.3 3.3 100.0 Percent 63.3 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers are no agreement or disagreement with good lunch room, 10% agree, 1% strongly agree.
57
18.
You are satisfied with sanitary facilities Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree No agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 3 19 7 30 Percent 3.3 10.0 63.3 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 10.0 63.3 23.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 13.3 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers are satisfied with sanitary facilities, 7% strongly agree, 3% no agreement or disagreement, 1% disagree.
58
19.
Ventilation and air circulation facilities are fine Cumulative Frequency Valid agree strongly agree Total 17 13 30 Percent 56.7 43.3 100.0 Valid Percent 56.7 43.3 100.0 Percent 56.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of workers agree with ventilation & air circulation facilities, 13% strongly agree.
59
20.
There are good facilities for disposal of waste and dust. Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 20 8 30 Percent 6.7 66.7 26.7 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 66.7 26.7 100.0 Percent 6.7 73.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 20% of workers agree with good facilities for disposal of waste & dust, 8% strongly agree, 2% no agreement or disagreement.
60
21.
The organization is taking good measures for controlling pollution Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 21 8 30 Percent 3.3 70.0 26.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 70.0 26.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 73.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 21% of workers said organization is taking good measures for controlling pollution, 8% strongly agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
61
22.
Machines and equipments are in good working condition. Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 11 18 30 Percent 3.3 36.7 60.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 36.7 60.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 40.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 18% of workers strongly agree with good working condition with machines, 11% agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
62
23.
The organization has a good safety plan Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 22 6 30 Percent 6.7 73.3 20.0 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 73.3 20.0 100.0 Percent 6.7 80.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 22% of workers agree with good safety plan in organization, 6% strongly agree & 2% no agreement or disagreement.
63
24.
You are satisfied with the health care measures of the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 4 19 7 30 Percent 13.3 63.3 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 63.3 23.3 100.0 Percent 13.3 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers agree with the health care measures of the organization, 7% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or disagreement.
64
25.
You feel normal health after day's work Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement of disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 2 20 7 30 Percent 3.3 6.7 66.7 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 6.7 66.7 23.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 10.0 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 20% of employees agree that they feel normal health after days work, 7% strongly agree, 2% no agreement or disagreement, 1% disagree.
65
26.
Almost everyone knows who is working under whom Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement of disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 18 11 30 Percent 3.3 60.0 36.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 60.0 36.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 63.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 18% of the workers agree that everyone knows who is working under whom, 11% strongly agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
66
27.
Your ideas to bring new changes in the organization are appreciated. Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 7 16 3 3 30 Percent 3.3 23.3 53.3 10.0 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 23.3 53.3 10.0 10.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 26.7 80.0 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 16% of workers are no agreement or disagreement with their ideas to bring new changes in the organization, 7% disagree, 3% agree, & 1% strongly disagree.
67
28.
You are getting opportunities to participate in technical planning of your work. Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 3 10 9 6 2 30 Percent 10.0 33.3 30.0 20.0 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 10.0 33.3 30.0 20.0 6.7 100.0 Percent 10.0 43.3 73.3 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 10% of workers are disagree with getting opportunities to participate in technical planning work, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 6% agree, 3% strongly disagree, 2% strongly agree.
68
29.
You are getting adequate information about what is going on in your unit. Cumulative Frequency Valid agree strongly agree Total 21 9 30 Percent 70.0 30.0 100.0 Valid Percent 70.0 30.0 100.0 Percent 70.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 21% of workers agree for getting adequate information about what is going on in your unit, 9% strongly agree.
69
30.
You are getting enough freedom of taking decision for your job and implement them. Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 18 6 2 3 30 Percent 3.3 60.0 20.0 6.7 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 60.0 20.0 6.7 10.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 63.3 83.3 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 18% of workers disagree for not getting enough freedom of taking decision for your job & implementing, 6% no agreement or disagreement, 3% strongly agree, 2% agree.
70
31.
Your job provides you with meaningful information about work process and result. Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 17 9 3 30 Percent 3.3 56.7 30.0 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 56.7 30.0 10.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 60.0 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of workers are no agreement or disagreement for their job providing with meaningful information about work process, 9% agree, 3% strongly agree, 1% disagree.
