Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I N N O V AT I O N
E C O N O MI C S
ALEX HARYOWISENO FUTURE CHRISTCHURCH: STRATEGIES TO ECONOMIC RECOVERY
2 Future Christchurch | Innovation Economy
1. Innovation Economics
1.4. Perceived Barriers to Developing
Innovation culture
1.2. Connective Structure
1.3. Commercialization as a form of Knowledge
transfer
1.1. Innovation through the Built
Environment
Thesis Framework
Thesis Statement
2. Creating a Culture Based on
Innovation
2.1. New Zealand Within the Global Context
2.2. NZs Market Orientation
2.3. Christchurchs Industry Profile
2.4. Conclusion: Creating Innovation
Culture
_______________5
_______________6
_______________8
_______________9
_______________9
_______________9
_______________9
_______________10
_________10
______________14
_______________11
______________15
Table of Contents
3 Alex Haryowiseno
3.1. Sector Priorities
3. Fostering Connectivity & an
Innovation Ecosystem
3.2. A Measure of Innovation
3.3. An Overview of NZs Innovation Landscape
3.4. An Overview of Policies
3.5 Overseas models
3.6 Conclusion: Fostering Connectivity and an
Innovation Ecosystem
4. Educated Workforce
5. Urban & Building Design
______________16
______________16
______________17
________18
______________28
______________30
______________31
Table of Contents
______________32
______________34
4.1. The Importance of generating
an Educated Workforce ______________32
4.1. Graduate Concentrations
in Canterbury Universities ______________33
4 Future Christchurch | Innovation Economy
5 Alex Haryowiseno
6 Future Christchurch | Innovation Economy
Innovation Economics
The Innovation Economics doctrine is a theory
that puts the importance of technological
development and transfer of knowledge at
the centre of a nations economic growth.
Knowledge and its subsequent products are
seen as important factors alongside traditional
primary commodities, and have shifted from
being seen as independent forces unafected by
policies, to being a driving force that promotes
productivity and better use of resources.
The two key questions to be asked when
considering this are: Why should New Zealand
consider adopting this thinking into its
economic development strategy? And what is
this theorys signifcance in terms of creating a
strategy for Christchurchs recovery?
New Zealands orientation towards the primary
industries is widely known, with its agriculture
products as the countrys top export income
generators. The country has achieved this by
also associating these products with its clean
and green image. However, this reliance on
the exploit of natural resources has resulted
in the countrys inability to reverse the decline
in its prosperity since the 1970s, as seen in its
current position within the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD). Sitting at 22nd out of the 33 registered
countries, New Zealand falls short in terms of
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita
compared to the average OECD mark, as well
as countries such as Australia.
New Zealand currently generates $29,800
GDP per capita, 35% behind Australia and 20%
below the OECD average standard. One of
the key reasons for New Zealands decline in
GDP is the persistence of intense labour and
low-impact jobs. It is recorded that NZ workers
put in as much as 15% more working hours and
generate 20% less returns when compared to
the OECD average. In order to just maintain
this current position, New Zealand needs
to generate a minimum of $120,000 per
employment, given its current FTE number of
1,300,000 (1 FTE = 1 Full Time Employment).
Industry sectors such as tourism and winery,
although popular, manage to generate
$100,000 and $80,000 per job respectively.
This is again caused by their nature to employ
labourers for largely unskilled and low-impact
jobs. It is clear that we need to look beyond the
current orientation and invest in a sector that
has potential to prosper in the long term.
The key to generate value beyond the current
minimum would be to invest in sectors
which create high value commodities. The
science, technology, as well as the high value
manufacturing and services industry are
sectors that present us with this opportunity.
For example, in the scale of New Zealand,
Fisher & Paykell is currently the leader in
innovation as well as R&D. The company
currently employs 1,250 people and generates
$290 million in revenue per year. This accounts
for $232,000 generated per FTE, making it one
of NZs top earning companies.