71
32.
The organization facilitates the self improvement for member Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 4 19 6 1 30 Percent 13.3 63.3 20.0 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 63.3 20.0 3.3 100.0 Percent 13.3 76.7 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers are no agreement or disagreement with organization facilities for self improvement, 6% agree, 4% disagree, 1% strongly agrees.
72
33.
The supervisor does not exercise unreasonable pressure on employees Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree Total 1 1 28 30 Percent 3.3 3.3 93.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 3.3 93.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 6.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 28% of workers said their supervisor does not exercise unreasonable pressure on employees, 1% no agreement or disagreement, 1% disagree.
73
34.
Equitable treatment is given to all workers in the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 19 10 30 Percent 3.3 63.3 33.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 63.3 33.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 66.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers agree with equitable treatment is given to all workers, 10% strongly agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
74
35.
Your work in organization is well appreciated Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 6 15 7 30 Percent 6.7 20.0 50.0 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 20.0 50.0 23.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 26.7 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 15% of workers work is well appreciated in the organization, 7% strongly agree, 6% no agreement or disagreement, 2% disagree.
75
36.
Work is assigned to employees on the basis of their abilities Cumulative Frequency Valid Strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement Agree strongly agree Total 1 17 7 4 1 30 Percent 3.3 56.7 23.3 13.3 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 56.7 23.3 13.3 3.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 60.0 83.3 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of workers disagree with the work assigned to employees on the basis of their abilities, 7% no agreement or disagreement, 4% agree, 1% strongly agree.
76
37.
Your work involves organizational planning, research & development Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 16 1 11 1 30 Percent 3.3 53.3 3.3 36.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 53.3 3.3 36.7 3.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 56.7 60.0 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of workers disagree with their work involves planning, R&D, 11% agree, 1% strongly agree, 1% strongly disagree.
77
38.
Your work is not too much challenging but within the limits of your ability Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 4 23 3 30 Percent 13.3 76.7 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 76.7 10.0 100.0 Percent 13.3 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 23% of workers agree that the work is not too much challenging but with limits of their ability, 3% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or disagreement.
78
39.
There are facilities & opportunities for individual creative work in the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree Total 1 12 11 6 30 Percent 3.3 40.0 36.7 20.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 40.0 36.7 20.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 43.3 80.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 12% disagree with opportunities for individual creative work in the organization, 11% no agreement or disagreement, 6% agree, 1% strongly disagrees.
79
40.
You expect that you could use newly acquired knowledge for further work assignment Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 7 12 10 1 30 Percent 23.3 40.0 33.3 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 23.3 40.0 33.3 3.3 100.0 Percent 23.3 63.3 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 12% of workers no agreement or disagreement that they could use newly acquired knowledge for further work assignment, 10% agree, 7% disagree, 1% strongly agree.
80
41.
You are getting opportunities for improvement of your job Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 4 9 12 5 30 Percent 13.3 30.0 40.0 16.7 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 30.0 40.0 16.7 100.0 Percent 13.3 43.3 83.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 12% of workers agree for getting opportunities for improvement of their job, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 5% strongly agree, 4% disagree.
81
42.
You are getting proper training before assigning a new job Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 3 6 14 7 30 Percent 10.0 20.0 46.7 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 10.0 20.0 46.7 23.3 100.0 Percent 10.0 30.0 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% of workers agree for getting proper training before assigning a new job, 7% strongly agree, 6% no agreement or disagreement, 3% disagree.
82
43.
You are enjoying job rotation for avoiding monotony Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 9 9 10 2 30 Percent 30.0 30.0 33.3 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 30.0 30.0 33.3 6.7 100.0 Percent 30.0 60.0 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 10% of workers agree for their job rotation for avoiding monotony, 9% disagree, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 2% strongly agree.
83
44.
You are satisfied with promotion opportunities in your organization Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 6 16 5 3 30 Percent 20.0 53.3 16.7 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 20.0 53.3 16.7 10.0 100.0 Percent 20.0 73.3 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of the workers no agreement or disagreement for promotion opportunities in the organization, 6% disagree, 5% agree, 3% strongly agree.
84
45.
Performance appraisal in the organization are based on objective assessment & not based on favoritism Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 6 17 6 1 30 Percent 20.0 56.7 20.0 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 20.0 56.7 20.0 3.3 100.0 Percent 20.0 76.7 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 17% of workers no agreement or disagreement of performance appraisal in the organization based on objective not on favoritism, 6% agree, 6% disagree, 1% strongly agrees.
85
46.
The idea of employees to bring new changes in the organization is appreciated Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree Total 8 16 6 30 Percent 26.7 53.3 20.0 100.0 Valid Percent 26.7 53.3 20.0 100.0 Percent 26.7 80.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of workers no agreement or disagreement for their ideas to bring new changes in the organization is appreciated, 8% disagree, 6% agree.
86
47.
You believe that you will have job in the present organization till the retirement age Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 17 9 3 30 Percent 3.3 56.7 30.0 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 56.7 30.0 10.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 60.0 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of the workers no agreement or disagreement that they will have job in the organization tills the retirement, 9% agree, 3% strongly agree.
87
48.
All the members of the work organization have the sense of one community Cumulative Frequency Valid agree strongly agree Total 16 14 30 Percent 53.3 46.7 100.0 Valid Percent 53.3 46.7 100.0 Percent 53.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of the workers agree for the members of the work organization have the sense of one community, 14% strongly agree.
88
49.
You identify yourself as member of the organization on the basis of skill & potentialities without regard of race, sex, age etc Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 10 14 3 3 30 Percent 33.3 46.7 10.0 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 33.3 46.7 10.0 10.0 100.0 Percent 33.3 80.0 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 14% of workers no agreement or disagreement for identifying in the organization on the basis of skill & potentialities, 10% disagree, 3% agree, 3% strongly.
89
50.
Members of the work organization interact in terms of ideas & feelings Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 8 13 6 3 30 Percent 26.7 43.3 20.0 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent 26.7 43.3 20.0 10.0 100.0 Percent 26.7 70.0 90.0 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 13% of workers no agreement or disagreement with interaction in terms of ideas & feelings, 8% disagree, 6% agree, 3% strongly agree.
90
51.
"Working in a group" is no problem here. Cumulative Frequency Valid agree strongly agree Total 5 25 30 Percent 16.7 83.3 100.0 Valid Percent 16.7 83.3 100.0 Percent 16.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 25% of workers strongly agree for working in a group is no problem, 5% agree.
91
52.
You prefer to accomplish the work collectively than individually Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 16 10 2 30 Percent 6.7 53.3 33.3 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 53.3 33.3 6.7 100.0 Percent 6.7 60.0 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of workers no agreement or disagreement for accomplishing work collectively than individually, 10% agree, 2% strongly agree, 2% disagree.
92
53.
You think that members of senior staff pay attention to grievance of the junior staff. Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 16 9 4 1 30 Percent 53.3 30.0 13.3 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 53.3 30.0 13.3 3.3 100.0 Percent 53.3 83.3 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 16% of workers disagree for members of senior staff pay attention to grievances of junior staff, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 4% agree, 1% strongly agree.
93
54.
Your views are take into account in resolving working problems Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 24 1 2 2 30 Percent 3.3 80.0 3.3 6.7 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 80.0 3.3 6.7 6.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 83.3 86.7 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 24% of workers disagree for their views taking in resolving working problems, 2% agree, 2% strongly agree, 1% strongly disagree.
94
55.
Your organization encourages reciprocal help Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree Total 1 3 10 16 30 Percent 3.3 10.0 33.3 53.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 10.0 33.3 53.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 13.3 46.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 16% of workers agree for their organization encourages reciprocal help, 10% no agreement or disagreement, 3% disagree, 1% strongly disagree.
95
56.
The workers does not oppose adoption of rapid changes in technology in the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 27 2 30 Percent 3.3 90.0 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 90.0 6.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 27% of workers agree that they do not oppose adoption of rapid changes in technology in organization, 2% strongly agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
96
57.
Workers always welcome expansion & diversification in operation Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 18 9 1 30 Percent 6.7 60.0 30.0 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 60.0 30.0 3.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 66.7 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 18% of workers no agreement or disagreement for expansion & diversification in operation, 9% agree, 2% disagree, 1% strongly agree.
97
58.
You are getting opportunities to participate in decisions making that affect the workers Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 20 3 4 1 30 Percent 6.7 66.7 10.0 13.3 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 66.7 10.0 13.3 3.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 73.3 83.3 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 20% of workers disagree in decision making that affect the workers, 4% agree, 2% strongly disagree, 1% strongly agree.
98
59.
The superiors consult you before making any major decision in the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 3 20 1 5 1 30 Percent 10.0 66.7 3.3 16.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 10.0 66.7 3.3 16.7 3.3 100.0 Percent 10.0 76.7 80.0 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 20% of workers disagree for superior consulting them before decision making, 5% agree, 3% strongly disagree, 1% strongly agree.
99
60.