In the scale of Christchurch, emerging
companies in the Information and
Communications Technology (ICT) sector
present an opportunity to progress in this
direction. ICT currently employs 4500 people
in Christchurch and generates over $ 850
million Gross Regional Product (GRP) per
year. This accounts for an average of $190,000
generated per FTE, 60% more value than
the minimum required for New Zealand to
maintain its current economic position.
Christchurchs existing secondary industry is a
large component within the citys employment
landscape. This has greatly infuenced the
development of its urban fabric. The industrial
line located in the southern part of the city
forms a transport network that connects the
industrial zones of Christchurch city to the port
in Lyttelton, where commodities are shipped to
overseas destinations. However, between the
period of 2005 and 2009, the manufacturing
industry experienced a signifcant decline
of 8% in terms of its recorded business units,
which led to a loss of 5,000 employments and
a $200 million decline in the citys GRP. It is
these facts that highlight an opportunity, one
where Christchurch could transition from a
manufacturing based economy to a knowledge
based economy. The recent Canterbury
earthquakes have also prompted investments
to be made towards the citys future, and it
is within this timeframe that an opportunity
to invest in innovation emerges. This could
have the added value of changing the citys
employment landscape.
In order to establish a knowledge based
economy, a critical mass in the form of an
educated workforce is needed. Christchurch
holds potential in fostering this new aspect
of economic growth, given that it produces
a substantial number of graduates from its
universities (around 25% of NZs graduates)
and is recorded to have over 10,000 people
that are currently being employed in the feld
Thesis Statement
7 Alex Haryowiseno
of science and research. These are aspects
which will be benefcial in creating the initial
talent pool needed to establish it as a city for
science, technology & innovation. However,
the declining number of students coming from
the technology and sciences feld, a fact that
was highlighted in multiple OECD reports,
remains an aspect that needs to be addressed,
given their role in creating the critical mass
needed in order to start and sustain the shift
towards innovation economics. By fostering
this educated workforce, the city will be able
to create a self-reinforcing cycle (Komninos,
2008) which creates a synergy with its
existing manufacturing sector. The emerging
industries in science and technologies serve
as potentials for development and could
increase the amount of technological export
products from New Zealand, while the existing
manufacturing industries also stand to beneft
from improved efciency as a result.
This thesis proposes to look at architectures
role in encouraging the regeneration of
Christchurchs economy through supporting
innovation and technological development.
Within the premise of this post-industrial
scenario, strategies that aim to direct
Christchurch towards an economy based on
knowledge as a primary commodity will be
proposed. As an urban strategy, potential areas
for regeneration will be located, particularly
within the citys existing industrial zones. By
utilizing existing facilities and the associated
transportation system within these zones,
the proposed centres aim to create synergy
between the emerging high value sectors with
the existing manufacturing sectors and bridge
the gap between the northern and southern
suburbs of the city.
The importance of maintaining an innovation
ecosystem, in order to enable the organic
process of knowledge and information
exchange between diferent sectors
(businesses, institutions, etc.), has been widely
discussed (Komninos, 2008) It is within the
premise of this ecosystem that innovation
can occur. The integration of competences
from various social areas, such as education,
science, politics and the public, is an
integral part of encouraging growth through
innovative means (Simmie, 2001). As such, the
research and design process will take stance
from an ecological perspective. Within this
methodology, architecture assumes the role
of contributing to the continuous provision
and adaptation of the built environment as
a framing system of social communication
and organized spatial relations (Schumacer,
2010). As an ecological system, Architecture
becomes the connective strand that creates
the possibility for innovation and exchange of
knowledge to occur.
The built environment operates as a catalyst
for these developments to happen but they
are dependent on the progression of other
economies within the city. Aspects such as
quality of life, progress of education and
advancement in sustainable practice will be
necessary in order to maintain the standard of
living to allow these environments to operate.
The interdependency of these diferent aspects
will also be looked at as part of the designs
ecological framework.
8 Future Christchurch | Innovation Economy
1. Innovation Economics
The concept of innovation economics
positions a nations advance of technological
development and knowledge transfer at the
centre of its economic strategy (Lambooy
& Boschma, 1998.). One of the fundamental
aspects to this doctrine is that higher
productivity, efciency and more efective
use of resources should be achieved through
higher levels of innovation.
In many cases within the worlds emerging and
developed countries, this would mean a shift
away from the traditional material economy
based on export and manufacturing, and into
a new paradigm which fosters innovation
capacity and knowledge based economy.
Growth in innovation economics is the end-
product of knowledge transfer, policies allowing
for entrepreneurship and innovation (R&D
expenditures, permits, licenses), technological
spillovers and contact between collaborative
frms, as well as systems of innovation that
create innovative environments (clusters,
agglomerations, metropolitan areas).
Empirical evidence worldwide points to a
positive link between technological innovation
and economic performance. For example,
Germanys fourishing Bio-tech industries
can be attributed to a national innovation
system where there exists such factors as R&D
subsidies to joint projects, network partners,
and clustering efect which facilitates close
contacts with research associates.
A shift towards innovation leads to a better
perception the quality of life, as shown in
the GE Survey for global innovation (2012).
Innovation is seen to have signifcant potential
in facilitating future advances in the felds of
healthcare, energy, environmental quality, as
well as improving the job market.
The following sections will look at the
necessary aspects required in order to
implement this economic theories, as well
as the perceived barriers currently faced by
New Zealand in order to establish itself as an
innovative country.
WORKFORCE
ATTRACTION
MARKET
INTERACTION
ORGANIZATIONS
&
POLICIES
INNOVATION
PROCESS
Adaptation of environment
Adaptation of environment
Conducive Innovation
Environment
Fig 1. Innovation Economics Diagram Fig 2. Diagram on the Perceived Efects of Innovation of Innovation
9 Alex Haryowiseno
1.2. Connective Structure
1.3. Commercialization as
a form of Knowledge transfer
1.1. Innovation through the
Built Environment
Innovation is serendipitous in its nature. As
such, it is important to consider that we can
not plan innovation as a linear process. Rather,
we can create environments within which
innovation can fourish as the result of the
organic process between its associated actors
(research institutions, small to medium sized
companies, government research facilities,
etc.). (Komninos, 2008)
The Agglomeration theory (close proximity
of businesses lead to a higher level of
competition and therefore a higher level
of productivity) is seen as a signifcant
contributor to innovation, and regions which
possess such urban confgurations, signifed
by the presence of high quality facilities
and attractive environments are in a better
position to attract and retain innovators and
brainworkers. (Lambooy & Boschma, 1998)
Local mechanisms such as meetings at
tradeshows, conferences, seminars and social
activities are also seen as contributors to the
exchange of knowledge in the region.
The discussion in regards to innovation
always emphasizes the importance of
cooperation - It attributes innovation to the
ability of organizations to collaborate and
advance collective learning and knowledge
sharing. There is a great need to promote
an awareness to innovation culture within
businesses, organizations & the general public.
Entrepreneurship, cooperation between
institutions, research facilities, as well as
companies all contribute to this to create
networks of synergy (Simmie, 2001.) In order to
Research is a crucial component of innovation;
but it becomes fertile by mobilizing various
capabilities within a wider system of
knowledge, risk taking & entrepreneurialism.
Converting scientifc knowledge into new
products and services, which is the core
process of innovation, is only feasible
under an environment rich in resources for
research, experimentation, fnancing and
entrepreneurialism.
In order to facilitate the organic nature of
the interactions, a conducive innovation
environment needs to be provided, one that
allows the 5 basic innovation functions to
operate: research, funding, technology transfer,
new product development, and innovation
supply networking (Komninos, 2008)
facilitate this connectivity, measure of business
clustering which is enabled by a consideration
of the urban fabric will be needed. This
facilitates increased ccolaboration between
organizations which can lead to higher levels
of productivity
Eforts to introducing Innovation to New
Zealands economy is currently met with
several barriers which can be classifed
into problems within 3 difering scales
of interaction: Culture, Connectivity and
Capability. In order to implement an economic
strategy based on innovation, it is necessary to
locate key areas of issues within these aspects,
as well as the possible solutions which can be
facilitated by a consideration of the urban and
architectural form.