The relation between co-workers in your organization is good Cumulative Frequency Valid agree strongly agree Total 11 19 30 Percent 36.7 63.3 100.0 Valid Percent 36.7 63.3 100.0 Percent 36.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers strongly agree for the relation between co-workers is good, 11% agree.
100
61.
The relation between superiors and subordinates is fine Cumulative Frequency Valid agree strongly agree Total 11 19 30 Percent 36.7 63.3 100.0 Valid Percent 36.7 63.3 100.0 Percent 36.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers strongly agree for the relation between superiors & subordinates is fine, 11% agree.
101
62.
There is good relation between management & workers Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 9 20 30 Percent 3.3 30.0 66.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 30.0 66.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 33.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 20% of workers strongly agree for good relation between management & workers, 9% agree, 1% no agreement or disagreement.
102
63.
Your organization takes care for the welfare of workers of all ages Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 19 9 30 Percent 6.7 63.3 30.0 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 63.3 30.0 100.0 Percent 6.7 70.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 19% of workers agree that the organization takes care for the welfare of workers of all the ages, 9% strongly agree, 2% no agreement or disagreement.
103
64.
You receive equal treatment in all maters like employees compensation, job security etc Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 5 17 7 30 Percent 3.3 16.7 56.7 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 16.7 56.7 23.3 100.0 Percent 3.3 20.0 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 17% of workers agree for equal treatment in all matters like job security etc, 7% strongly agree, 5% no agreement or disagreement, 1% disagree.
104
65.
your organization does no believe that "there is only one best way for everyone. Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree Total 1 19 5 5 30 Percent 3.3 63.3 16.7 16.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 63.3 16.7 16.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 66.7 83.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers disagree for organization does not believe there is one way for everyone, 5% no agreement or disagreement, 5% agree. 1% strongly disagree.
105
66.
You can maintain your privacy regarding personal matters in the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree agree strongly agree Total 1 14 15 30 Percent 3.3 46.7 50.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 46.7 50.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 50.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 15% of workers strongly agree for maintaining privacy of personal matter in organization, 14% agree, 1% disagree.
106
67.
A well functioning conflict resolution mechanism is there in the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 15 12 1 30 Percent 6.7 50.0 40.0 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 50.0 40.0 3.3 100.0 Percent 6.7 56.7 96.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 15% of workers no agreement or disagreement for a well functioning conflict resolution mechanism in the organization, 12% agree, 2% disagree, 1% strongly agree.
107
68.
Your job satisfying your needs in general on the job Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 1 20 8 30 Percent 3.3 3.3 66.7 26.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 3.3 66.7 26.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 6.7 73.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 20% of workers agree for job satisfaction need in general on the job, 8% strongly agree, 1% disagree.
108
69.
you are always aware of your health in spite of the nature of your job Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 2 19 8 30 Percent 3.3 6.7 63.3 26.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 6.7 63.3 26.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 10.0 73.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 19% of the workers agree that they are aware of health in spite of the nature of job, 8% strongly agree, 1% disagree.
109
70.
Your social & individual requirements are not neglected in the organization Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 4 19 6 30 Percent 3.3 13.3 63.3 20.0 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 13.3 63.3 20.0 100.0 Percent 3.3 16.7 80.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 19% of the workers agree that their social requirements are not neglected in the organization, 6% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or disagreement, 1% disagrees.
110
71.
The energy & time spent on the job does not effect your life adversely Cumulative Frequency Valid no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 4 19 7 30 Percent 13.3 63.3 23.3 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 63.3 23.3 100.0 Percent 13.3 76.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of the workers agree that the energy & time spent on the job does not affect their life adversely, 7% strongly agree, 4% no agreement or disagreement.
111
72.
Your organization functions as a socially responsible unit Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree Total 2 3 17 8 30 Percent 6.7 10.0 56.7 26.7 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 10.0 56.7 26.7 100.0 Percent 6.7 16.7 73.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 17% of workers no agreement or disagreement that the organization functions as a social responsible unit, 8% agree, 3% disagree, 2% strongly disagree.
112
73.
Your job does not lower your social prestige Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 1 22 5 30 Percent 6.7 3.3 73.3 16.7 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 3.3 73.3 16.7 100.0 Percent 6.7 10.0 83.3 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 22% of the workers agree that their job does not lower their social prestige, 5% strongly agree, 2% disagree.
113
74.
Your job have improved social security scheme Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 4 19 4 2 30 Percent 3.3 13.3 63.3 13.3 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 13.3 63.3 13.3 6.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 16.7 80.0 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers no agreement or disagreement for their job have improved social security scheme, 4% agree, 4% disagree, 2% strongly agree, 1% strongly disagree.