1.4. Perceived Barriers to
Developing Innovation culture
1. The frst problem looks at New Zealands
National and Organizational Cultural
Barriers, which involves the current
interaction between New Zealand and the
global market. In order to establish innovation
as a key factor in the progress of the countrys
economy, several problems within this aspect
can be identifed:
New Zealands OECD ranking
A reliance on primary industries and the
exploit of natural resources
Relatively low support for the long-term
investment in R&D
2. The second problem looks at the issue
of Connectivity, which deals with the way
organizations operate and policies are
implemented to support the progress of
innovation. The following problems currently
needs to dealt with:
Lack of business and research clustering. Sub-
par networking and collaboration between
industries, universities and research facilities
A lack of advanced technology manufacturing
infrastructure
There is a need to turn more research projects
into commercial products
3. The third problem looks at Capability
issues, revolving around the workforce needed
to support the progress of innovation. Current
problems exist which revolve around:
Low mobility of R&D staf between
universities, CRIs and industry
Problems with the attraction and retention of
an educated workforce.
10 Future Christchurch | Innovation Economy
2.1.1 New Zealands decline in OECD ranking
The Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD) report has high-
lighted New Zealands decline in economic
growth when compared to the OECD average.
Although NZ started out well above the OECD
average in the 1970s, its position continued to
fall down. It currently sits at 22nd out of 33
countries.
The entry of Britain into the European
Union and the resulting loss of free entry to
British markets for dairy products, and the oil
price shocks of the 1970s are also potential
explanations for New Zealands relative fall in
the real GDP per capita rankings during this
period.
Although New Zealand performs well in
2. Creating a Culture Based
on Innovation
The frst aspect necessary to introduce
innovation into to a countrys economic
development plan is situated within the global
realm - that is to determine the countrys
current position given its economic strategy,
and whether a shift towards an approach based
on innovation is needed
This step starts by looking at how New
Zealand is doing economically compared
to other countries in the Organization of
Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) (Section 2.1), an analysis of NZs
current market orientation will then be done
to determine whether it deters or supports
New Zealands progress (Section 2.2). A local
study based on Christchurchs existing and
emerging industries will then be carried out
to locate opportunities within the scale of the
city. (Section 2.3) A conclusion will then be
drawn out (Section 2.4)
2.1. New Zealand Within the Global Context
Fig 3. OECD ranking (1972 to 2009)
certain areas within the OECDs measure,
some aspects are lacking which ultimately
lead to the inability for the country to reverse
the decline in prosperity.
For example: New Zealand ranks as the 3rd
most democratic country and the 6th in terms
of its achievement in the feld of science,
however it currently sits on the 26th position
in terms of the rate of employment output.
The cause of this as well as its impact on the
nations economy will be discussed in the
following sections.
11 Alex Haryowiseno
2.2.1. A Measure of NZs Productivity
The decline in New Zealands relative
prosperity compared to other OECD
countries since the 1970s can be attributed
to its current economic orientation favoring
industries with intensive labour and low-
impact output.
This fact is shown in the diagram to the
right, which measures a countrys properity
in terms of the average number of working
hours and the amount of output generated per
person. It is clearly shown that New Zealand
is the second hardest working country out of
the list (putting around 15% more working
time compared to the OECD average), yet
generates one of the lowest output (We
achieve an output worth only 80% of what the
rest of the OECD countries achieve)
2.2.2. New Zealands Market
Orientation
New Zealand currently generates an average
of $29,800 GDP per capita. In order to just
maintain this rate (and thus its 22nd position
out of 33 countries), we need to generate
$120,000 from every one of our 1,300,000 Full
Time Employments (FTE). However, NZs
current economic orientation towards primary
exports in agriculture, forestry low-skilled and
low-impact employment makes this hard to do.
Popular industries such as wine and tourism
only generate around $100,000 and $80,000
per FTE. In order to prosper in the long term,
we need to consider other sectors which has
the ability to create high-impact employments.
2.2. NZs Market Orientation
Fig 4. Measure of productivity within OECD countries
Fig 5. Amount of revenue generated per FTE