114
75.
Your organization is not too much production oriented Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree Total 1 24 3 2 30 Percent 3.3 80.0 10.0 6.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 80.0 10.0 6.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 83.3 93.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 24% of workers disagree for stating that organization is not too much production oriented, 3% no agreement or disagreement, 2% agree, 1% strongly disagree.
115
76.
Your work life matches the social life you lead Cumulative Frequency Valid agree strongly agree Total 21 9 30 Percent 70.0 30.0 100.0 Valid Percent 70.0 30.0 100.0 Percent 70.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 21% of workers agree for their life matches the social life they lead, 9% strongly agree.
116
77.
Your organization is aware of the method of industrial pollution Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree agree strongly agree Total 1 9 20 30 Percent 3.3 30.0 66.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 30.0 66.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 33.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 20% of workers strongly agree for their organization is aware of the method of industrial pollution, 9% agree, 1% disagree.
117
78.
The prices charged for the good & services by your organization are reasonable from social point of view Cumulative Frequency Valid agree strongly agree Total 11 19 30 Percent 36.7 63.3 100.0 Valid Percent 36.7 63.3 100.0 Percent 36.7 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 19% of workers strongly agree for the prices charged for the good by organization are reasonable from social point of view, & 11% agree.
118
79.
Your organization give due importance to quality of good & services Cumulative Frequency Valid strongly disagree disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 2 16 2 1 9 30 Percent 6.7 53.3 6.7 3.3 30.0 100.0 Valid Percent 6.7 53.3 6.7 3.3 30.0 100.0 Percent 6.7 60.0 66.7 70.0 100.0
Interpretation: - From the above graph 16% of workers disagree stating that their organization gives due importance to quality of goods, 9% strongly agree, 2% no agreement or disagreement, 2% disagree.
119
80.
Your organization is contributing toward the improvement of the culture of the society Cumulative Frequency Valid disagree no agreement or disagreement agree strongly agree Total 1 11 13 5 30 Percent 3.3 36.7 43.3 16.7 100.0 Valid Percent 3.3 36.7 43.3 16.7 100.0 Percent 3.3 40.0 83.3 100.0
Interpretation: - The above graph reveals that 13% of workers agree that the organization is contributing toward the improvement of the culture of the society, 11% no agreement or disagreement, 5% strongly agree, 1% disagree.
120
Findings:
It was found that 18% of the respondents Education are below SSLC, 7% SSLC, & 5%
Degree.
It was found that 16% of the respondents do not have saving habit, 14% have savings
habit.
It was found that 17% of the respondents do not have medical insurance & 13% have
medical insurance. It was found that 19% of the workers agree that they are aware of health in spite of the nature of job, 8% strongly agree. It was found 19% of the workers agree that the energy & time spent on the job does not affect their life adversely. It was found that 12% of workers agree for getting opportunities for improvement of their job, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 5% strongly agree, 4% disagree. It was found that 10% of workers agree for their job rotation for avoiding monotony, 9% disagree, 9% no agreement or disagreement, 2% strongly agree. It was found that 17% of workers no agreement or disagreement of performance appraisal in the organization based on objective not on favoritism.
It was found that 22% of the respondents agree with the organizations fair salary in comparison with cost of living.
121
Suggestions:
Some of the following suggestions we would like to give based on the analysis.
The savings habit of the workers is poor & low so the organization has to help the workers in improving their savings by providing life insurance, medical insurance etc. Organization should not give too much of work stress to the workers so as it might affects the life of the workers adversely. Minimum workers are getting opportunities for improving their job in the organization so the organization needs to take into consideration for improving the job opportunities of its workers. Acceptance level of the workers ideas to bring new changes in the organization is very low. So the organization needs to accept the ideas of the workers at some situations so as it will increase the work efficiency & leads to increase in the productivity. Only least amount of workers enjoying job rotation for avoiding monotony. So the organization has to keep in mind that the job rotation should not lead to work repetitiveness.
122
Conclusion:
From the survey it is cleared that the Quality of work life of the workers in the organization is up to the satisfaction level. But still there are some Criterias to be fade out.
There are limited opportunities for the workers in the organization which will leads to the hurdle in enhancing the improvement of their job. In order to retain the workers & work efficiency, the organization has to recognize the views of the workers, & provide opportunities for growth, development & security etc.
Organization has to improve the socio economic conditions of the workers so as to increase the morale of the workers. Quality of better work performance will ultimately lead to the Quality of better life.
123

HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

HRD Mini Project (Shreeshail Paints)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Executive Summary of QWL

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Topic of the study:

To reveal various socio-economic background of employees working in small scale industry.

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Decorative Paints & Powder Paints :-

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Study Area Shreeshail Paints, Gokul, Gram, Industrial Area Tarihal.

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Types of data used in study Primary Data:

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli

Institute of Excellence in Management Science, Hubli